Who's better? - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**Janny2006** · 11-13-2005, 07:00 AM

i'm in the middle of an argument with a fan over on the shit boards.

here's the question,Who is the better receiver Nate Burleson or Roy Williams?

Roy Williams by a landslide. This shouldnt really be up for discussion.

**sydramySweame** · 11-15-2005, 07:00 AM

Burleson has Culpepper, Williams has Harrington...if the numbers are even close you have to give the advantage to Williams.

ehh

i could care less

i think ti's too early to say right now

**SkHukV3N** · 01-18-2006, 07:00 AM

by a landslide?

based on what?

**BCVB9SOc** · 02-03-2006, 07:00 AM

by a landslide?

based on what?

opinion....

**antiggill** · 02-12-2006, 07:00 AM

i'm in the middle of an argument with a fan over on the shit boards.

here's the question,Who is the better receiver Nate Burleson or Roy Williams?

which roy williams?

**aAaBecker** · 05-03-2006, 07:00 AM

I like burelson but i'm a vike fan

it's hard to say, both are young and have shown a lot of flashes, but nate is only one witha 1000 yard season under his belt

he also lead the league in YAC last year

Burleson has Culpepper, Williams has Harrington...if the numbers are even close you have to give the advantage to Williams.

**nitivearchit** · 05-06-2006, 07:00 AM

A better question is why waste your time over there?

**erepsysoulptnw** · 05-16-2006, 07:00 AM

i'd take roy. but then again, i don't get a chance to watch either of them on a consistant basis to really know which one of them is better.

**ROYMANgo** · 06-25-2006, 07:00 AM

Nate has shown more so far. Roy probably has more top-end potential.

Nate's a Cris Carter type, just get the job done, move the chains, a professional.

Roy's (potentially) a Randy Moss type, big plays, get into the mind of the defense, alter the way the other team plays the game.

A better question is who's better CC or Moss? That I don't know.

**Talicoabilk** · 07-31-2006, 07:00 AM

by a landslide?

based on what?

Potential + ability. Burelson is a nice player but hes not a #1. Burelson is solid when you need a first down; Williams is the guy you want if you want a true gamebreaker. Williams has the ability to be a star. Thats why you get taken in the top 10. Thats why you get compared to other great wr's

**Seiblybiozy** · 08-29-2006, 07:00 AM

I like burelson but i'm a vike fan

it's hard to say, both are young and have shown a lot of flashes, but nate is only one witha 1000 yard season under his belt

he also lead the league in YAC last year

**Pznrrmaf** · 09-05-2006, 07:00 AM

Why argue something that can't be proven due to the lack of long term statistics?

I find them both to be dime-a-dozen receivers.

**sportlife** · 09-21-2006, 07:00 AM

i'm in the middle of an argument with a fan over on the shit boards.

here's the question,Who is the better receiver Nate Burleson or Roy Williams?

11-13-2005, 07:00 AM	#1
Janny2006 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 471 Senior Member	i'm in the middle of an argument with a fan over on the shit boards. here's the question,Who is the better receiver Nate Burleson or Roy Williams? Roy Williams by a landslide. This shouldnt really be up for discussion. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-15-2005, 07:00 AM	#2
sydramySweame Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 422 Senior Member	Burleson has Culpepper, Williams has Harrington...if the numbers are even close you have to give the advantage to Williams. ehh i could care less i think ti's too early to say right now Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-18-2006, 07:00 AM	#3
SkHukV3N Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 455 Senior Member	by a landslide? based on what? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

02-03-2006, 07:00 AM	#4
BCVB9SOc Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 457 Senior Member	by a landslide? based on what? opinion.... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

02-12-2006, 07:00 AM	#5
antiggill Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 425 Senior Member	i'm in the middle of an argument with a fan over on the shit boards. here's the question,Who is the better receiver Nate Burleson or Roy Williams? which roy williams? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

05-03-2006, 07:00 AM	#6
aAaBecker Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 509 Senior Member	I like burelson but i'm a vike fan it's hard to say, both are young and have shown a lot of flashes, but nate is only one witha 1000 yard season under his belt he also lead the league in YAC last year Burleson has Culpepper, Williams has Harrington...if the numbers are even close you have to give the advantage to Williams. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

05-06-2006, 07:00 AM	#7
nitivearchit Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 523 Senior Member	A better question is why waste your time over there? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

05-16-2006, 07:00 AM	#8
erepsysoulptnw Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 503 Senior Member	i'd take roy. but then again, i don't get a chance to watch either of them on a consistant basis to really know which one of them is better. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-25-2006, 07:00 AM	#9
ROYMANgo Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 523 Senior Member	Nate has shown more so far. Roy probably has more top-end potential. Nate's a Cris Carter type, just get the job done, move the chains, a professional. Roy's (potentially) a Randy Moss type, big plays, get into the mind of the defense, alter the way the other team plays the game. A better question is who's better CC or Moss? That I don't know. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-31-2006, 07:00 AM	#10
Talicoabilk Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 440 Senior Member	by a landslide? based on what? Potential + ability. Burelson is a nice player but hes not a #1. Burelson is solid when you need a first down; Williams is the guy you want if you want a true gamebreaker. Williams has the ability to be a star. Thats why you get taken in the top 10. Thats why you get compared to other great wr's Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

08-29-2006, 07:00 AM	#11
Seiblybiozy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 587 Senior Member	I like burelson but i'm a vike fan it's hard to say, both are young and have shown a lot of flashes, but nate is only one witha 1000 yard season under his belt he also lead the league in YAC last year Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-05-2006, 07:00 AM	#12
Pznrrmaf Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 361 Senior Member	Why argue something that can't be proven due to the lack of long term statistics? I find them both to be dime-a-dozen receivers. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-21-2006, 07:00 AM	#13
sportlife Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 388 Senior Member	Who's better? i'm in the middle of an argument with a fan over on the shit boards. here's the question,Who is the better receiver Nate Burleson or Roy Williams? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)