General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
ok. now take that thought and ponder that civ 4 took all the aspects of 3 i liked and threw them away and enhanced the parts i hated I haven't played Civ IV this year, haven't really had much time for gaming this year |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
I played and loved Civ II the most. I've dabbled with Civ IV a bit, but never got into it as much as Civ II. In the interim, I've moved beyond the Civ franchise, since none of my newer computers are capable of playing Civ II (they're too new, if that makes any sense).
Is there a Civ V coming out, eventually? I'm not averse to returning to the franchise. Gatekeeper |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
I liked Civ III, but unlike AAHZ, I think Civ IV is a better overall game. I still play Civ IV, but almost never the regular game - either I play the fantasy Mod Fall from Heaven 2, which is excellent, or one of the Revolution mods - which introduces into Civ something I thought was always missing, internal revolts. Having half your empire revolt and become a new civ is not always the most fun, but it makes the game much more challenging. It also leads to there being ridiculous numbers of civs, as big empires fracture if they are badly managed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
CivFanatics has a variety of them - the base one and further modifications. The one I play is:
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=292578 I should add that one change that is also very significant is variable culture borders that can be changed by success in war. Certainly makes the game feel more dynamic. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|