LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 11-16-2008, 11:25 PM   #1
LomodiorCon

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default Question about Obscure gays and Ugly lesbians
Well, there's what's her name.
LomodiorCon is offline


Old 11-16-2008, 11:35 PM   #2
vosteglog

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Aeson
Um... by "obscure" does that mean they're in the closet (without obviously being in the closet)? Because if so it would seem to be a given that they can't be readily found out (if they do exist). No, by obscure I just mean relatively unknown.
vosteglog is offline


Old 11-17-2008, 08:29 PM   #3
Clolmemaexata

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
The entertainment industry does not thrive on "relatively unknown" people, so half your question is automatically answered. As to the second part, who would watch a show or go to a movie to see plain and/or ugly people in the popular roles. Thus all the different, non-evil communities (including heterosexuals) are much better looking than any corresponding groups in real life. (Nerds are an exception to this mostly.)
Clolmemaexata is offline


Old 11-17-2008, 11:11 PM   #4
Afigenatjola

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
376
Senior Member
Default
Or gay heterophobes.
Afigenatjola is offline


Old 11-17-2008, 11:50 PM   #5
Mappaindy

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
477
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Darius871
No, by obscure I just mean relatively unknown. You're asking why it's hard to find relatively unknown people?
Mappaindy is offline


Old 11-18-2008, 12:20 AM   #6
WrigleyMike

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
398
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Darius871
No, relatively unknown gay people. That doesn't make a difference, since the question is self-answering.
WrigleyMike is offline


Old 11-18-2008, 12:34 AM   #7
Aztegjpl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
560
Senior Member
Default
Hey Boris, did you go to any local demonstration on Saturday to protest California's Prop. 8?
Aztegjpl is offline


Old 11-18-2008, 01:42 AM   #8
bubbachew14

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
400
Senior Member
Default
It's a proposition about who can proposition whom.
bubbachew14 is offline


Old 11-18-2008, 01:49 AM   #9
loyalgagora

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
472
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by MrFun
Hey Boris, did you go to any local demonstration on Saturday to protest California's Prop. 8? No.

1. I've never been to a protest, nor will I, probably. I think they are a pretty archaic and ineffectual method of changing people's minds in the internet age.

2. I don't live in California, so why should I be protesting something that doesn't affect my state one way or the other?

3. I don't think the ban will last long, anyway. It will either be struck down or back on the ballot next election.
loyalgagora is offline


Old 11-18-2008, 01:55 AM   #10
carletoxtrs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
436
Senior Member
Default
Can't you just answer the question? What is proposition 8?
carletoxtrs is offline


Old 11-18-2008, 01:58 AM   #11
Kolovorotkes

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Nikolai
Can't you just answer the question? What is proposition 8? It was a California ballot measure that requires obscure gay men to marry ugly lesbian celebrities.

MrFun's wedding to Rosie O'Donnell is scheduled this Saturday.
Kolovorotkes is offline


Old 11-18-2008, 02:01 AM   #12
mikefertynnz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
418
Senior Member
Default
Okay Boris, I marry Rosie and you marry Sarah Palin.


Anyway, in all seriousness - Proposition 8 passed in California by vote which now prohibits gay and lesbian couples from legally marrying in that state.

Sadly, this will invalidate the 18,000 gay and lesbians couples who had already legally married when the Supreme Court had ruled earlier to permit equal marriage rights.
mikefertynnz is offline


Old 11-18-2008, 02:02 AM   #13
Phywhewashect

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
537
Senior Member
Default
I see. Thanks MrFun.
Phywhewashect is offline


Old 11-18-2008, 02:08 AM   #14
mincarlie.frymyer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
369
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Boris Godunov

This is not certain. One of the problems with the measure was its lack of guidance on those marriages. That's one of the reasons the legal challenges to Prop 8 seem to have some merit. I don't know how the California supreme court could invalidate those marriages, since at the time they were performed, they had been considered an "essential right" by that very court. I know - I've seen this point before in news articles and here on Apolyton. I just really, really hope we prove to be right in this regard.
mincarlie.frymyer is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:11 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity