LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 11-01-2011, 05:35 AM   #1
D6b2v1HA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default Darker skinned people, majority??
Are the darker skinned people of the world majority in terms of population?
D6b2v1HA is offline


Old 11-01-2011, 06:04 AM   #2
toopyimport

Join Date
Oct 2005
Location
Mauritius
Posts
463
Senior Member
Default
It depends on what you consider dark skinned or light skinned.

white/yellow vs. brown/black? white vs. everybody else? black vs. everybody else?
toopyimport is offline


Old 11-01-2011, 06:17 AM   #3
Spalax

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
508
Senior Member
Default
Are the darker skinned people of the world majority in terms of population?
yes..
The fairer skinned types are relatively rare seen cause they mainly exist in Germany Denmark Sweden Iceland Great Brittain Belgium Scottland Ireland Norway (with some Exceptions) and some of them in France except those with med dna.
At all light skinned people are the minority..
Africa and all the other yellow Countries in the East are the Majority.
Spalax is offline


Old 11-02-2011, 08:19 AM   #4
NanoGordeno

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
Clearly real Northwest European whites are not a majority. I don't think they ever have been on a global level.

Nobody actually considers East Asians the same white as Northwest Europeans but that they represent another realm of white so to speak in their own right racially. So yes if you consider yellow another face of white then no black skinned people are not the majority. If you don't then absolutely black or dark skinned people are the majority.
NanoGordeno is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 10:50 AM   #5
24MurinivaMak

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
It depends on what you consider dark skinned or light skinned.

white/yellow vs. brown/black? white vs. everybody else? black vs. everybody else?
Basically most of africa, except maybe some parts of north africa, arabia, most of south asia and south east asia. I dont consider yellow race dark
24MurinivaMak is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 11:16 AM   #6
Ygxejxox

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
483
Senior Member
Default
By darker skin do you mean black or what?

Because if you do i have to ask why are East Asians included in the "darkzone".

Some of them are no darker than Mediterraneans.



Unless this is about hair/eye color
Ygxejxox is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 11:22 AM   #7
cristmiff

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
561
Senior Member
Default
Looking the population of India, Nigeria and Pakistan? Obviously so. In the grand scheme darker skin is more favorable than recessive lighter skin however, from a purely biological perspective and so it has benefits.
cristmiff is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 11:23 AM   #8
CarrieSexy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
I was talking to this person and they surprised me when I realized how big africas population is..

I thought they were these poor small villages in need, but in reality they are maybe having more kids than they can afford to take care of with a population of 1 Billion.

Which scared me to think that that is the case if you compare it to the population of South America which is 300 Million.

I always thought Latinos had the most kids, under Asians, but it looks like I was wrong.
CarrieSexy is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 11:23 AM   #9
accotMask17

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
333
Senior Member
Default
By darker skin do you mean black or what?

Because if you do i have to ask why are East Asians included in the "darkzone".

Some of them are no darker than Mediterraneans.



Unless this is about hair/eye color
any dark skin colour
accotMask17 is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 11:25 AM   #10
DoctorWeryDolt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
373
Senior Member
Default
well are Syrians and Spaniards and Japanese considered dark or not?

I don't really consider them dark.
DoctorWeryDolt is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 11:25 AM   #11
Bvghbopz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
528
Senior Member
Default
My grandma wasn't "brack" as she would say. Definitely yellow though. There are a variety of skin tones in East Asia, Southeast Asia, South Asia, Central Asia, West Asia, Latin America... so diverse I'm not sure how to divide it by region or nation on a light vs dark basis.
Bvghbopz is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 11:27 AM   #12
putza

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
383
Senior Member
Default
well are Syrians and Spaniards and Japanese considered dark or not?

I don't really consider them dark.
no they are not, they actually have to look dark to be considered dark
putza is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 11:28 AM   #13
BoBoMasterDesign

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
The calculation is simple here.

Population Europe
731 million
population Africa
1 Billion
Population India
1 Billion
Population USA
300 Million
Population Canada
34 Million
Population Indonesia
237 Million
Population Bangladesh
142 Million

There are 24 million Christians in india
but they are only 2% of the population.
BoBoMasterDesign is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 11:29 AM   #14
gkihueonhjh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
407
Senior Member
Default
actually this is good map to show what i am talking about, basically any of the light brown to dark brown regions would be considered dark:



---------- Post added 2011-11-04 at 03:29 ----------

^ ofcourse for Australia its only talking about Aborignals there, not the white folks
gkihueonhjh is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 11:31 AM   #15
gSjQEEmq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
451
Senior Member
Default
I consider "light" countries as in "white" to be most of Europe and Northeast Asia and colonized Euro colonies with a majority Euro population.
gSjQEEmq is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 11:32 AM   #16
quottrethew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
There would have to be an example of what dark means to the OP so people know what they're basing their answers on.
quottrethew is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 11:34 AM   #17
Blacksheepaalredy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
that chart is skipping the huge black population of Brazil
Blacksheepaalredy is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 11:39 AM   #18
asivisepo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
456
Senior Member
Default
Yeah and it seems to whitewash Native Americans while representing Australia as fully indigenous?
asivisepo is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 11:42 AM   #19
downtowndude

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
Yeah and it seems to whitewash Native Americans while representing Australia as fully indigenous?
I think the map is based before 500 years ago, before european colonization
downtowndude is offline


Old 11-04-2011, 11:52 AM   #20
Doctor-CTAC

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Right. Thats what Australia would indicate. However, unmixed Native Americans were darker than what is represented there I think, and their darker skin tone not concentrated in the desert southwest. You live in Canada, right? How would you judge darker Natives you have seen there? I've seen some pretty dark northern plains and west coast Natives in the USA and thats with a lot of Euro mix.
Doctor-CTAC is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:09 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity