General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#2 |
|
I used to work for Sprint as a customer service rep at one of their call centers. The main problem with Sprint is that they have two billing systems. The primary one is a mishmash of parts from IBM, SAP, and other venders. It's not very useful. The secondary is somewhat more straightforward; however, it's from 2000, it looks like a dos program, it requires agents to manually add all of the proper codes for a phone plan to work, it requires several codes for each line of service, and the other systems are built on top of this system!
Needless to say it's very very easy to make a mistake which will totally screw up somebody's bill. It's very difficult to detect exactly what caused the screwup in the first place. Also trying to get anything done it feels like you're fighting with the most unintuitive, needlessly complicated piece of software. I couldn't believe that a multibillion dollar company used such a crappy, obviously flawed system. Then there is intense pressure to get off of every call as soon as possible, while simultaneously transitioning to a sales pitch as soon as you could. Agents made commission, so that's why they will try to get you to add all of sprint's products like insurance, text messaging, data plans, new lines of service, etc. Other problems included managers hired from outside of the company that had lessknowledge of the systems than most agents, and stupid policies. I believe that in general Sprint tried to take care of the bottom line first, instead of the customer, and it certainly hurt the bottom line. Also anytime you had to prorate a month's service it was a friggin' nightmare because of the way the system handled it. Properly explaining this to a customer when it was correctly executed was difficult. Trying to do it when something went wrong, well that required a friendly and patient customer. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
Originally posted by korn469
I used to work for Sprint as a customer service rep at one of their call centers. The main problem with Sprint is that they have two billing systems. The primary one is a mishmash of parts from IBM, SAP, and other venders. It's not very useful. The secondary is somewhat more straightforward; however, it's from 2000, it looks like a dos program, it requires agents to manually add all of the proper codes for a phone plan to work, it requires several codes for each line of service, and the other systems are built on top of this system! Needless to say it's very very easy to make a mistake which will totally screw up somebody's bill. It's very difficult to detect exactly what caused the screwup in the first place. Also trying to get anything done it feels like you're fighting with the most unintuitive, needlessly complicated piece of software. I couldn't believe that a multibillion dollar company used such a crappy, obviously flawed system. Then there is intense pressure to get off of every call as soon as possible, while simultaneously transitioning to a sales pitch as soon as you could. Agents made commission, so that's why they will try to get you to add all of sprint's products like insurance, text messaging, data plans, new lines of service, etc. Other problems included managers hired from outside of the company that had lessknowledge of the systems than most agents, and stupid policies. I believe that in general Sprint tried to take care of the bottom line first, instead of the customer, and it certainly hurt the bottom line. Also anytime you had to prorate a month's service it was a friggin' nightmare because of the way the system handled it. Properly explaining this to a customer when it was correctly executed was difficult. Trying to do it when something went wrong, well that required a friendly and patient customer. Long story short, Sprint sucks, from personal experience as an employee. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|