[Emapymosy]

Internet Explorer users 'have below-average IQ'
Monday 01 August 2011

PC World reports that a "psychometric consulting" firm called AptiQuant gave free online IQ tests to 100,000 people, and then plotted the scores against the browser on which the tests were taken.

It found that Internet Explorer users scored lower than average, while Chrome, Firefox and Safari users were very slightly above average. Camino, Opera and Internet Explorer with Chrome Frame were scored "exceptionally" high.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technolog...verage-IQ.html

I think we already knew that.

[artkolkovk]

Ultimate pwnd!

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/intern...s-a-hoax/53845

Internet Explorer users 'stupid': Story was a hoax

Breathe a sigh of relief. Internet Explorer users are not “kind of stupid”, according to articles thrown around by the media over the last few days.

The story was an elaborate hoax.

Capturing the eyes of major news organisations, including the BBC News, our sister site CBS News and, well, ZDNet too, the false story spread like wildfire, until it was revealed today that the story was untrue.

Canadian firm ApTiquant ‘commissioned’ the report, stating that research connecting a users’ browser choice is affected by the cognitive ability of the user. By connecting a users’ IQ score against their common browser choice, a correlation was made between lower IQ scores and using Microsoft’s Internet Explorer browser.

Stating that it had invited over 100,000 web users to take part in the research, many researchers would have alarm bells ringing. Not only would this is an extraordinarily difficult task to complete, but the data results would be so vast, it could take years to find any meaningful results.

Alarm bells rung when nobody had heard of the company before, sending many on a quest of journalistic intent, to discover whether or not this story was in fact true or not. Many simply ignored the story.

Some people were so incensed by the news, that they threatened legal action against the Canadian based company.

But as the BBC backpedal today, it became clear that the company’s website was only set up within the past month and images of staff were duplicated from a legitimate business in Paris.

Not all research is as accurate or as empirical as others. Whether this was merely a marketing stunt, or someone wanting to get a long running myth off their chest in the most public way possible — it is unclear.

Nobody from ApTiquant was — understandably — available for comment.