General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
A decent opening, but I'll fork-end your move by alighting at Richmond and place you in Nid. :rubshands:
(Sorry to be a perpetual irritant old chap, but I think you need to append the word 'Line' to the thread title. Speaking as one who has the Northern Line rumbling beneath my flat, just three stops from MC, I feel obliged to clarify this point.) |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
Yes, but together they are a Shackleton Switch. You do know what happened to Shackleton after he pulled his "full jump and double twist", don't you? They must clearly be banned, for the safety of the other players Behind the times ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
I'm aghast at the standard of play so far. I haven't see such amateurish strategies since the ill-fated finals of '92, when the Earl of Chichester won in only three moves.
I feel compelled to skip along to Archway to take advantage of the opportunities afforded by the previous three moves (taken in conjunction). |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Amateurish, bah. There's nothing wrong with playing the field passively for a few moves before striking; Wallsdorf played that strategy to perfection in the 1982 Birkdale finals, for example.
I'll try the classic Wellsley gambit, and roll through to Willesden Junction, protecting the left side while avoiding Duke's block. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|