Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
[You cannot see the link as you're not logged in. Click here to login or here to register.]
Photo [You cannot see the link as you're not logged in. Click here to login or here to register.] [You cannot see the link as you're not logged in. Click here to login or here to register.]. Here in the US, Congressional Democrats have reversed not one but both bad decisions on the role of the arts in the economic stimulus package. Provisions that would have blocked any stimulus funds from reaching arts centers, museums, and theaters have been dropped. (Golf courses and casinos are still in the ban. Maybe this time, someone read the actual legislation.) And the US$50 million (out of some $800 billion) that would go to the National Endowment for the Arts, dropped from a Senate version, has been restored to the bill. It appears both of those changes not only cleared the House but are part of the Senate version that’s in votes as I write this. If you believe artists shouldn’t rely exclusively on government funding, you can still celebrate. The arts will receive far less of a handout than a lot of other industries — and do more with it. Arts advocacy groups estimate that for every dollar of the NEA money, another seven dollars will come from public and private supporters. What the tiny amount of federal spending does is make up for shortfalls in lean times, protecting an arts sphere that depends on a variety of sources for revenue. Nearly 15,000 real jobs could be saved by those same estimates. That means an arts infrastructure in the US that can remain healthy and independent. But the important story here has nothing to do with the stimulus bill, or even the US. It’s that public outcry from people like you rescued this legislation. And if public support can do that, it can do a lot more for the arts, not only in federal spending but other key areas. [You cannot see the link as you're not logged in. Click here to login or here to register.] says supporters from its organization alone sent some 100,000 messages and letters to their Members of Congress. That’s not counting the many more letters and phone calls from constituents, not to mention letters to the editor and press attention. Here’s one example from CDM comments, by [You cannot see the link as you're not logged in. Click here to login or here to register.]: I heard the congressman from Nashville (!) talking down the $50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts. I immediately called his office and let his staffers know that (blue dog democrat Cooper) was full of hot air on this issue. As a synthesist, jazz musician and former NEA artist-in-residence I had the facts and anecdotes to make my points clear. If Rush Limbaugh can get his folks to call, we can at least counteract them with some facts and persistence. Call them, they listen, they respond to numbers. More background on today’s developments: [You cannot see the link as you're not logged in. Click here to login or here to register.] [Los Angeles Times] [You cannot see the link as you're not logged in. Click here to login or here to register.] [Bloomberg, including various other details] To all of you who were active, and to our elected representatives who got this right, thanks. [You cannot see the link as you're not logged in. Click here to login or here to register.] |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|