LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-11-2010, 03:33 AM   #1
bUqLfXRI

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
579
Senior Member
Default Canadian who made Heraclitus style comment called me son of a *****
Just cousin.

I'm not sure what I would have done.
bUqLfXRI is offline


Old 06-11-2010, 04:11 AM   #2
seawolferr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default
He had it coming.
seawolferr is offline


Old 06-11-2010, 09:56 AM   #3
bromgeksan

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
374
Senior Member
Default
Years of experience on Poly should show that people get the most angry when you clearly point out how stupid whatever they are saying is.
bromgeksan is offline


Old 06-11-2010, 10:55 AM   #4
Xewksghy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
504
Senior Member
Default
I wonder if the ancient Romans blamed modernity for decadence too.
Xewksghy is offline


Old 06-11-2010, 11:35 AM   #5
Sheefeadalfuh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
417
Senior Member
Default
It all depends on how you said it and phrased it, and the tone.
Perhaps these things were really worrying for him back then.
Everybody is inconsistence in many ways. No need to always rub that in people's faces by using very personal and emotional examples. And that's why I can't answer your question without knowing how you exactly phrased it.

But since you said:
He was talking about the world cup, and hot it was just a modern replacement for war, all about nationalism and not about enjoying a sport.

I can only conclude that you are apparently a very cynical person, so my prejustice says that you made a very cynical comment about his grandchildren, which explains his response.

Then the answer would be: apologize and say that you got carried a bit too far away in the conversation.
Sheefeadalfuh is offline


Old 06-11-2010, 12:20 PM   #6
avdddcxnelkaxz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
I was particularly thinking of them, yes.

I think Socrates has a good rant about the youth of today in The Republic too...
avdddcxnelkaxz is offline


Old 06-11-2010, 02:16 PM   #7
downtowndude

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
+1

You just pointed out his inconsistency. You didn't suggest the world would somehow be improved if his relatives had died, he did, he just didn't realize it. If he was rational he wouldn't be offended.
I'm extremely consistent and believe the world would be improved if everyone's relatives died. Especially you.
downtowndude is offline


Old 06-11-2010, 02:21 PM   #8
Fertionbratte

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
368
Senior Member
Default
I mentioned that his son's wife, my cousin, had all their babies in preterm births, and 200 years ago all those babies would have died and he would have no grandchildren.

He got very offende and called me son of a *****.

What would you have done in that situation?
Tell him he's a decadent whiner who shouldn't have lived beyond the age of 5 only to moan how the past was oh so great when people died young.
Fertionbratte is offline


Old 06-11-2010, 02:23 PM   #9
Ervntewc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
531
Senior Member
Default
Sig material.

ACK!
Ervntewc is offline


Old 06-11-2010, 05:54 PM   #10
wpFWNoIt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default
Punch him in the face and keep screaming "What did you say?!! What did you say?!!!" until he rescinds. That way he can save face.
wpFWNoIt is offline


Old 06-11-2010, 09:36 PM   #11
sciectotacype17

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
385
Senior Member
Default
There are some nice quotes from Aristotles about that
And did the polis Aristotle's ideal last much after his death? Or was he right in his rants and Greeks became passive subjects with fewer rights in vast empires like most other peoples?
sciectotacype17 is offline


Old 06-11-2010, 09:40 PM   #12
jurhoonee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
561
Senior Member
Default
Well they kind of had a point since bothc civs became decadent and stagnated.

Esp. Rome is a bad example to this argument since they where overrun by:

a) A puritanically Middle Eastern Cult whose followers breed like forest bunnies and then opressed native beliefs once they gained the majority

and

b) Barbarian contractors who where used to fill vacant positions in the state (esp military needs).
I don't think Greece's decline had much to do with decadence, esp. not if we talk about the classical polis world. Their decline was mainly due to never-ending inter-polis conflict culminating in the Peloponnesian War.

Depending what we regard as 'decadent' we could say major Greek polis like Athens or Thebes had a good deal of 'decadence' long before their decline. Sparta stagnated because of silly elitism leading to a situation where military losses could have devastating consequences because there simply weren't enough Spartiates to replace these losses, and they were unwilling and/or unable to open up their society to get more full citizens.

Later Hellenistic states simply couldn't compete in the long run with Rome as the new emerging ancient 'superpower'.

As for Rome, "decadence" is a common, but in the end only one possible explanation amongst many others for Rome's decline.
jurhoonee is offline


Old 06-11-2010, 10:58 PM   #13
hoarrimilsora

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
624
Senior Member
Default
a) A puritanically Middle Eastern Cult whose followers breed like forest bunnies and then opressed native beliefs once they gained the majority
Well I'm certainly glad that's not happening in Europe!
hoarrimilsora is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:18 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity