Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
The two Brawns were powered by Mercedes-Benz (even though from the outside you can't tell) and Hamilton's McLaren was MB powered.
I'm taking a wild stab in the dark here and I'm going to suggest that the last time we had a 1-2-3 for an engine manufacturer was back in 1997 at the British GP when Villeneuve's Williams and the two Benettons of Alesi and Wurz finished second and third. Am I wrong? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
you are - and I'm being a tad anoracky here - IIRC correctly the Renault in the Williams was called Mecachrome and the ones in the Benetton were called Playlife
![]() But you're right, it has been quite a while that a manufacturer has swept the rostrum, although many around here share the opinion that the penalty against Trulli, that got Lewis the 3rd place was at least rather questionable. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
you are - and I'm being a tad anoracky here - IIRC correctly the Renault in the Williams was called Mecachrome and the ones in the Benetton were called Playlife Was that anorakier ? |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
The two Brawns were powered by Mercedes-Benz (even though from the outside you can't tell) and Hamilton's McLaren was MB powered. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
Renault was privatised in 1996 and supplied engines for 1997. Mecachrome & Playlife appeared in 1998 and apart from Hill's win in the Jordan in Belgium, only McLarens and Ferraris won anything else. Of course Renault didn't stay away for long and Benetton at least since 1995 have always had a Renault engine in the back. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Because Mercedes is closer tied to McLaren. They own a substantial stake in the team AFAIK, while Brawn and Force India are just regular customers. It's very true that McLaren and Mercedes are very closely associated, and you wonder if it came down to it, who Mercedes is going to help?! I doubt they'd have a problem with Brawn winning in 2009, especially if McLaren can't. But if it came down to a straight contest between the two? |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
But if it came down to a straight contest between the two? |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
It's very true that McLaren and Mercedes are very closely associated, and you wonder if it came down to it, who Mercedes is going to help?! To be honest, I think the Brawns would be exactly where they are whichever engine they had in the back, especially since the engine freeze, so it's not really an issue! |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
So if the government will have to take it back because of the economic downturn than it will be business like usual. ![]() Louis Renault himself probably had his neck broken by officials of the Third Republic as retribution for his factories building trucks for the Third Reich. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
They days, where you get a new engine upgrade every week are gone. Since you have to run 3-4 races on the same machinery, it wouldn't make sense either.
I think Brawns Mercs are the same as McLarens, maybe apart from some minor detail. As a manufacturer, you wouldn't seriously give another team a worse engine deliberately, would you? After all Merc isn't running a "full team" like BMW or Renault. They are percieved as the engine manufacturer, even in McLarens case, so the more horses they've got running in the race the better. Once McLaren get their act together, they effectively have 4 Merc powered cars shooting for a win. This weekend, apart from the brilliant drive of Hamilton and the rather luckily gained podium, the weekend wasn't certainly the best one McLaren ever had, and yet still good ol' Norbert could gloat all saturday, that Merc powered cars swept the front row of the grid - for Mercedes this was one epically good weekend. OT: Why is it that you can't get a shot of the McLaren garage, without that creepy father of Lewis lurking around - this guy really gets annoying. :S |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|