General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
ok mate you unscrew the lens on a susat sight and take a good lug and then see how far you get |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
You mean 'radio-active'? |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
a typical ad hominem response.. |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
You mean 'radio-active'? ![]() There are three types of radiation, Alpha, Beta and Gamma and generally, Gamma is the one to worry about! Gamma isn't as big a threat as one might think due to the low level of absorption of gamma photons by tissue (hence why its quality factor is much lower than, say, alpha) - so to ascertain the true level of threat one must look at how the radiation will be absorbed, where it will be absorbed and how much energy is transferred. Anyway, in addition to the 3 you've mentioned, there's also neutron, proton, muon, and positron forms of radiation that we all experience on a daily basis. Best not to worry about it all too much! Pretty good source of Gamma in the sky, BTW. Most of that, though, interacts with the atmosphere and very little of it reaches the surface. |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
using the term f**** is not targeting a person or persons? No, it was used as a term of endearment... (maybe not). However, I was certainly not using the term to detract from the lack of point that I was making (which tends to be the use of ad hominem arguments). It was more as a introduction to the proverbial "faggot" that would be surprised to find people that do not know a relatively obscure fact that was brought to public knowledge via a comic book character. |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|