LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-21-2007, 07:16 PM   #1
UBJ3kvP1

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
418
Senior Member
Default Quebecker's = P***ies
50% of people being opposed to the sending of the troops would not be so bad, at least, this would show a sign of debates of discussion in the society.

****, but 70% of pussies, oops... Quebecker's are against it. If only they were developing a good and challenging arguments.

My God, NO, they are emotionally controlling the debates with lies, anti americanism, anti imperialism "propaganda"... (if only taleban was only made of Afghans)

Note that the Harper government is doing a bad job trying to explain the mission.
UBJ3kvP1 is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 07:23 PM   #2
zlopikanikanz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
625
Senior Member
Default
Why the hell would they want to be US boot lickers?
zlopikanikanz is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 07:25 PM   #3
avodeinst

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
484
Senior Member
Default
cronos is fairly prejudice.
avodeinst is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 07:26 PM   #4
Karlmarks

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
504
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by EyesOfNight
A good question. Another good question is why haven't we sent you on the first ship destined for the Chinese utopia? Because some Americans think they believe in freedom.
Karlmarks is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 07:30 PM   #5
Saduyre9de

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by EyesOfNight
I believe in giving people what they want. I think China will welcome you with open arms and you can be with your fellow comrades. I have fellow comrades here, tyvm
Saduyre9de is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 07:32 PM   #6
HaseBeceDeemy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by EyesOfNight
By all means, identify them so we can send them with you. Why don't you go back to the 1920s where you can be with your like kind?
HaseBeceDeemy is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 07:35 PM   #7
happyman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
423
Senior Member
Default
@Kid

Come in Quebec Kid...

oh no, I forgot, Quebecker's are too pussies to even be communist.
happyman is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 07:38 PM   #8
Figelac

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
518
Senior Member
Default
@Kid
The problem of them is they are irresponsible.

1: They have organized a march friday, they will be protesting in front of the family soldiers, of the soldiers.

2: The poll show what I was afraid of Quebecker's, they are ideologically pacifist... They are not caring for reality, reality is too hard for them.

I can understand some reasons to not be in Afhanistan(I have mine); but right now, we are there, it's time to show our support.

In 2009, the mission is going to be reevaluated by the government. In 2009, it will be the times of protesting. But right now, we are there, I really think the "only" solutions is to be there and helping the OTAN mission. Wishing that Afghanistan will be able to get rid of the taleban.

3: They are hippies
Figelac is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 07:50 PM   #9
grosqueneen

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
Your argument against their beleifs set aside for a moment, you are acting like eyesofnight. Just because they believe different than you do doesn't make you better then them.
grosqueneen is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 07:58 PM   #10
SantaGanstag

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
411
Senior Member
Default
Isn't it a hold over from the French era for Quebeckers to be annoying? I figured that was just how they got such generous transfer payments from the rest of the provinces.
SantaGanstag is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 08:16 PM   #11
flanna.kersting

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
422
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by cronos_qc
@Kid
The problem of them is they are irresponsible.

1: They have organized a march friday, they will be protesting in front of the family soldiers, of the soldiers. Tacky.

2: The poll show what I was afraid of Quebecker's, they are ideologically pacifist... They are not caring for reality, reality is too hard for them.

Historically this is true.

I can understand some reasons to not be in Afhanistan(I have mine); but right now, we are there, it's time to show our support.

Why would you show support for a military mission you disagree with? If you are talking about the troops - I would support them all the way home.

In 2009, the mission is going to be reevaluated by the government. In 2009, it will be the times of protesting.

There will be no reevaluation if PM Steve is still in charge. It will be like the last "debate" in parliament - The decision is made to continue regardless of the Commons vote. Bank on it.

But right now, we are there, I really think the "only" solutions is to be there and helping the OTAN mission.

NATO has failed as an alliance. "I'll help so long as I don't have to fight" is not an alliance.

Wishing that Afghanistan will be able to get rid of the taleban.

Once we finish killing off all the Afghanis they will be free of "Taliban". They are one and the same.

3: They are hippies Maybe.
flanna.kersting is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 08:40 PM   #12
iioijjjkkojhbb

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
375
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by DinoDoc
It's that kind of thinking that led to situations like the one in My Lai in the Vietnam War. Tell me - who are they then? Where is Talibanistan?
iioijjjkkojhbb is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 08:48 PM   #13
brilkyPlayday

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
When you start viewing the population at large as being the enemy and thinking that either trying to win their hearts and minds isn't worth the trouble or impossible as you suggest that the whole enterprise becomes a house of cards bound for failiure. I hope the Canadian military has more vision and discipline otherwise they should leave at the first opportunity.
brilkyPlayday is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 08:53 PM   #14
Lunims

Join Date
Nov 2005
Location
CA
Posts
601
Senior Member
Default
I think the results on the ground show this mission is a failure. 6 years on and we can't safely leave our bases Where did you get this ridiculous idea?

If Canada wants help agains the Danes, they better man up!
Lunims is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 08:58 PM   #15
scoundtrack

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
469
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Wezil


You can't be serious? Do you need links? Why don't we ask LotM?
scoundtrack is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 09:00 PM   #16
oemcheapdownload

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
373
Senior Member
Default
You can't be serious? Do you need links? I usually rely on first hand accounts, but if you have some that don't only pertain to the 10% of the country that comprise the borderlands with Pakistan, post away.

Germans On second thought, you probably don't need our help with the Danes. The Germans are well rested and closer.
oemcheapdownload is offline


Old 06-21-2007, 09:25 PM   #17
payloansday

Join Date
Dec 2005
Posts
605
Senior Member
Default
Yeah. Hellholes. Like that Singapore place.
payloansday is offline


Old 06-22-2007, 12:49 AM   #18
ronaldasten

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
629
Senior Member
Default


Spec.
ronaldasten is offline


Old 06-22-2007, 02:12 AM   #19
onlyfun_biziness

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
558
Senior Member
Default
This thread scares me. I think I'm going to withdraw from it. pussies
onlyfun_biziness is offline


Old 06-22-2007, 07:31 AM   #20
aAaBecker

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
509
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by General Ludd
I don't support "our" troops.

**** them. The crazy psychopaths. well said
aAaBecker is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:42 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity