LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 12-04-2009, 06:49 AM   #1
olivelappers

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
510
Senior Member
Default Ricciardo
Haven't heard much about this youngster but today in testing he kicked butt and took names !! So if he didn't have a major car advantage they should probably consider moving him into a testing role this year at Red Bull or even driver at Toro!
olivelappers is offline


Old 12-04-2009, 07:34 AM   #2
realnilkless

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
687
Senior Member
Default
Haven't heard much about this youngster but today in testing he kicked butt and took names !! So if he didn't have a major car advantage they should probably consider moving him into a testing role this year at Red Bull or even driver at Toro!
All these test do is indicate potential but going to F1 now is too soon. He has to learn about car set up - communisctaing with the engineers and hone his race craft steadily.

Next season he will move into FR3.5 and then into GP2 if all goes to plan. There is no rush.

Just as Hulkenberg turned down Ferrari this year to replace Massa so it is the correct decision for F3 champ Ricciardo to njoy his current fun, but move to F1 if and when the time is right.
realnilkless is offline


Old 12-04-2009, 08:36 AM   #3
werkeeque

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
577
Senior Member
Default
Over a second clear of the field tells me he can fine-tune his set-up ability while he's employed.
werkeeque is offline


Old 12-04-2009, 09:16 AM   #4
DrunkMans

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
I wouldn't be surprised if STR dump one of their current drivers halfway through the year and shoehorn Ricciardo in.
DrunkMans is offline


Old 12-04-2009, 09:36 AM   #5
poRmawayncmop

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
664
Senior Member
Default
I'm surprised an Australian didn't start this thread.

You guys are lagging!
poRmawayncmop is offline


Old 12-04-2009, 10:23 AM   #6
realnilkless

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
687
Senior Member
Default
Over a second clear of the field tells me he can fine-tune his set-up ability while he's employed.
Lets not make these Jerez test days more than they are. There is a vast difference between teams doing different things at different times for different reasons.

Ricciardo has potential and that has been evident since his FR2.0 days - but there is a development process that should not be dismissed.

His turn will come in f1. A good example of good management? Nico Hulkenberg. How many drivers would have correctly resisted the temptation to jump into the Ferrari this year to replace Massa? Good man that Hulkenberg in my view.
realnilkless is offline


Old 12-04-2009, 10:28 AM   #7
realnilkless

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
687
Senior Member
Default
I wouldn't be surprised if STR dump one of their current drivers halfway through the year and shoehorn Ricciardo in.
That is the worst idea and Ricciardo should refuse any such solicitation. How can you recommend such an action when as you are aware that no testing outside of the simulator is allowed?

In days past when sense prevailed, a driver like Ricciardo could use his off weeks to test for a team during a season. And it was not unusual for teams to run drivers for an entire grand prix distance each time.

If you really want Ricciardo to succeed let him have his time in FR3.5 and maybe GP2. There really is no rush.
realnilkless is offline


Old 12-04-2009, 11:27 AM   #8
DrunkMans

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
How can you recommend such an action when as you are aware that no testing outside of the simulator is allowed?
Are you suggesting I would recommend it?
DrunkMans is offline


Old 12-04-2009, 08:26 PM   #9
Attaniuri

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
555
Senior Member
Default
I wouldn't be surprised if STR dump one of their current drivers halfway through the year and shoehorn Ricciardo in.
I suspect such scenario as well, it would be very tostesque... though the problem for Ricciardo would be that he is the man, who is going to be dumped mid-2011.
Attaniuri is offline


Old 12-08-2009, 04:17 PM   #10
ibupronec

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
365
Senior Member
Default
I'm surprised an Australian didn't start this thread.

You guys are lagging!
There is no doubting that danny is a talented driver, and could be an F1 candidate of the future, but all of the current crop of rookies (except Kamui Kobayashi) have been, well, disappointing.

I think he needs a bit more experience first in more higher powered machines. I just hope he doesn't do a Davidson/patritzi and come home to the v8supercars.

Give him time, the boy will come good. Just when Webber is on the out (and i hope that day never comes )
ibupronec is offline


Old 12-08-2009, 05:17 PM   #11
amelveEnromma

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
448
Senior Member
Default
There is no doubting that danny is a talented driver, and could be an F1 candidate of the future, but all of the current crop of rookies (except Kamui Kobayashi) have been, well, disappointing.
Buemi says hello...
amelveEnromma is offline


Old 12-08-2009, 05:35 PM   #12
ehib8yPc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
564
Senior Member
Default
Buemi says hello...
As far as I know he was also the only '09 rookie to have done any significant testing before racing.

That alone is such a colossal advantage that there's almost no comparison.
ehib8yPc is offline


Old 12-08-2009, 07:17 PM   #13
EzekelEnzino

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
742
Senior Member
Default
Haven't heard much about this youngster but today in testing he kicked butt and took names !! So if he didn't have a major car advantage they should probably consider moving him into a testing role this year at Red Bull or even driver at Toro!
Testing is just testing, it means nothing in terms of ultimate speed and Badoer is the living proof to that.
EzekelEnzino is offline


Old 12-09-2009, 07:30 AM   #14
werkeeque

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
577
Senior Member
Default
Testing is just testing, it means nothing in terms of ultimate speed and Badoer is the living proof to that.
I'm not ready to say that testing is a CERTAIN way to determine that a driver is ready, but I'm quite sure that it doesn't mean NOTHING. That is, I believe certain things can be illuminated through testing, and that a team can figure out if a driver is up to the task.
werkeeque is offline


Old 12-09-2009, 07:48 AM   #15
ehib8yPc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
564
Senior Member
Default
Testing is just testing, it means nothing in terms of ultimate speed and Badoer is the living proof to that.
The teams can call the shots because they know all the variables and we do not.

Ferrari were not fooled... they knew Badoer's ultimate speed was lacking all along. That's why it took 10 years, 2 injured drivers and a bit of questionable politics from the CEO to get him to finally start a race.
ehib8yPc is offline


Old 12-09-2009, 06:19 PM   #16
Mowselelew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
In days past when sense prevailed, a driver like Ricciardo could use his off weeks to test for a team during a season. And it was not unusual for teams to run drivers for an entire grand prix distance each time.

If you really want Ricciardo to succeed let him have his time in FR3.5 and maybe GP2. There really is no rush.
+1
Mowselelew is offline


Old 12-09-2009, 09:02 PM   #17
maxtp

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
If you really want Ricciardo to succeed let him have his time in FR3.5 and maybe GP2. There really is no rush.
agreed. +2.

drivers need to develop and shouldn't be expected to go from something like F3 or world series by renault straight to F1 (a-la Alguersuari-who only had 1/2 a season in WS by Renault)

A young driver should do at least 1 FULL season in GP2 before being considered for F1 IMO. otherwise you are just taking them on too early (only the absolute greats like Senna can make a jump of 2 series or more straight up to F1 and be a success-but he was different-very different)
maxtp is offline


Old 12-10-2009, 01:20 AM   #18
drislerfottor

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
agreed. +2.

drivers need to develop and shouldn't be expected to go from something like F3 or world series by renault straight to F1 (a-la Alguersuari-who only had 1/2 a season in WS by Renault)

A young driver should do at least 1 FULL season in GP2 before being considered for F1 IMO. otherwise you are just taking them on too early (only the absolute greats like Senna can make a jump of 2 series or more straight up to F1 and be a success-but he was different-very different)
I can think of a couple of more recent champions who jumped straight into F1 from national F3/Formula Renault series. One of them never even won the national series Vettel also skipped the step below F1. While a career path through GP2 might be the optimum, I don't think it's really necessary.

If you look at the guys who have come through GP2 to F1 so far it's been a bit hit and miss. Hamilton and Rosberg were the hits, Glock and Kovaleinen fair to middling, Speed and Piquet Jr both unsuccessful. Glock was in F1 before GP2 as well of course - is he better now than he was at Jordan? Has he benefitted from being in GP2? An arguable point.

If you pitted all the drivers who came through F3000/GP2 against all the drivers who jumped straight up from a lower series I don't think there would be that much in it performance-wise.

The "no in-season testing" idea changed the situation this year, but we might be seeing the back of that one by the end of the week.
drislerfottor is offline


Old 12-10-2009, 02:27 AM   #19
usatramadolusa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
Does anyone know whether or not you should pronounce the second "i" in Ricciardo? Martin Haven called him "Riccardo" all season on the Channel 4 coverage, but after about a dozen variations of "Alguersuari" the year before I don't know whether I should trust his judgment...
usatramadolusa is offline


Old 12-10-2009, 05:02 AM   #20
werkeeque

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
577
Senior Member
Default
I can think of a couple of more recent champions who jumped straight into F1 from national F3/Formula Renault series. One of them never even won the national series Vettel also skipped the step below F1. While a career path through GP2 might be the optimum, I don't think it's really necessary.

If you look at the guys who have come through GP2 to F1 so far it's been a bit hit and miss. Hamilton and Rosberg were the hits, Glock and Kovaleinen fair to middling, Speed and Piquet Jr both unsuccessful. Glock was in F1 before GP2 as well of course - is he better now than he was at Jordan? Has he benefitted from being in GP2? An arguable point.

If you pitted all the drivers who came through F3000/GP2 against all the drivers who jumped straight up from a lower series I don't think there would be that much in it performance-wise.
Finally, someone has an opinion in this thread that's been backed up with some data (I'm including myself in this criticism). Good point and well-supported.
werkeeque is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:50 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity