I love Tarantino's work so it would depend on the cast and how the movie seems to appeal to me. If it looks great and has a lot of story to tell then split it up. If he appears to be splitting it up to try and bring in more revenue I would be far from happy but at this point it is just a rumor to begin with.

As I said, I'm going to wait to see a cast and more information on the movie itself before making and snap judgements.

I don't know about this yet, but I think splitting up Kill Bill was a good idea. If it was one movie, a lot of people probably would have got bored of it. I think it would have been almost 4 hours long; that's a bit much.

I didn't know Madsen was in Sin City; that's going to kick some serious ass. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...ilies/cool.png

JUNE FUCKING 3rd....sorry way off topic there, i assumed sin city would be about the same time here as the US, what a fucking rip.

Anyway as for IB, two parts, i dunno, after my disapointment at kill bill, i don't want him to go down the same avenue.

Tarantino's "Inglorious Bastards" in Multiple Parts?
 

Man that would suck if it's in two parts. Either way the movie going to own, but i've waited long enough for this movie, and now i'll have to wait even longer for both parts.

Agreed. It can be tedious watching a film for hours on end. If the end product is better from splitting into two rather than having one longer film, then that's the way to go. Personally I'd rather it be one, but if it's too long and is released in two parts there's no way I wouldn't still go and see it.