LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 04-30-2006, 07:00 AM   #21
skupaemauto

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
417
Senior Member
Default
We like to pretend that corporations don't actually own the government.
skupaemauto is offline


Old 05-03-2006, 07:00 AM   #22
emuffette

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default
You've got an education coming, if you think the tall buildings will lower real estate prices in London.
emuffette is offline


Old 05-07-2006, 07:00 AM   #23
crestorinfo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
this one is interesting. Paris in the fog

crestorinfo is offline


Old 05-24-2006, 07:00 AM   #24
unishisse

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
431
Senior Member
Default Skyscrapers in London
Of course, English Heritage are kicking up a fuss about these obscuring the London skyline, but I think they are a bunch of fuddy-duddy Luddite tw@ts
unishisse is offline


Old 06-10-2006, 07:00 AM   #25
crycleascentyv

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
577
Senior Member
Default
Smiley, I assume from your description that net floor area ratio is calculated as total usable space/footprint?
crycleascentyv is offline


Old 06-16-2006, 07:00 AM   #26
PrareeLor

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
400
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Dis
this one says it's in London. I'm not sure where.

That's Docklands...there's another bunch of them there...
PrareeLor is offline


Old 06-28-2006, 07:00 AM   #27
Immonnaornach

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
394
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Starchild
And the best part is that we're not building just metal and glass blocks. Someone in the Observer commented that London is starting to look like the European version of Shanghai with its style of skyscrapers. eh, I don't know if the Shanghai comparison is desirable, they've got some really tacky stuff over there.
Immonnaornach is offline


Old 07-05-2006, 07:00 AM   #28
Lenkapuppia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
i hope Prince Charles gets involved in this discussion
Lenkapuppia is offline


Old 07-22-2006, 07:00 AM   #29
Fhgzmftq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
352
Senior Member
Default
London Bridge Tower
Fhgzmftq is offline


Old 07-26-2006, 07:00 AM   #30
TubOppomo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Dis
Is there anything better than a beer colored hotel? A beer colored river.
TubOppomo is offline


Old 08-27-2006, 07:00 AM   #31
drlifeech

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
374
Senior Member
Default
Of course I don't work in a planning department, I have a proper job...

And people say worse things about me every day. You should grow a sense of humour
drlifeech is offline


Old 09-14-2006, 07:00 AM   #32
syncFisee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
472
Senior Member
Default
Paris has the fewest skyscrapers of any major city yet one of the highest population densities.

This is because once you go above around 10 floors, net floor area ratio (usable space) increases very slowly, as services, especially elevators, take up more space, buildings need to be stepped back to meet zoning codes so whole neighborhoods aren't in the shadows all day, structural columns get big, etc.

Net floor area ratios above 10 are exceedingly rare, even in Manhattan.

Typical European blocks of around 8-10 stories, built to the lot lines, and with a light court in the back, get around a net area of 5.
syncFisee is offline


Old 09-15-2006, 07:00 AM   #33
9enackivegliva

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by C0ckney
i hate it when this happens, but i agree with molly.
You're allowed to be right occasionally too.
9enackivegliva is offline


Old 09-21-2006, 07:00 AM   #34
DeilMikina

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
609
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Asher
Skyscrappers f*cking rule! Quoted for TRUTH!
DeilMikina is offline


Old 10-04-2006, 07:00 AM   #35
Mangoman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
650
Senior Member
Default
I don't think they could get enough footprint space to have a solid skyline like NYC, which is not a bad thing.

I am curious as to what they are knocking down to get the property to build on.
Mangoman is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:25 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity