View Full Version : 9//11 Truths?
JJ Insane1
10-31-2005, 02:15 AM
I have a question for ANYONE who actually BELIEVES the bullshit excuse that Osama highjackers caused those building to topple......
Answer me this - How can you take the (bush appointed) 9/11 commission serious when 7 of the highjackers they claim flew the planes are STILL alive?
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html
If the people they "accuse" are still alive then WHO flew the planes? If you say "Osamas boys" ... where is the 9/11 commissions proof?
Is "just because they say so" proof?
How can intelligent fucking human beings actually believe these buildings fell SO PERFECTLY into SMALL rubble ... STRAIGHT DOWN .... by Jets hitting them?
Come on people... use some common since.
JJ Insane1
JJ Insane1
10-31-2005, 02:49 AM
9/11 Attacks… World witnessed tragedy.
9//11 – Government has excuse to wage war with Afghanistan because it “claims” (not proves) that Osama and the Al Quada are the terrorist who did this horrible act.
(Where claiming Osama within 48 hours of the attacks – coincidence?)
War on Afghanistan is waged and we spent about 30 days blowing up rocks and never actually finding the ACCUSED – Osama Bin Laden.
Now… USA has its “pipeline” (Afghanistan) for Iraqs Oil… but a problem ?
How do we wage war to take over Iraq ? George claims that Saddam has ties to Al Quada … well… nope he didn’t but …. He has WMD (proven faults documentation with the downing street memo) ….. so WAR on Iraq – guess what? After blowing the entire country to hell and killing THOUSANDS of innocent women and children – leveling everything they basically have in life ….. Well.. what do ya know? No WMD… No ties to Al Quada …. Nothing…. Nada … nilch.
So… what is Georges next excuse for blowing them all to hell and taking there oil now that BOTH bullshit excuses to wage there illegal war are PROVEN lies….
Here we go (get this shit) … “OPERATION IRAQIE FREEDOM” is set in place … Yeah, that’s it.. the USA is now a “MARTER” and HERO to the “free” (dead) people in Iraq.
Well…. Somehow this didn’t blow over to well with Americans and we wanted a REAL excuse for being stuck in a shit hole country for 3 years while LOOSING a ENDLESS battle against a target you CAN NOT stop……
So. Ol Bush comes up with the…. “we have to fight them over there, so we don’t face them here” BULLSHIT excuse.
OH… MY GOD! What a fucking crock of shit people.
For real? You actually buy this load of SHIT?
Fight them over there… so we don’t fight them over here?
Do you know how EASY it is to fly straight out of Europe or anywhere else in the world into Mexico….
Do you know how EASY it is to walk straight out of MEXICO and right into the USA?
Its done DAILY by hundreds if not thousands of illegal immigrants …. Are you telling me a terrorist cant accomplish something a homeless, broke desperate immigrant can do?
Why didn’t he claim Syria had ties to Al Quada? Why not North Korea? We all know they are WAY more terrorist inclined, and actually DO have WMD….
Here is why… 2 reasons, they can actually FIGHT BACK (bullies do not like people who stand up to them) and… THEY HAVE NO OIL. … OIL … OIL.. !!!!
MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY!
There ARE NO FUCKING TERRORIST. If there were terrorist… they would be reeking havoc on our country at this point because…well, quiet simply put… the entire ARAB world hates our bully ass now.
Think about it people…. Open your eyes.
Where the fuck is Osama? HE IS FUCKING FREE! Why did we spend 1 trillion dollars fucking up IRAQ… capturing Saddam… and all the while the fucking person they accuse of starting all this shit is running around FREE! A 6FT 3 INCH mother fucker on a kidney dialysis machine is still walking freely around a fucking rock filled desert without being so much as photographed…. But Ol Saddam is taking it in the ass.
WAR FOR OIL.
PERIOD.
OUR SOLDIERS DIED FOR OIL … they are pawns in a game of big time money machines….
This has NOTHING to do with WMD. This has NOTHING to do with “ties to Al Quada”
This has NOTHING to do with “freedom” in Iraq. It has NOTHING to do with Osama … it has NOTHING to do with “terrorism”.
How can anyone with a common since not see this? I know most of not ALL of you guys are intelligent people… I understand its not what you WANT to hear. No one wants to think there country is being run by a ruthless tyrant … but if the shoe fits … well ya know.
JJ Insane1
Big A
10-31-2005, 08:07 AM
9/11 Attacks… World witnessed tragedy.
9//11 – Government has excuse to wage war with Afghanistan because it “claims” (not proves) that Osama and the Al Quada are the terrorist who did this horrible act.
(Where claiming Osama within 48 hours of the attacks – coincidence?)
War on Afghanistan is waged and we spent about 30 days blowing up rocks and never actually finding the ACCUSED – Osama Bin Laden.
Now… USA has its “pipeline” (Afghanistan) for Iraqs Oil… but a problem ?
How do we wage war to take over Iraq ? George claims that Saddam has ties to Al Quada … well… nope he didn’t but …. He has WMD (proven faults documentation with the downing street memo) ….. so WAR on Iraq – guess what? After blowing the entire country to hell and killing THOUSANDS of innocent women and children – leveling everything they basically have in life ….. Well.. what do ya know? No WMD… No ties to Al Quada …. Nothing…. Nada … nilch.
So… what is Georges next excuse for blowing them all to hell and taking there oil now that BOTH bullshit excuses to wage there illegal war are PROVEN lies….
Here we go (get this shit) … “OPERATION IRAQIE FREEDOM” is set in place … Yeah, that’s it.. the USA is now a “MARTER” and HERO to the “free” (dead) people in Iraq.
Well…. Somehow this didn’t blow over to well with Americans and we wanted a REAL excuse for being stuck in a shit hole country for 3 years while LOOSING a ENDLESS battle against a target you CAN NOT stop……
So. Ol Bush comes up with the…. “we have to fight them over there, so we don’t face them here” BULLSHIT excuse.
OH… MY GOD! What a fucking crock of shit people.
For real? You actually buy this load of SHIT?
Fight them over there… so we don’t fight them over here?
Do you know how EASY it is to fly straight out of Europe or anywhere else in the world into Mexico….
Do you know how EASY it is to walk straight out of MEXICO and right into the USA?
Its done DAILY by hundreds if not thousands of illegal immigrants …. Are you telling me a terrorist cant accomplish something a homeless, broke desperate immigrant can do?
Why didn’t he claim Syria had ties to Al Quada? Why not North Korea? We all know they are WAY more terrorist inclined, and actually DO have WMD….
Here is why… 2 reasons, they can actually FIGHT BACK (bullies do not like people who stand up to them) and… THEY HAVE NO OIL. … OIL … OIL.. !!!!
MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY!
There ARE NO FUCKING TERRORIST. If there were terrorist… they would be reeking havoc on our country at this point because…well, quiet simply put… the entire ARAB world hates our bully ass now.
Think about it people…. Open your eyes.
Where the fuck is Osama? HE IS FUCKING FREE! Why did we spend 1 trillion dollars fucking up IRAQ… capturing Saddam… and all the while the fucking person they accuse of starting all this shit is running around FREE! A 6FT 3 INCH mother fucker on a kidney dialysis machine is still walking freely around a fucking rock filled desert without being so much as photographed…. But Ol Saddam is taking it in the ass.
WAR FOR OIL.
PERIOD.
OUR SOLDIERS DIED FOR OIL … they are pawns in a game of big time money machines….
This has NOTHING to do with WMD. This has NOTHING to do with “ties to Al Quada”
This has NOTHING to do with “freedom” in Iraq. It has NOTHING to do with Osama … it has NOTHING to do with “terrorism”.
How can anyone with a common since not see this? I know most of not ALL of you guys are intelligent people… I understand its not what you WANT to hear. No one wants to think there country is being run by a ruthless tyrant … but if the shoe fits … well ya know.
JJ Insane1
Every person in every other country sees this whole matter just as you described it, so it is baffling why there are so many americans that do not see the logic. Unless something else is being shown in the US media that is not shown in any other country in the world.
JJ Insane1
10-31-2005, 02:12 PM
Unless something else is being shown in the US media that is not shown in any other country in the world.
You hit the nail on the head my friend.
M-E-D-I-A!
All the US gets to see is government propaganda hyped up Bush inspired bullshit. Every single AMERICAN based media source is SCARED to spill the beans about how fucked up this war is... why? They need there job!
Let one single AMERICAN BASED news publication - and AMERICAN paid reporter/journalist report something against what the Bush admin wants to be published and .... bye bye my friend. FIRED.
Look at Dan Rather... he just mentioned the fact that Bush dodged the fucking war like the pussy he is... and BOOM... he is gone.
Yeah "technically" he resigned... but anyone with any common since knows.. he was FORCED to.
He even gave an interview over in Europe stating he was basically forced out. He said the USA was seen as a "burning rubber tire" to the rest of the world... meaning it just kept burning.... and the smoke just kept getting blacker.
So... no the USA does not see what the rest of the world see, your right.
I DO... I have an open mind enough to read FOREIGN publications... and WORLD media. Not just what i am TOLD to read.
JJ Insane1
JJ Insane1
10-31-2005, 02:58 PM
READ...
http://whatreallyhappened.com/shake.html
Watch this -
Scroll down to the article in blue entitled -
""...the FBI most likely thinks that there was a car or truck packed with explosives underneath the buildings which also exploded at the same time and brought both of them down."
USA Today 9/11/2001 video."
Click and watch.
Now.. open your mind and THINK about it.
JJ Insane1
rrtrpsgt
11-05-2005, 04:40 PM
www.letsroll911.org
www.infowars.com
www.thepowerhour.com
www.rense.com
www.skolnicksreport.com
BigBoyJ
11-05-2005, 07:33 PM
Oh lord, not this again, JJ. It doesn't matter what anyone says. You've seen people give educated responses on what really happened (and I'm not talking about the conspiracy site). You refuse to see logic, man. That stuff in those links is ridiculous bullshit.
JJ Insane1
11-05-2005, 07:37 PM
Oh lord, not this again, JJ. It doesn't matter what anyone says. You've seen people give educated responses on what really happened (and I'm not talking about the conspiracy site). You refuse to see logic, man. That stuff in those links is ridiculous bullshit.
Just because a "government hired" investigator "says so" is not a LOCICAL explanation. For EVERY logical explanation you give me i can counter it with... fact and common since.
I wouldn’t expect YOU to believe anything i post.. but judging from all the PMs i get from bros who are to scared to stick there neck out there... i am not alone in my beliefs.
I can sit here and type 100+ questions that your "government controlled" "excuses" CAN NOT PROVE.
ANYONE with just a "smidget" of COMMON since can watch those building fall and COMMON since will tell you... the where imploded! Period! There is NO way they could have fell that perfectly.... and no please don’t give me the "they where designed to fall that way" excuse because i can post you the links from the building CONTRACTORS and ARCHITECS that say they where DESIGNED to NEVER FALL... so designing them to fall straight down was not an option.
In the history of the WORLD... there has NEVER - EVER - been another STEEL structure EVER fallen from fire or heat. I can PROVE THIS ALSO.
So.. if you want to go fact for fact on this... i can bring it.
JJ Insane1
STORM SHADOW
11-05-2005, 08:53 PM
Actually you only counter w/conspiracy theories.
SS
We can all pull shit out of our ass and call it a fact. hehehe gawwwd I kill me.
Actually I think they fell 'cause the jet fuel burned the steel structures from within white hot.
JJ Insane1
11-05-2005, 08:58 PM
Here is something for you to PROVE otherwise. I have compiled a bunch of FACTS for you... go through EACH page and read slowly. Then... just "TRY" and debunk science and facts.
Some Proofs of Demolition
The towers' concrete was pulverized in the air.
The steel superstructures of the towers provided no more resistance to the falling rubble than air.
The expansion rate of the dust clouds produced by the collapses indicates heat energy far in excess of gravitational energy.
The South Tower's top shattered before falling into intact structure.
Proofs 1 and 2 require only common sense. Proof 3 uses basic thermodynamics, and Proof 4 uses basic mechanics."
Story Defies Most Basic Common Sense
The idea that the towers "fell down" shattering into small pieces and dust contradicts people's basic experience with physical structures.
A steel wood stove doesn't shatter because of prolonged exposure to fires.
A gas stove, with a flame hotter than any building fire, does not collapse on itself.
It is difficult to build even a house of cards that will collapse from top to bottom.
Yet engineers were tripping over themselves to explain the collapses,
not because they were made to by the perpetrators, but because they want to believe Osama bin Laden was responsible.
Now go to this site and READ.... I said READ... dont "SKIM" over it and dismiss it as... Bla bla bla... If you can prove other wise.. .then i could give your bullshit government excuse some weight... but you cant.
Here you go... start here and click NEXT on after reading EACH screen....
I am curious to hear your explinations of these SCIENTIFICLY PROVEN reasons the buildings fell... ie, IMPLOSION!
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/index.html
read.... AND... read SLOW!
JJ Insane1
BigBoyJ
11-05-2005, 09:40 PM
I showed you this before, JJ. It's an ACTUAL, LITERAL scientific study done to show why the towers collapsed. It's much more scientific, credible and just plain believable than that silly conspiracy bullshit, but I know you'll never open your eyes enough to see it. You WANT to believe the government is out to get you.
http://www.civil.usyd.edu.au/wtc.shtml
And look, it's not even a study that was done in America. But maybe our government controls Sydney University too.
STORM SHADOW
11-05-2005, 10:21 PM
sheeesh sometimes JJ acts like a far right winger conspiracy theorist. Breath of fresh air that it's mostly the leftists.
SS
Ok I admit it. It was the HAARP project in Alaska. They directed a super energy bolt of ELF at the Stratosphere and bounced directly at the towers. It's all clear now! yeahhhh yeahh thhhhhhhat's the ticket!
JJ Insane1
11-05-2005, 10:46 PM
You can say "conspracy" bla bla all you want.
The facts are:
The "offical" government explanation for those buildings collapsing was due to the fact the FIRE melted the steel.
Fact: The heat temperature of the fire would HAVE to be greater then ~1510º C ... AND... they have to be substained for hours.
Fact: The WTC fires NEVER exceeded 800º (this is posted in the offical 9/11 commison report) and as we all WITNESSED they where only burning for almost an hour... not HOURS.
FACTS:  1535ºC (2795ºF) - melting point of iron
~1510ºC (2750ºF) - melting point of typical structural steel
  ~825ºC (1517ºF) - maximum temperature of hydrocarbon fires burning in the atmosphere without pressurization or pre-heating (premixed fuel and air - blue flame)
Diffuse flames burn far cooler.
Oxygen-starved diffuse flames are cooler yet.
The fires in the towers were diffuse -- well below 800ºC.
Their dark smoke showed they were oxygen-starved -- particularly in the South Tower.
FACT:(On audio tape) Mayor Giuliani's QUOTE "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.'
FACT : The term "PULL" means to intentionally demoloish a building.
FACTS:
Fires continued to burn deep in the rubble pile for 100 days, despite the spraying of water onto the pile.
When the rubble was cleared, pools of previously melted steel were discovered at the foundations.
Temperatures needed to melt steel (~1510ºC) could not have been caused by residual hydrocarbon fires. Usually one needs a blast furnace to melt steel.
FACT: Fires have never collapsed skyscrapers.
The 100+ year history of steel frame high-rise buildings provides a number of documented examples of skyscrapers subjected to severe fires.
Examples include:
-1991 One Meridian Plaza fire in Philadelphia
Raged for 18 hours
Gutted 8 floors of the 38 floor building
IT NEVER FELL!
-1988 First Interstate Bank Building fire in Los Angeles
Burned out of control for 3-1/2 hours
Gutted 4 floors of the 64-floor tower
Burned low in building
IT NEVER FELL!
NO MATTER WHAT SITE THEY COME FROM.... THESE ARE ALL FACTS!
These FACTS prove those buildings couldnt have fallen from the heat produced by those burning fucking planes. PERIOD.
Now ... please dont come back with some bullshit like this "sheeesh sometimes JJ acts like a far right winger conspiracy theorist. Breath of fresh air that it's mostly the leftists" ... or "You WANT to believe the government is out to get you."
This just shows me that you CANT give me a logical explanation to the FACTS i lay in front of you and you choose to attack me instead of the FACTs i present.
Come on ... prove to me any of the things i typed above are not FACT?
JJ Insane1
BigBoyJ
11-06-2005, 01:10 AM
Did you even read the article I posted? At least read this paragragh.
"Once one storey collapsed all floors above would have begun to fall. The huge mass of falling structure would gain momentum, crushing the structurally intact floors below, resulting in catastrophic failure of the entire structure. While the columns at say level 50 were designed to carry the static load of 50 floors above, once one floor collapsed and the floors above started to fall, the dynamic load of 50 storeys above is very much greater, and the columns were almost instantly destroyed as each floor progressively "pancaked" to the ground."
Ok, JJ. The weight of the floors ABOVE the point of impact collapsed due to the damage AT the point of impact. Once those floors started falling, the pressure was much greater than the structure was designed to withstand. So, the floors caved in on one another until the whole building pancaked to the ground. The structural integrity of the building was compromised at impact. That combined with the heat caused the buildings to collapse. WHY is that so incomprehensable?
ONE MORE TIME, JJ. Just because you like the way something sounds, that does NOT make it fact.
You're makin' me crazy.:eek: :mad: :confused: :o :D
STORM SHADOW
11-06-2005, 01:50 AM
BigBoy...what did I tell you about using logic on leftists? *wink*
SS
BigBoyJ
11-06-2005, 05:57 AM
BigBoy...what did I tell you about using logic on leftists? *wink*
SS
I know, I know. It's like talking to my shoe.
STORM SHADOW
11-06-2005, 10:49 AM
BigBoy...I've come to the conclusion that JJ can't live in a world without XFiles. There has to be an XFile behind every door or he won't be happy. When Iraq is finally considered a success (and it will), he'll have an XFile to explain it. There's a good chance that the Republicans will lose the Presidential race because of media. I'm sure he'll relate success in Iraq to the democrats... even though.. no matter who wins the office this person will have to follow the exact same policies on Iraq as President Bush did. Oh it will be tweeked a little bit and the liberal media will make shit look like chocolate... but it will be President Bush's policies continued in reality.
I'm sure that even if the dems (if they win office), attack Syria, he'll find an XFile to explain why we need to. As long as it's not President Bush doing it. It's funny, I listened to all these calls on the floors of Congress by Dems that Saddam must be stopped, that he had WMDs, that he was too dangerous to National Security to remain in power etc. etc. etc. What was funny, these calls on the floor of congress were during CLINTON's admin hehehehehehe
The reality of it all is... if the dems and liberal media (whom know President Bush was right), give him the credit due... it's the complete end of the dem party for decades to come. So what do they do? the most horrable thing an American can do during a major conflict when Americans are in harms way... attack the President lowering the moral of warriors and people at home when our energies should be mobilized.
I used to get along great with the left until they did this. Now... the left can burn in hell. Had it been a dem in power and we were in such a conflict and the reps did this.. I in all honesty...would have left my party...not for the left..but for a different party on the right never to return to the republicans.
This bullshit about "I support the troops but don't support the President" OMG it's such bullshit. You attack the CINC, you attack the Nation and the warriors in harms way.
Also... I believe if you're against the attack on Iraq, you're for putting Saddam right back in power. I believe that with all my heart. I believe 100% that if you're against President Bush........ you're on Saddam's side. People against President Bush probably call terrorists and insurgents in Iraq 'Freedom Fighters' in private.
These are the people that would let Muslims march across our land unchallenged, move in, riot and burn cities to the ground and say "we don't need to fight them, we need a dialogue with them" remember what's going on in France? Supposed culture capital of the world. Welcomed Muslims in with open arms. France talked smack against the USA for our conflict in the mideast taking Iraq's side. What did the Muslims do? Start torching France, their best allie in the Western World. France, a socialist country that carries people from cradle to grave... regardless of the conditions in the muslims neighborhoods...it's better than where they came from...they did move there...duhhhh. How are the benefits returned? with the fire of a match and violence.
They are a plague and nothing will change my mind.
SS
JJ Insane1
11-06-2005, 04:17 PM
Did you even read the article I posted? At least read this paragragh.
"Once one storey collapsed all floors above would have begun to fall. The huge mass of falling structure would gain momentum, crushing the structurally intact floors below, resulting in catastrophic failure of the entire structure. While the columns at say level 50 were designed to carry the static load of 50 floors above, once one floor collapsed and the floors above started to fall, the dynamic load of 50 storeys above is very much greater, and the columns were almost instantly destroyed as each floor progressively "pancaked" to the ground."
Ok, JJ. The weight of the floors ABOVE the point of impact collapsed due to the damage AT the point of impact. Once those floors started falling, the pressure was much greater than the structure was designed to withstand. So, the floors caved in on one another until the whole building pancaked to the ground. The structural integrity of the building was compromised at impact. That combined with the heat caused the buildings to collapse. WHY is that so incomprehensable?
ONE MORE TIME, JJ. Just because you like the way something sounds, that does NOT make it fact.
You're makin' me crazy.:eek: :mad: :confused: :o :D
Bro - Sorry but that bullshit "pancake theory" just isnt possible on the WTC... the floors where built around the CORE and if the floors WOULD have pan caked then the CORE would have stood still... yet the CORE was disintegrated into DUST! Dust bro... how can just "falling" turn pure steel and concrete into pure dust?
The Column Failure Theory (Pancake theory) is Inapplicable
FACT:The fires were not hot enough to cause column failures.
Theory (Bazant & Zhou) assumes all columns on a floor were raised to 800º C.
FACT: Fires did not cover an entire floor in either tower.
FACT: None of the features of 700+ºC fires were observed:
FACT: NO steel glowing red-hot
FACT: NO extensive window breakage
FACT: No big bright emergent flames
FACT: NO light smoke (not seen after first few minutes)
FACT: No fires have ever caused column failure in steel structures in the history of humanity.
FACT: Steel structures stay far below flame temperatures, because of steel's thermal conductivity.
FACT: Corus Construction performed extensive tests subjecting uninsulated steel-frame carparks to prolonged hydrocarbon-fueled fires.
The highest recorded steel temperatures were 360ºC.
So... simply put. the pancake bullshit is just that... bullshit.
I can give you links to WITNESSES (You where NOT a witness) that testify that EVERYTHING in the rubble was PURE dust. No computers, no desks, nothing but steel and dust.
Simply pan caking cant accomplish this.
JJ Insane1
BigBoyJ
11-06-2005, 04:20 PM
You are 100% right, Storm Shadow. When it comes to Muslims extremists, it doesn't matter how friendly you are. You can let them come into your country, take care of them, be their best friend. But, what it all comes down to is this. Do you worship Allah? No? Then you must die. Stupid ass French.
When it comes to our ol' buddy JJ, I'm just lost. Once things for sure though, JJ, you need to get the one guy that truly idolizes you over here. You know who it is.....LeapFrog.
Storm, you should see when LeapFrog and JJ get together. Holy crap, you'd think you were being hunted by the cia while chasing oompa loompas on a unicorn after stealing a leprechauns pot of gold in Oz.
JJ Insane1
11-06-2005, 04:29 PM
BigBoy...I've come to the conclusion that JJ can't live in a world without XFiles. There has to be an XFile behind every door or he won't be happy. When Iraq is finally considered a success (and it will), he'll have an XFile to explain it. There's a good chance that the Republicans will lose the Presidential race because of media. I'm sure he'll relate success in Iraq to the democrats... even though.. no matter who wins the office this person will have to follow the exact same policies on Iraq as President Bush did. Oh it will be tweeked a little bit and the liberal media will make shit look like chocolate... but it will be President Bush's policies continued in reality.
I'm sure that even if the dems (if they win office), attack Syria, he'll find an XFile to explain why we need to. As long as it's not President Bush doing it. It's funny, I listened to all these calls on the floors of Congress by Dems that Saddam must be stopped, that he had WMDs, that he was too dangerous to National Security to remain in power etc. etc. etc. What was funny, these calls on the floor of congress were during CLINTON's admin hehehehehehe
The reality of it all is... if the dems and liberal media (whom know President Bush was right), give him the credit due... it's the complete end of the dem party for decades to come. So what do they do? the most horrable thing an American can do during a major conflict when Americans are in harms way... attack the President lowering the moral of warriors and people at home when our energies should be mobilized.
I used to get along great with the left until they did this. Now... the left can burn in hell. Had it been a dem in power and we were in such a conflict and the reps did this.. I in all honesty...would have left my party...not for the left..but for a different party on the right never to return to the republicans.
This bullshit about "I support the troops but don't support the President" OMG it's such bullshit. You attack the CINC, you attack the Nation and the warriors in harms way.
Also... I believe if you're against the attack on Iraq, you're for putting Saddam right back in power. I believe that with all my heart. I believe 100% that if you're against President Bush........ you're on Saddam's side. People against President Bush probably call terrorists and insurgents in Iraq 'Freedom Fighters' in private.
These are the people that would let Muslims march across our land unchallenged, move in, riot and burn cities to the ground and say "we don't need to fight them, we need a dialogue with them" remember what's going on in France? Supposed culture capital of the world. Welcomed Muslims in with open arms. France talked smack against the USA for our conflict in the mideast taking Iraq's side. What did the Muslims do? Start torching France, their best allie in the Western World. France, a socialist country that carries people from cradle to grave... regardless of the conditions in the muslims neighborhoods...it's better than where they came from...they did move there...duhhhh. How are the benefits returned? with the fire of a match and violence.
They are a plague and nothing will change my mind.
SS
SS - you seem to want to turn everything i say into a Lefty this.. righty that... or Democrat this ... Republican that....Muslim this… Ahhhhh Jeezzz
I could CARE LESS about any of that. I could care less if Bush was a lefty, righty, democrat, bla bla bla... all i know for 100% is, he is a IDIOT - he is LOOSING all his support in the US and around the world - He is headed DOWN hill fast.. He lied to start a war for his own personal gain..... and i 100% hate that mother fucker with all my heart.
So... please dont make this complicated. I am not "political" this or that.. i am ANTI BUSH. Period.
I like how you always seem to call me this... or say i am a x-files junky... but you cant seem to offer any explanations to the FACTS i present.
I guess Special Forces just teaches you to DO WHAT YOUR TOLD and not think for your self.
JJ Insane1
BigBoyJ
11-06-2005, 04:30 PM
JJ, you post random facts that in isolated cases are inapplicable to the WTC attacks. Sometimes an individual fact isn't a fact when it's combined with a larger set of circumstances. In other words, you're looking at individual scientific facts instead of seeing the all of the circumstances involved at the WTC that change those facts as they would've been individually.
When you combine a massive impact, a huge explosion, enormously high heat and compounded weight, even buildings as strong as the WTC can and DID fall. No demolition needed.
And JJ, if EVERYTHING was dust, why were there still SO MANY survivors of the attacks? Why were bodies and body parts left? There were papers, office supplies, all sorts of shit. You need to learn to see things other than what you like to see.
JJ Insane1
11-06-2005, 04:32 PM
You are 100% right, Storm Shadow. When it comes to Muslims extremists, it doesn't matter how friendly you are. You can let them come into your country, take care of them, be their best friend. But, what it all comes down to is this. Do you worship Allah? No? Then you must die. Stupid ass French.
When it comes to our ol' buddy JJ, I'm just lost. Once things for sure though, JJ, you need to get the one guy that truly idolizes you over here. You know who it is.....LeapFrog.
Storm, you should see when LeapFrog and JJ get together. Holy crap, you'd think you were being hunted by the cia while chasing oompa loompas on a unicorn after stealing a leprechauns pot of gold in Oz.
Thats it BBJ - bounce around actually answering my post by making fun of what i believe in. Yeah... Only in America.
BTW- JJ and LEAPFROG are ... Hmmm whats that called? THE MAJORITY in this country! You are what now? Oh... thats it! THE MINORITY! That my friend is.... a ... fact.
I figured you would dodge the facts.
JJ Insane1
BigBoyJ
11-06-2005, 04:35 PM
Apparently you didn't see the post above the one you just wrote. As for being a minority, I live in San Antonio, just being white makes me a minority.:D
JJ Insane1
11-06-2005, 04:40 PM
JJ, you post random facts that in isolated cases are inapplicable to the WTC attacks. Sometimes an individual fact isn't a fact when it's combined with a larger set of circumstances. In other words, you're looking at individual scientific facts instead of seeing the all of the circumstances involved at the WTC that change those facts as they would've been individually.
When you combine a massive impact, a huge explosion, enormously high heat and compounded weight, even buildings as strong as the WTC can and DID fall. No demolition needed.
And JJ, if EVERYTHING was dust, why were there still SO MANY survivors of the attacks? Why were bodies and body parts left? There were papers, office supplies, all sorts of shit. You need to learn to see things other than what you like to see.
1000 bodies where vaporized beyond the point of being able to test there DNA... FACT.
Papers where blow from the building... BEING BLOWN away from a building means... EXPLOSION. Not pancaking.
NOTHING in the rubble contained ANYTHING from the building... except DUST.
Go read it your self. Show me a picture of ANY rubble containing ANYTHING but dust.
Show me office supplies.... show me?
"FACT:Non-Metallic Building Parts and Contents Were Thoroughly Pulverized
FACT:The concrete, glass, drywall, insulation, and other non-metallic building parts were pulverized to mostly sub-100 micron powder.
FACT:Nearly all office contents were pulverized beyond recognition.
FACT:1000 bodies were "vaporized", preventing identification, even with advanced DNA techniques. "
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/pulverization.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/dustcloud.html
Now... so you claim the planes caused the 2 towers to fall... pancaking due to heat? Thats your exclusion?
ANSWER ME THIS : WHY IN THE FUCK DID THE WTC #7 FALL STRAIGHT DOWN? NO PLANE HIT IT(so no bullshit pancaking effect due to heat)... NO HUGE FIRES WHERE EVER REPORTED OR WITNESSED? EXPLAIN THAT BRO
JJ Insane1
JJ Insane1
11-06-2005, 04:44 PM
live in San Antonio, just being white makes me a minority.:D
Thats great, but we are not talking about being white or black - we are talking about YOU being the MINORITY of the AMERICAN public that actually BELIEVES Georges BULLSHIT. Meaning: ALLOT more people see the president the way JJ and LEAPFROG do then.... BBJ or SS.
That... is just, a .... fact.
JJ Insane1
BigBoyJ
11-06-2005, 04:55 PM
Ok, JJ. Even IF there was nothing left but dust (which was NOT the case), then why did that happen. Demolition doesn't vaporize EVERYTHING either. Maybe is was the governments new subatomic vaporizing blaster. That's the only logical explanation....wait no, IT'S A FACT!!!!
JJ Insane1
11-06-2005, 08:51 PM
Ok, JJ. Even IF there was nothing left but dust (which was NOT the case), then why did that happen. Demolition doesn't vaporize EVERYTHING either. Maybe is was the governments new subatomic vaporizing blaster. That's the only logical explanation....wait no, IT'S A FACT!!!!
Well... YES it did turn everything to DUST. Pictures, witnesses and documented articles prove that fact.
As for a logical explination... i have no clue. I just know what it WASNT... and it WASNT caused by "heat" and "pancaking".
JJ Insane1
JJ Insane1
11-06-2005, 09:17 PM
Here ya go... see - I AM NOT ALONE -
http://www.newsday.com/news/printedition/newyork/nyc-nycons064501480nov06,0,3646064.story?coll=nyc-nynews-print
"The way some people connect the dots, 9/11 was the work of the U.S. military; the Twin Towers and 7 World Trade Center were wired with explosives and deliberately blown up; a satellite-guided missile, not a hijacked jet, plowed into the Pentagon; the jet that crashed in a Pennsylvania field actually was shot down by Sidewinder missiles"
JJ Insane1
BigBoyJ
11-06-2005, 10:35 PM
Well... YES it did turn everything to DUST. Pictures, witnesses and documented articles prove that fact.
As for a logical explination... i have no clue. I just know what it WASNT... and it WASNT caused by "heat" and "pancaking".
JJ Insane1
Well darn, I expected better from you. I was sure you'd have "facts" to back up what you say....or at least some fruity bastard's explanation. Hmmm, so now the government has a "vaporizing weapon" that we are using on our own people so that we have a reason to start wars with other countries?
And JJ slips farther and f a r t h e r and f a r t h e r away.
JJ Insane1
11-06-2005, 10:47 PM
Well darn, I expected better from you. I was sure you'd have "facts" to back up what you say....or at least some fruity bastard's explanation. Hmmm, so now the government has a "vaporizing weapon" that we are using on our own people so that we have a reason to start wars with other countries?
And JJ slips farther and f a r t h e r and f a r t h e r away.
Your the one slipping with the vaporizer bullshit... i didnt say anything about vaporizing anything.
I said the buildings where BLOWN apart by a controlled demolition.
Where do i say anything about a vaporizer?
Dude... you are the one thats "out there".
JJ Insane1
BigBoyJ
11-07-2005, 03:28 AM
Your the one slipping with the vaporizer bullshit... i didnt say anything about vaporizing anything.
I said the buildings where BLOWN apart by a controlled demolition.
Where do i say anything about a vaporizer?
Dude... you are the one thats "out there".
JJ Insane1
So now you didn't say everything was vaporized, JJAlzheimers1?
JJ Insane1
11-07-2005, 05:18 AM
So now you didn't say everything was vaporized, JJAlzheimers1?
GO BACK AND READ... I SAID EVERYTHING WAS VAPORIZED INTO DUST!
I never said anything about anyone using a fucking vaporizer. You came up with that lame ass bullshit.
There are explosives powerful enough to do the job... well, i guess you know that... because they did the job on 9/11
JJ Insane1
BigBoyJ
11-07-2005, 04:18 PM
Once again, why were there bodyparts? If it's powerful enough to vaporize a desk or metal chair, why not a human body? Read Big A's thread, why were there papers? Stop and think before you type.
JJ Insane1
11-07-2005, 04:29 PM
Once again, why were there bodyparts? If it's powerful enough to vaporize a desk or metal chair, why not a human body? Read Big A's thread, why were there papers? Stop and think before you type.
I am assuming NOT EVERYTHING GOT VAPORIZED -Duh
I told you... the papers where all over the streets... BLOW AWAY FROM THE BUILDING. I guess the same thing could be said for bodyparts. How do you know the body parts where not from people who JUMPED from the building?
When buildings collapse like they're full of explosives, and witnesses, seismic records, reviewed footage, physics, all seem to indicate that they collapsed that they're full of explosives, then I cannot help but conclude that they have collapsed because they were full of explosives.
never the less that must make me a nutty conspiracy theorist...
- what a funny free American!
JJ insane1
JJ Insane1
11-07-2005, 04:30 PM
Stop and think before you type.
Me stop and think? If you knew what "THINKING" on your own meant then you would not follow the bullshit you are TOLD TO BELIEVE.
JJ insane1
BigBoyJ
11-07-2005, 05:29 PM
Me stop and think? If you knew what "THINKING" on your own meant then you would not follow the bullshit you are TOLD TO BELIEVE.
JJ insane1
Bush never told me what to think. I look at all the evidence and come to a logical conclusion. So far you haven't shown any real evidence, just posts and links that agree with your opinions.
JJ Insane1
11-07-2005, 05:49 PM
Bush never told me what to think. I look at all the evidence and come to a logical conclusion. So far you haven't shown any real evidence, just posts and links that agree with your opinions.
I posted links to the evidence i backed up.... but lets just forget that... Why dont YOU show me some evidence that those buildings fell like you claim they did.... pancaking ect?
Come on... show me. I want to see PROOF the buildings fell from fire melting the steel causing the pancaking.
NO - your evidence cant be "the 9/11 investigators" said so... sure they said so, but that was because that was there "theory" of what happened.
Show me show me show me
JJ Insane1
BigBoyJ
11-07-2005, 08:23 PM
I posted links to the evidence i backed up.... but lets just forget that... Why dont YOU show me some evidence that those buildings fell like you claim they did.... pancaking ect?
Come on... show me. I want to see PROOF the buildings fell from fire melting the steel causing the pancaking.
NO - your evidence cant be "the 9/11 investigators" said so... sure they said so, but that was because that was there "theory" of what happened.
Show me show me show me
JJ Insane1
I did show you a study done in another country. You didn't agree with it, so you ignored it.
JJ Insane1
11-07-2005, 08:40 PM
I did show you a study done in another country. You didn't agree with it, so you ignored it.
I can show you numerous "studies" done by your side of the story... and numerous studies done by my side of the story. What i am asking for is answers to all the questions your studies cant seem to handle or just wont mention... you know the obvious stuff... not the "scientific" shit.
JJ Insane1
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.