LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 05-13-2009, 08:49 PM   #21
mymnarorump

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
653
Senior Member
Default
I do think the way things are going prototypes are going to be the racing of the future - you have technical variety in terms of both chassis and engines, multiple tyre manufacturers involved, racing on tracks with character, with manufacturers, specialist constructors and privateers running off the shelf equipment competing side by side. Now if only these aspects could be combined with a single-driver, two-hour format...
mymnarorump is offline


Old 05-13-2009, 08:54 PM   #22
PypeMaypetasy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
636
Senior Member
Default
The problem is other big teams are also threatening to pull out. It could get to a stage where Force India's and the safety car will be the only cars on the track.
Bernd Maylander winning the WDC.

Who would have thought it
PypeMaypetasy is offline


Old 05-13-2009, 08:56 PM   #23
PypeMaypetasy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
636
Senior Member
Default
I can see a breakaway series forming.
Breakaway from the commercial rights holder (FOM and Bernie) possibly but the FIA will still be in charge of regulations ffrom a technical perspective. No option than to stick with the FIA if they want to race
PypeMaypetasy is offline


Old 05-13-2009, 09:11 PM   #24
GaxyGroordrep

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
621
Senior Member
Default
http://www.channel4.com/4car/news/ne...?news_id=19149

Ferrari has issued a statement saying that it 'does not intend entering its cars in the 2010 F1 Championship'.
GaxyGroordrep is offline


Old 05-13-2009, 09:32 PM   #25
Fiesialenp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
644
Senior Member
Default
With the news that Renault have joined the pull-out threat, I find it even more unlikely that the budget cap will happen - unless Renault intend to withdraw anyway for financial reasons and consider this a good excuse.
Fiesialenp is offline


Old 05-13-2009, 09:44 PM   #26
Vikonbarius

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
Indeed..rumours of their demise have been around for a while and with Nissan losing money as well as Renault they could use this as the perfect excuse.
Vikonbarius is offline


Old 05-13-2009, 09:45 PM   #27
RuttyUttepe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
All these articles are saying the same thing.. Ferrari will not be entering their cars in to 2010 championship IF the cap is brought in. This is not a full declaration with the final decision being made.
RuttyUttepe is offline


Old 05-13-2009, 09:52 PM   #28
jyhugikuhih

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
With the old thread gone, I'll try to reprise my opinions.

Ferrari won't (be allowed to) leave. Max may be acting tough with his "sorry to see them go" act, but rest assured his old mate Bernie knows the value of having the brand in F1. A compromise will be found, but probably one which suits the FIA more than Ferrari.

This is also the biggest test so far of FOTA's unity, especially as we approach the May 29th deadline for registering 2010 entries. It only takes one team to crumble and submit their entry and the entire bargaining position is massively weakened with all the others surely falling in line.

However, what's to say that half a dozen new teams won't come along and register? What happens if later in the year the protesting teams decide they're happy to participate but there are no longer any vacant spaces on the grid? Would Max seriously tell Red Bull or BMW that there's no room at the inn?

As I see it, Ferrari's main gripes are that the budget cap is too little and too swift. They also seem concerned that there would be a two-tier championship with, as Patrick Head explained recently, little chance of the uncapped teams being able to spend their way out of trouble.

Of the two objections the budget cap is the easiest to overcome. My suggestions from t'other lost thread were that the cap be phased in, say £200M next year, £120M for 2011, £80M for 2012, then finally Max's proposed target of £40M in 2013. Of course the flaw is that would do little to encourage new teams to enter in the short term.

Whatever, it's vital for the health of F1 that there is never ever ever a two-tier system. I've seen it in touring cars and it's clumsy and ugly, raising suspicions that the governing body is artificially "fixing" race outcomes by giving too little or too much dispensation to one or the other spec cars. There are enough conspiracy theories in F1 as it is, thank you.
jyhugikuhih is offline


Old 05-13-2009, 10:15 PM   #29
Frodogzzz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
535
Senior Member
Default
Bernd Maylander winning the WDC.

Who would have thought it


I remember an interview with him about a year ago when he was asked by a reporter, "wouldnt you rather drive the F1 cars than the safety car?". He cooly replied, "no, because I am always in front of the F1 cars!"
Frodogzzz is offline


Old 05-13-2009, 10:32 PM   #30
Madjostok

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
558
Senior Member
Default
I think not much will happen...

The FIA will have to reconsider this set of stupid rules, and after some negotiating, everything will be on track (trumpet fanfare, please) again.

Anyway, the two tier system is utter nonsense. Is that a way of getting better racing? Is F1 about that? What are the headhonchos trying to do?

What a pile of negative answers!
Madjostok is offline


Old 05-13-2009, 10:33 PM   #31
Madjostok

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
558
Senior Member
Default
oh, sorry... I don´t know what happened, the message appeared 4 times
Madjostok is offline


Old 05-13-2009, 11:38 PM   #32
Badyalectlawl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default


I remember an interview with him about a year ago when he was asked by a reporter, "wouldnt you rather drive the F1 cars than the safety car?". He cooly replied, "no, because I am always in front of the F1 cars!"

He's been first to the chequered flag twice already this season!
Badyalectlawl is offline


Old 05-14-2009, 02:14 AM   #33
22paseabelldaps

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
Why would teams, if they break away, be forced to still be under the FIA?

Is there some legal requirement for them to be under their control?
22paseabelldaps is offline


Old 05-14-2009, 02:19 AM   #34
UvjqTVVC

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
Why would teams, if they break away, be forced to still be under the FIA?

Is there some legal requirement for them to be under their control?
this has been discussed in other threads and i think the conclusion was that almost every circuit is under FIA "certification" (for car racing) meaning FIA approves or disapproved racing on that circuit. Not sure how this work in reality.
UvjqTVVC is offline


Old 05-14-2009, 02:20 AM   #35
RuttyUttepe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
Why would teams, if they break away, be forced to still be under the FIA?

Is there some legal requirement for them to be under their control?
Yes there certainly is I'm afraid
RuttyUttepe is offline


Old 05-14-2009, 02:43 AM   #36
Fiesialenp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
644
Senior Member
Default
I do think the way things are going prototypes are going to be the racing of the future - you have technical variety in terms of both chassis and engines, multiple tyre manufacturers involved, racing on tracks with character, with manufacturers, specialist constructors and privateers running off the shelf equipment competing side by side. Now if only these aspects could be combined with a single-driver, two-hour format...
But it needs a single world championship.
Fiesialenp is offline


Old 05-14-2009, 02:57 AM   #37
onelovemp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
I think not much will happen...

The FIA will have to reconsider this set of stupid rules, and after some negotiating, everything will be on track (trumpet fanfare, please) again.
Spot on. I mean seriously, we all know that Ferrari is not going to leave nor are the other teams except for reasons that have nothing to do with the proposed 2010 regulations.
onelovemp is offline


Old 05-14-2009, 07:32 AM   #38
Ccddfergt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
Sorry Guys but for some reasons the original thread has disappeared, so please let's continue here. Sorry again for the incovenience
Cyber woodpeckers like to leaves holes too.
Ccddfergt is offline


Old 05-14-2009, 01:15 PM   #39
RogHammon

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
598
Senior Member
Default
The problem is other big teams are also threatening to pull out. It could get to a stage where Force India's and the safety car will be the only cars on the track.
Yeah, but Force India would be guaranteed of 2nd and 3rd at every race!
RogHammon is offline


Old 05-14-2009, 01:19 PM   #40
RogHammon

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
598
Senior Member
Default
Of the two objections the budget cap is the easiest to overcome. My suggestions from t'other lost thread were that the cap be phased in, say £200M next year, £120M for 2011, £80M for 2012, then finally Max's proposed target of £40M in 2013. Of course the flaw is that would do little to encourage new teams to enter in the short term.

Whatever, it's vital for the health of F1 that there is never ever ever a two-tier system. I've seen it in touring cars and it's clumsy and ugly, raising suspicions that the governing body is artificially "fixing" race outcomes by giving too little or too much dispensation to one or the other spec cars. There are enough conspiracy theories in F1 as it is, thank you.
That's pretty much what FOTA are saying. They have already put the plan forward, but the Petty Tyrant Max has ignored them.
RogHammon is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 14 (0 members and 14 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity