LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-03-2008, 11:40 PM   #1
poekfpojoibien

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default New Carriers for the RN!
Just what the world needs
poekfpojoibien is offline


Old 07-03-2008, 11:52 PM   #2
Aozenee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
now all the need to do is replace the F-35 with something less crappy and they are set to go.
Aozenee is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 12:01 AM   #3
F1grandprix

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
418
Senior Member
Default
Just out of interest, could a 747 or Airbus land on one of these safely, say in an emergency - meaning shortage of fuel.?
F1grandprix is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 12:13 AM   #4
jurnalkduo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
390
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Kidicious


No Is that because of the length of runway or capacity of the arresting chains to stop such a beast. Or other?
jurnalkduo is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 12:18 AM   #5
offinoNem

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Hercules


Is that because of the length of runway or capacity of the arresting chains to stop such a beast. Or other? The arresting chains probably have the capacity. The problem is the capability of the pilots. You have to be trained to land on a ship. Even if you are trained you probably couldn't land a 747 or airbus.
offinoNem is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 12:24 AM   #6
O25YtQnn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
552
Senior Member
Default
Ok I understand.

I feel a Steven Segal movie coming on.

So if the pilot crew found themselves in such a situation, near an aircraft carrier, their best option is to ditch and hope/await rescue.?
O25YtQnn is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 12:31 AM   #7
cucceevevaind

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
652
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Hercules
Ok I understand.

I feel a Steven Segal movie coming on.

So if the pilot crew found themselves in such a situation, near an aircraft carrier, their best option is to ditch and hope/await rescue.? Well, also 747s don't have arresting gear. So yes.
cucceevevaind is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 12:43 AM   #8
SaamanthaSterlyng

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
362
Senior Member
Default
Not really, since a new Nimitz with maybe three times the capability costs only 4.5 billion dollars.

We have the experiance and economy of scale though, so I am sure that has a bit to do with that cost. Good on them though, I do wish they had gone with catapults though.
SaamanthaSterlyng is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 12:50 AM   #9
dgdhgjjgj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
481
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Patroklos
Not really, since a new Nimitz with maybe three times the capability costs only 4.5 billion dollars. How much will the USS Ford cost?
dgdhgjjgj is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 01:05 AM   #10
Haibundadam

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
Are there any Presidents not to have been given a ship in their name? (excluding the most recent who will no doubt get their chance)
Haibundadam is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 01:07 AM   #11
lookanddiscover

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
527
Senior Member
Default
As I say, give it time for those. What about the others.
lookanddiscover is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 01:11 AM   #12
Mjyzpzph

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
530
Senior Member
Default
Are there any Presidents not to have been given a ship in their name? (excluding the most recent who will no doubt get their chance) Actauly, some pretty recent ones like Carter, Ford, Reagon, and Bush #1 already have one.

But yes, there are presidents that haven't had ships named after them. I believe presidents only entered our naming conventions recently for the most part, starting with our first SSBNs.

I think Carter is being skipped. Carter got the second Seawolf-class submarine, since he was a submariner
Mjyzpzph is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 01:14 AM   #13
swoluelvede

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
358
Senior Member
Default
The Beatles got one too.
swoluelvede is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 01:39 AM   #14
avodeinst

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
484
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Sandman
Ј3 billion is quite a steal, really. Not that it will stay at that figure when BAE is involved. And the planes are added in. So that's where they got the money to buy out Tenix!
avodeinst is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 01:56 AM   #15
animilius

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
555
Senior Member
Default
So the unimportant people got left out? Figures.
animilius is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 03:05 AM   #16
beatrisio

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
314
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Will


Q. Adams (There is USS Quincy, but named after the town Adams and Q. Adams were born in), Harrison, Tyler, Taylor, Fillmore, Pierce, Buchanan, Johnson, Hayes (there is a USS Hayes, but I don't who it named after), Garfield, Arthur, Cleveland, McKinley, Taft, Harding, Coolidge, & Hoover. I didn't check any after that. We do not have any ships name after Ford
or Nixon.
beatrisio is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 05:01 AM   #17
foonlesse

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
473
Senior Member
Default
One dayt thjey re will be a carrier nam,ed aftyer me :Lb:

But no ta USN one :naughtyL:
foonlesse is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 06:00 AM   #18
liontutuxx

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
314
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Joseph
We do not have any ships name after Ford Not yet, but the next carrier, which is the first of the class, is being named after him.
liontutuxx is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 06:46 AM   #19
gettoblaster

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
634
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Joseph
We do not have any ships name after Ford
or Nixon. You have one current ship named after Ford, and another one entering service in 2015 named after him. Potentially you'll have two ships named after one wanker.
gettoblaster is offline


Old 07-04-2008, 07:40 AM   #20
KirillAristov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Will


You can't have a carrier, or the planes on it, strike unnoticed. Sure you can. Especially as the carrier wing in question will be consisting of stealth(F-35s) aircraft.

You have one current ship named after Ford, and another one entering service in 2015 named after him. Potentially you'll have two ships named after one wanker. The current ship ain't named after President Ford.
KirillAristov is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:49 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity