LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-14-2010, 01:11 AM   #1
hHwJ229h

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default Mustang Boss 302 unveiled for 2012
I like it. So glad they gave the stang a power boost.
hHwJ229h is offline


Old 08-14-2010, 03:59 AM   #2
HottBrorb

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Does it still weight a million kilos ?
HottBrorb is offline


Old 08-14-2010, 09:03 AM   #3
icyfreshy

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
They weigh in th 3400 to 3500 lbs range depending on model/trim. For example, the 370z weighs 3300lbs (seats 2 only, Mustang sits 4) and the Camaro weights in the 3600 to 3800 lbs range.


Old 4.6L V8 vs new 3.7L V6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTvs2z9nCPQ

V8 = 5-Speed 315hp w/ 335torques

The new 3.7L V6 = 6-Speed 305hp w/ 270torques


The V6 is like a 5.1 second vehicle. Nearly as fast as the out going V8 and 350z, almost a second faster than the V6 Camaro which lays down the same kind of power with a 6-Speed as well.


Ford did GREAT with the new engines in the finally awesome looking Mustang.
icyfreshy is offline


Old 08-14-2010, 06:20 PM   #4
Mark_NyB

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
544
Senior Member
Default
Does it still weight a million kilos ?
There've been Euro's outweighing the American cars for many years now - time you woke up to it....
Mark_NyB is offline


Old 08-14-2010, 08:13 PM   #5
RussellPG

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
473
Senior Member
Default
I personally like the look of the black one better.



If I got one of these, I would get a vanity plate that says "LIKABOSS"
RussellPG is offline


Old 08-14-2010, 08:27 PM   #6
mymnarorump

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
653
Senior Member
Default
I personally like the look of the black one better.



If I got one of these, I would get a vanity plate that says "LIKABOSS"
I think that looks sharp too. Nice plate idea too lmao
mymnarorump is offline


Old 08-14-2010, 08:30 PM   #7
JamesTornC

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
319
Senior Member
Default
Pretty nice car, even though it's a Ford.
JamesTornC is offline


Old 08-14-2010, 08:33 PM   #8
mymnarorump

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
653
Senior Member
Default
Pretty nice car, even though it's a Ford.
Ford looks like it's running the show in American right now though.
I think my next vehicle is going to be a Ford. They didn't need a bailout and they are trying really hard to innovate new things and tech which is great to see from an American auto maker :P
mymnarorump is offline


Old 08-14-2010, 09:11 PM   #9
User-Luser

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
Ford looks like it's running the show in American right now though.
I think my next vehicle is going to be a Ford. They didn't need a bailout and they are trying really hard to innovate new things and tech which is great to see from an American auto maker :P
They were bailed out in 2006 just not by the government directly. They were worse off than GM and took a big gamble.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112700263.html


I refuse to own a ford for any reason after all the junk fords we have owned. NEVER had any real problems out of our GM trucks and SUV's.

Here is a prime example. This is my mothers 2002 expedition. Electrical problems from day 1 kicking in and out of 4X4 for no reason, washer fluid light on and off even when its full, randomly gives itself gas at stop lights etc etc. The 5.4 is a weak turd of an engine. The paint on the hood has been peeling off for the last 3 years. The previous 1997 she had wasnt much better and out ford work trucks have all had serious engine troubles and brake problems.




P.S. GM just posted a 1.3 billion dollar profit.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...l?hpid=topnews


As soon as GM starts selling stock I am jumping on it.



EDIT: Almost forgot. GM is thinking about changing the platform of the camaro's to a lighter platform. That might spell a short lived performance advantage that the GT currently has and once again the camaro will outperform the mustang like it has since 1967.
User-Luser is offline


Old 08-14-2010, 10:19 PM   #10
icyfreshy

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
They were bailed out in 2006 just not by the government directly. They were worse off than GM and took a big gamble.
By the Private sector! And at a right time as well. If Ford didn't take the gamble that is paying off big time, government would have forced its way into Ford.
Plus GM got a ridiculous large loan they could have never gotten other wise.

P.S. GM just posted a 1.3 billion dollar profit. Of which they are now, what, on their 3rd CEO sense their bailout? Obama fired the last CEO for making some kind of Government Motors joke, of which is still a legitimate concern. I wouldn't buy anything Chrysler or GM atm, as long as they owe Government and are Socialized companies.
I also wonder how they are cooking up these numbers. We all know how Government has been cooking numbers, they own GM and could be doing the same. I'd be skeptical about this. They already cooked GMs loan payback. GM CEO went out there on TV a while ago saying that GM paid a large chunk of the loan back, like 5+ billion or something like that, but turned out Government gave them a second loan to use to repay the first loan. Something that the CEO didn't tell us when he was on TV. [thumbdown]

EDIT: Almost forgot. GM is thinking about changing the platform of the camaro's to a lighter platform. That might spell a short lived performance advantage that the GT currently has and once again the camaro will outperform the mustang like it has since 1967. Thinking? They NEED to! Going to be awhile if they really are. Going to be hard for GM to shave off 200(base)~400(loaded V8)lbs without the Camaro being solely on its own platform, like the Mustang is.
icyfreshy is offline


Old 08-14-2010, 11:56 PM   #11
Mark_NyB

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
544
Senior Member
Default
I would remind you that FORD were pro-NAZI pre-war, and this continued for some time AFTER America joined the Allies!

Question is, which of a bad bunch are you going to choose?

Mustang does look good, though, in the black with orange trim!
Mark_NyB is offline


Old 08-15-2010, 02:57 AM   #12
maks_holi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
523
Senior Member
Default
Ford has really turned it around over the past decade.

I've never honestly liked any of the domestic automakers, but I'll definitely be considering a Ford when its time to retire my current ride.
maks_holi is offline


Old 08-15-2010, 03:59 AM   #13
Ganoshenko

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
431
Senior Member
Default
EDIT: Almost forgot. GM is thinking about changing the platform of the camaro's to a lighter platform. That might spell a short lived performance advantage that the GT currently has and once again the camaro will outperform the mustang like it has since 1967.
The Camaro has not outperformed the Mustang since 1967 because GM stopped producing the car for approx. 8 years after the 4th generation. I wonder why?

EDIT: I'd also like to add that I'd take a car less than 3000lbs for performance - at the track, problem is that I drive on the street everyday with other people in larger vehicles and anything approaching 3000lbs or below tends to crumple like a tin can, preferably with me not inside.
Ganoshenko is offline


Old 08-15-2010, 09:22 AM   #14
HRS1H7gO

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
459
Senior Member
Default
Plus GM got a ridiculous large loan they could have never gotten other wise.
Kind of like how Ford is able to pay down its debt by getting the government to guarantee new low interest loans. ****ing Commies.

Things aren't paying off big time for Ford. They know they are ****ed if there is a double dip recession. So does the government which is why they are making these moves now.
HRS1H7gO is offline


Old 08-15-2010, 01:45 PM   #15
Mark_NyB

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
544
Senior Member
Default
that was Edsel Ford, not Henry Ford,

Ford didn't take back over the company until I think 43/44 when Edsel died..
So it wasn't FORD, but FORD - in either case it was the company supporting Hitler and NAZIs!

I suggest some checking up on it, there's a lot on the interweb about it as it is well known!
Starters
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Ford
http://www.reformed-theology.org/htm...chapter_06.htm

Ah, seems GM may also be guilty - from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...nazicars30.htm
"But documents discovered in German and American archives show a much more complicated picture. In certain instances, American managers of both GM and Ford went along with the conversion of their German plants to military production at a time when U.S. government documents show they were still resisting calls by the Roosevelt administration to step up military production in their plants at home.

Perhaps you should all be buying Chrysler - oh, wait...
Mark_NyB is offline


Old 08-15-2010, 02:31 PM   #16
StampNews

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
458
Senior Member
Default
So it wasn't FORD, but FORD - in either case it was the company supporting Hitler and NAZIs!

I suggest some checking up on it, there's a lot on the interweb about it as it is well known!
Starters
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Ford
http://www.reformed-theology.org/htm...chapter_06.htm

Ah, seems GM may also be guilty - from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...nazicars30.htm
"But documents discovered in German and American archives show a much more complicated picture. In certain instances, American managers of both GM and Ford went along with the conversion of their German plants to military production at a time when U.S. government documents show they were still resisting calls by the Roosevelt administration to step up military production in their plants at home.

Perhaps you should all be buying Chrysler - oh, wait...
Better off getting a BMW then?
StampNews is offline


Old 08-15-2010, 02:33 PM   #17
Mark_NyB

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
544
Senior Member
Default
Better of getting a BMW then?
One of my cars is an OPEL...

A wise man may forgive the past but only a fool will forget it!
Mark_NyB is offline


Old 08-15-2010, 03:20 PM   #18
Arbinknit

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
458
Senior Member
Default
I would remind you that FORD were pro-NAZI pre-war, and this continued for some time AFTER America joined the Allies!

Question is, which of a bad bunch are you going to choose?

Mustang does look good, though, in the black with orange trim!
I drive a VW, what does that say about me?
Arbinknit is offline


Old 08-15-2010, 04:18 PM   #19
Mark_NyB

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
544
Senior Member
Default
I drive a VW, what does that say about me?
You're going for efficient, economical motoring?
Mark_NyB is offline


Old 08-16-2010, 02:30 AM   #20
RussellPG

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
473
Senior Member
Default
You're going for efficient, economical motoring?
I think he was hinting about the Beetle being designed with contributions from Hitler. He wanted a car that could carry a certain amount of soldiers and machine guns. And VW's close ties to the Nazi's at the time.

So, yes, efficient, economical motoring and ethnic cleansing.
RussellPG is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:40 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity