LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-29-2009, 03:09 AM   #1
abishiots

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
553
Senior Member
Default Honduras: Army 1, President 0
The whole thing is really baffling.

Apparently Zelaya is from a liberal party, sort of the Honduran equivalent of the Lib Dems in the UK (except in power). That's a long way from Ortega and Chavez.

Then there's the whole, trying to become president for life thing. Seems to be popular these days in Latin America. About the only thing Uribe and Chavez have in common is a desire to stay in office.

Frankly, I think that he should finish his term, and retire quietly to somewhere in southern France. A nice compromise between the interested parties that preserves their constitution and doesn't result in bloodshed.
abishiots is offline


Old 06-29-2009, 03:30 AM   #2
Keeriewof

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
465
Senior Member
Default
Army

Zelaya

Obama
Keeriewof is offline


Old 06-29-2009, 03:38 AM   #3
nintenda

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
621
Senior Member
Default
this is confusing
nintenda is offline


Old 06-29-2009, 05:59 AM   #4
Zjohkrbi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
So suppose Bush had said before the GOP primaries "you know what, I'm gonna run for a third term, and to hell with all you naysayers, I'll just hold a referendum to scrap that pesky 22nd Amendment," and the GOP was on board with this decision, but the SCOTUS issues a ruling that the referendum would be unconstitutional (for noncompliance with Article 5, though I'm not aware of any analogue to that in Honduras) and Congress passes a nonbinding resolution that concurs, so Bush just pulls a Jackson and tells the SCOTUS "good luck enforcing it," and in response a regiment from the 82nd Airborne walks into the White House and places him under arrest until after his replacement can be elected and inaugurated. Would that be a "coup," or just enforcement of the Constitution by the last institution standing? There's really no black-letter provision that could clear this up.
Zjohkrbi is offline


Old 06-29-2009, 06:30 AM   #5
QvhhbjLy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
373
Senior Member
Default
Army

Zelaya

Obama
It appears Drake likes right-wing dictators but does not like leaders who are chosen by the majority of the citizens.
QvhhbjLy is offline


Old 06-29-2009, 02:14 PM   #6
elektikaka

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
614
Senior Member
Default
And those who seek to rule over them without their consent are described as tyrants.
elektikaka is offline


Old 06-29-2009, 02:40 PM   #7
ImmimiFruff

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
Yeah, I don't consider it a Military Coup unless a General is made president. Or they say the heck with a president and the General is in charge. This seems a bit more gray.
ImmimiFruff is offline


Old 06-29-2009, 04:13 PM   #8
fotochicaes

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
423
Senior Member
Default
I guess the secret to being rich is to have a small Latin America country, and be critical of the US. And then receive over 200 million dollars in development aid.

While 200 million is a drop in the bucket for the overall economic problems in the US, I'm sure there are better things we could be doing with that money. We should be helping our friends, not countries who want to paint the US as the bad guy for political reasons.
fotochicaes is offline


Old 06-29-2009, 04:55 PM   #9
EbrsaRynleot

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
543
Senior Member
Default
It appears Drake likes right-wing dictators but does not like leaders who are chosen by the majority of the citizens.

I like democracy.
EbrsaRynleot is offline


Old 06-29-2009, 05:17 PM   #10
car.insur

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
Not really. The legislature could've just ignored his referendum. This was backed by people with $$... more likely than not it's just the same old same old for the govts of Latin America. The referendum is being performed through the state, so the legislature ignoring his referendum would be them turning a blind eye to the gross abuse of executive power.

Not only that, he was trying to use the Army to conduct the referendum. The Army chief, true to the constitution, refused to obey the illegal order and was fired for it (how is that for a change in Latin Americna politics!). This is what prompted the more drastic action, authorized specifically by the other two branches of government.

The army in this instance is a perfect example of how true democratic institutions have evolved in that area.
car.insur is offline


Old 06-29-2009, 06:11 PM   #11
GrottereewNus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
397
Senior Member
Default
I think you might want to read the US officer oath if you think that. Deposing the President is most definetly in the scope of the US military if he was pulling something like this guy did. We are not the first instrument to be turned to for sure, but if push comes to shove...

And it would look pretty much just like this. I am curious if there are national law enforcement entities that can be turned to in Honduras, and if they are did they refuse to/proved incabale of deposing the president? It is not uncommon for the militaries of such nations to be a good portion of the national law enforcement apparatus themselves.
GrottereewNus is offline


Old 06-29-2009, 06:19 PM   #12
Pharmaciest2007

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
407
Senior Member
Default
Yeah, I don't consider it a Military Coup unless a General is made president. Or they say the heck with a president and the General is in charge. This seems a bit more gray.
Indeed. It is vastly different in this case. Supreme Court and Congress saying the President is violating the Constitution, so the military goes in and deposes the President and turns power back to the Congress.
Pharmaciest2007 is offline


Old 06-29-2009, 06:47 PM   #13
QualityReachOut

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
662
Senior Member
Default
The legislature then voted a different person as President, and the Army arrested the current President. Apparently, the actions in the previous sentence are beyond their powers in the the current constitution. I believe the legeslature voted in a new president after the old one was deposed.

From the Honduran constitution:

Article 42 strips citizenship rights from those who call for the re-election or continuing (beyond the term) of the President of the Republic.

Article 239 not only prohibits the re-election of a President of the Republic, but calls for the immediate removal from public office and disqualification from any political office for 10 years any person who calls for a change in that prohibition. Not a litteral quote. The question then is who is responsible for removing the President from office?
QualityReachOut is offline


Old 06-29-2009, 07:43 PM   #14
Fekliopas

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
331
Senior Member
Default
Patroklos, where did you get that analysis of the Honduran constitutional articles? Good stuff!
Fekliopas is offline


Old 06-29-2009, 08:16 PM   #15
mikeydesignzinc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
On a related note, it is absolutely hilarious listening to Chavez, Morales and Correa talk about military action
mikeydesignzinc is offline


Old 06-29-2009, 08:51 PM   #16
Faigokilix

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
423
Senior Member
Default
On a related note, it is absolutely hilarious listening to Chavez, Morales and Correa talk about military action
Wasn't he suppose to destroy Columbia or some **** last year? Looks like he is afraid of letting his army get too far away from him.
Faigokilix is offline


Old 06-30-2009, 02:35 AM   #17
tq4F7YKs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
463
Senior Member
Default
In the US the military doesn't have policing powers, that's different in other countries.
What Patty said. You're probably thinking of Posse Comitatus, which is only statutory. The officer's oath has an older and arguably more constitutionally established pedigree, which the SCOTUS would surely take into consideration.
tq4F7YKs is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:25 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity