General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
The whole thing is really baffling.
Apparently Zelaya is from a liberal party, sort of the Honduran equivalent of the Lib Dems in the UK (except in power). That's a long way from Ortega and Chavez. Then there's the whole, trying to become president for life thing. Seems to be popular these days in Latin America. About the only thing Uribe and Chavez have in common is a desire to stay in office. Frankly, I think that he should finish his term, and retire quietly to somewhere in southern France. A nice compromise between the interested parties that preserves their constitution and doesn't result in bloodshed. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
So suppose Bush had said before the GOP primaries "you know what, I'm gonna run for a third term, and to hell with all you naysayers, I'll just hold a referendum to scrap that pesky 22nd Amendment," and the GOP was on board with this decision, but the SCOTUS issues a ruling that the referendum would be unconstitutional (for noncompliance with Article 5, though I'm not aware of any analogue to that in Honduras) and Congress passes a nonbinding resolution that concurs, so Bush just pulls a Jackson and tells the SCOTUS "good luck enforcing it," and in response a regiment from the 82nd Airborne walks into the White House and places him under arrest until after his replacement can be elected and inaugurated. Would that be a "coup," or just enforcement of the Constitution by the last institution standing? There's really no black-letter provision that could clear this up.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
I guess the secret to being rich is to have a small Latin America country, and be critical of the US. And then receive over 200 million dollars in development aid.
![]() While 200 million is a drop in the bucket for the overall economic problems in the US, I'm sure there are better things we could be doing with that money. We should be helping our friends, not countries who want to paint the US as the bad guy for political reasons. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Not really. The legislature could've just ignored his referendum. This was backed by people with $$... more likely than not it's just the same old same old for the govts of Latin America. The referendum is being performed through the state, so the legislature ignoring his referendum would be them turning a blind eye to the gross abuse of executive power.
Not only that, he was trying to use the Army to conduct the referendum. The Army chief, true to the constitution, refused to obey the illegal order and was fired for it (how is that for a change in Latin Americna politics!). This is what prompted the more drastic action, authorized specifically by the other two branches of government. The army in this instance is a perfect example of how true democratic institutions have evolved in that area. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
I think you might want to read the US officer oath if you think that. Deposing the President is most definetly in the scope of the US military if he was pulling something like this guy did. We are not the first instrument to be turned to for sure, but if push comes to shove...
And it would look pretty much just like this. I am curious if there are national law enforcement entities that can be turned to in Honduras, and if they are did they refuse to/proved incabale of deposing the president? It is not uncommon for the militaries of such nations to be a good portion of the national law enforcement apparatus themselves. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
Yeah, I don't consider it a Military Coup unless a General is made president. Or they say the heck with a president and the General is in charge. This seems a bit more gray. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
The legislature then voted a different person as President, and the Army arrested the current President. Apparently, the actions in the previous sentence are beyond their powers in the the current constitution. I believe the legeslature voted in a new president after the old one was deposed.
From the Honduran constitution: Article 42 strips citizenship rights from those who call for the re-election or continuing (beyond the term) of the President of the Republic. Article 239 not only prohibits the re-election of a President of the Republic, but calls for the immediate removal from public office and disqualification from any political office for 10 years any person who calls for a change in that prohibition. Not a litteral quote. The question then is who is responsible for removing the President from office? |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
In the US the military doesn't have policing powers, that's different in other countries. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|