LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-18-2012, 10:23 AM   #1
bikersfan

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
390
Senior Member
Default Fracking!
A month or two ago, anti-fracking was all the rage on facebook from the liberals.
bikersfan is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 10:29 AM   #2
occurrini

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
427
Senior Member
Default
I know nothing about fracking but I'm assuming it's awesome just because liberals are against it. serious.
occurrini is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 11:01 AM   #3
zooworms

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
364
Senior Member
Default
Then again we should all just go full nuclear anyway.
Can't. Liberals.


Nuclear power, GMO, etc. Liberals are the new Luddites.
zooworms is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 11:06 AM   #4
darieBarexish

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default
Can't. Liberals.


Nuclear power, GMO, etc. Liberals are the new Luddites.
You should probably get over this idea that theres a group called liberals who all think the same thing.
darieBarexish is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 11:10 AM   #5
TritteTouff

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
481
Senior Member
Default
That article sounds like it was written by a cheerleader. Is she hot?
TritteTouff is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 02:05 PM   #6
SergeyLisin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default
I'm not one to frack and tell.
SergeyLisin is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 03:28 PM   #7
KlaraNovikoffaZ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Location
USA
Posts
384
Senior Member
Default
yup it's true, people hate fraking because it's not the result of environmental regulationn.

only pussified liberals want things like clean drinking water!



and earthquakes, when did one of those ever hurt anyone?
1. EnCana has put forth several statements severely criticizing the Pavillion report at EnCana.com. . Main criticisms seem to include that the water monitoring wells were drilled into a known natural gas prone area and zone so it's no surprise they found natural gas there. ( this has been a consistent issue for industry. Where people say industry activity introduces natural gas into a water reservoir when it was naturally occurring beforehand. That's why industry typically does water testing before , during and after their activities.. So they can assess if there are impacts on the water). EnCana Also claims that the EPA found chemicals tht EnCana did not use and also found contaminants in a relatively large number of their quality control samples. ( highly purified water which is tested to see if their are any issues with their sampling and testing methods.)

2. Earthquakes.. While a connection based on timing appears to exist, these is not yet much proof as to causation. Three decades of data is really nothing in geological terms and most of these earthquakes are not discernable without modern instrumentation. ... So we truly have very limited data. Personally I am concerned about this one as " don't know" is just that. The spike in seismic activity is something to investigate.
KlaraNovikoffaZ is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 04:23 PM   #8
daasayse

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
361
Senior Member
Default
...resulting in some of the lowest CO2 emissions in 20 years.
I suspect the recession has had a little something to do with that.
daasayse is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 04:57 PM   #9
economex

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
415
Senior Member
Default
I notice that a lot of these fracking "earthquakes" are less than 3.0 magnitude. That's roughly similar to a fat girl taking up tap-dancing.
economex is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 05:30 PM   #10
slowlexrese

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
Just as an aside, earthquakes are a likely outcome whenever you push fluid under pressure into the ground. Like, when you build dams. Fluids get pushed into old faults and lubricate them, causing earthquakes (because they can slide easier) of considerably lower magnitude (because they can slide easier). There is nothing new here.
slowlexrese is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 05:39 PM   #11
zttrftwsq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
Maybe something to do with it, but reduced car usage and energy usage could not possibly account for most of that dip.
Manufacturing output...
zttrftwsq is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 05:44 PM   #12
allvideO

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
665
Senior Member
Default
Here we go:

In a little-noticed technical report, the U.S. Energy Information Agency, a part of the Energy Department, said this month that energy related U.S. CO2 emissions for the first four months of this year fell to about 1992 levels. Energy emissions make up about 98 percent of the total. The Associated Press contacted environmental experts, scientists and utility companies and learned that virtually everyone believes the shift could have major long-term implications for U.S. energy policy.

While conservation efforts, the lagging economy and greater use of renewable energy are factors in the CO2 decline, the drop-off is due mainly to low-priced natural gas, the agency said.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...08-16-22-39-40
allvideO is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 05:53 PM   #13
nofkayalk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default
There's not a lot of fracking going on in Ontario HC...
nofkayalk is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 06:04 PM   #14
valentinesdayyy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
392
Senior Member
Default
No but it seems you believe that everything that helps the environment that is a result of enormous government intervention must be evil, which puts you in the same league as Speer. Congrats !
This.
valentinesdayyy is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 06:07 PM   #15
ChrisGoldstein

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
520
Senior Member
Default
Since you have more enthusiasm for this than me....

See if you can find some power consumption numbers for the same time period.
ChrisGoldstein is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 06:16 PM   #16
M_Marked

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
563
Senior Member
Default
I'm not so hard on HC. He's a good boy.

I too was pretty ideologically rigid when I was a student and knew everything.
M_Marked is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 06:21 PM   #17
tgs

Join Date
Mar 2007
Age
47
Posts
5,125
Senior Member
Default
This could be a complete misunderstanding on my part, but I understood they were refusing to provide full breakdowns to the regulators as well. It's understandable if its just not wanting to give trade secrets to competitors, but surely the people monitoring the industry need to know that stuff?
I'm not certain, but I believe the Freedom of Information Act would effectively give competitors access to that same information.
tgs is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 08:32 PM   #18
rozalinasi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
Asher is only saying that as a shill for Albertan oil.
rozalinasi is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 08:41 PM   #19
FsQGF1Mp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
Still butthurt over your econ thrashing the other day?
FsQGF1Mp is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 08:53 PM   #20
Shootohoist

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
I know nothing about fracking but I'm assuming it's awesome just because liberals are against it. serious.
If you want to drink toxic water, that is your choice. Just don't force the rest of us to drink toxic water.
Shootohoist is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:31 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity