General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#2 |
|
Well Saab is turning around very nicely and I like their current offerings. The Turbo X is also a killer! Plus new models are on their way. Personally I have liked with what they have recently done with Saab. Didn't care for them much till 2003. Buddy has a 2000 Saab and I don't care much for it.
Though I would pick the CTS. CTS won car of the year, and against the 5-Series in a Euro review, CTS won. Plus my buddy owns a 3-series and it isn't very comfortable at all, so with the 5-Series being basically the same, I would expect the same. CTS looks better, cheaper, more power, cheaper maintanance, so how can you so no? |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
So your implying that a car is only good if it's developed in Europe? ![]() Well Saab is turning around very nicely and I like their current offerings. The Turbo X is also a killer! Plus new models are on their way. Personally I have liked with what they have recently done with Saab. Didn't care for them much till 2003. Buddy has a 2000 Saab and I don't care much for it. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
http://media.gm.com/us/gm/en/news/ev...V_Overview.htm
highlights: 550hp 550lb-ft 6 speed manual or auto w/ paddles magnetic ride control recaro racing seats 4200lbs(man)-4300(auto) http://www.autoblog.com/photos/spy-s...-v-undisguised And the interior is something I've fallen in love with after just one picture. http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.au...09ca_ct019.jpg Sure, its not going to be the most able handling car with its weight, however 12's with a 4door family car thats stock sounds good to me. I say it needs a supercharger now. 700hp 4door sedan sounds mighty fine to me. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
I'm wondering why no one jumps in with a light weight car that isn't full of all kinds of "lazy driver" devices and runs away with the highe performance yet easy on gas angle. Caddy or an M5? I like the caddies looks more, and its domestic so its going to be cheaper to maintain in the US. The Caddy will also be cheaper with a msrp of about $60,000 from what I've read, so its about $20,000 cheaper than the M5. In this price class its more about personal taste, if you can afford to drop 60k on a car, you can most likely stretch another 20k out of it. I much prefer the Caddy's looks over the M5. The m5 just feels to bland for me. Then again, seeing as how i won't be affording either of the two for a long, long time I really can't argue. I have driven a CTS-V in 2005 and it was a blast, I also had a chance at a M5. My opportunity to drive both cars came at a press event when they setup auto-x courses in large parking lot. At the same event I got my hands on the 05' GTO, Z06, Z51 vette, several AMG Mercs and BMW's. It was a blast to drive all of them. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Becuase this is a full size family sedan. Its main game is NOT out handling the sports cars. Its got a sporty ride, but it really wouldn't compete with something 1500lbs lighter than itself. It will however cruise with ease even at speeds over 100mph. Weight is not a detriment to terminal speed, only to acceleration, braking, and cornering. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
I love the CTS, always have. It just looks better now.
How typical of this thread that a majority of those who say it's hideous aren't from the US, and the few who like it are from the US. Afaik, Motor Trend gave the CTS the Car of the Year award, even over the BMW M5. Not to say the other cars are hideous. I quite like that Grange posted earlier, and would gladly drive it as I would an M5. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
How typical of this thread that a majority of those who say it's hideous aren't from the US, and the few who like it are from the US. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|