LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-31-2006, 07:56 PM   #21
megatrendsZ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
The June test will detonate 700 tons of heavy ammonium nitrate-fuel oil emulsion -- creating a blast equivalent to 593 tons of TNT Why not just use 593 tons of TNT then?
megatrendsZ is offline


Old 03-31-2006, 08:27 PM   #22
9V42h1eT

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Provost Harrison


Why not just use 593 tons of TNT then? funny, I was thinking the same thing.

I hate to think we think alike.
9V42h1eT is offline


Old 04-01-2006, 02:48 AM   #23
sasquatch999

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
337
Senior Member
Default
No current or projected plane will carry 700 tonnes, but we have conventional explosives that are many times more powerful per lb than ammonium nitrate pfuel mix. They are also many times more expensive, which is why the amonium nitrate fuel mix is being used in the test. The test is not for the pourposes of testing a bomb; convention shaped explosives are pretty cut and dried. It is to test the cratering and seismic shock effects of large convetional exposives, to see how deeply they can crack bunkers.
sasquatch999 is offline


Old 04-01-2006, 03:49 AM   #24
elektikakass

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
397
Senior Member
Default
Sounds the opening scene to a cheesy gay porn flick...
elektikakass is offline


Old 04-01-2006, 07:05 AM   #25
pertikuss

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
383
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Urban Ranger


Maybe this is some sort of air blast or whatever you have it, that this stuff sucks up oxygen when going boom, so it will kill a lot more people than TNT? It's hard to suck up oxygen when buried though...I'd thought of that possibility I presume it must be relative cost...
pertikuss is offline


Old 04-01-2006, 12:25 PM   #26
objennasweene

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
465
Senior Member
Default
Stop spamming!
objennasweene is offline


Old 04-01-2006, 12:27 PM   #27
Cvo1iRT0

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
378
Senior Member
Default
Hehe...
Cvo1iRT0 is offline


Old 04-01-2006, 12:28 PM   #28
altosburg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
601
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
I believe that some of the larger cargo planes can carry up to 100 tons of cargo. We've dropped bombs from the back of cargo planes in the past. I think that dropping that much weight at one time would be very hard on a plane. Russia's Antanov AN-225 (only one current built I believe) carries 250 metric tonnes (275 short tons).
altosburg is offline


Old 04-04-2006, 07:27 AM   #29
Natashasuw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
525
Senior Member
Default
Cool stuff.
Natashasuw is offline


Old 04-04-2006, 08:14 AM   #30
nannysuetle

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default
ahh, I found the thread.

Here's an update.

http://www.klas-tv.com/Global/story.asp?S=5852429

Still not as cool as the above ground nuke tests. I wish I was alive to see those. . Easy to say where I live. They always did the tests when Vegas was upwind of the nuke tests. Poor people in Utah got stuck with the fallout.
nannysuetle is offline


Old 12-27-2006, 12:36 AM   #31
Habalinnyf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Dis
They always did the tests when Vegas was upwind of the nuke tests. Poor people in Utah got stuck with the fallout. hmm hmm hmm hmm
Habalinnyf is offline


Old 12-29-2006, 12:59 AM   #32
Hodstcopter

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by LordShiva
WTF is a "strake?" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strake
Hodstcopter is offline


Old 02-28-2007, 11:08 AM   #33
OnerePeepsy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
474
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Will9
There is no plane we know of that can carry 700 tones, but it was tested in Nevada testing site (where Area 51 is located) so they must have a plane we don't know about. There was no mention in the OP article about this test being of an air-dropped device. The first atomic bomb test and the first hydrogen bomb tests were of bombs set up on platforms.

From the OP, it sounded like they would build a replica of some hardened bunker, then set up a huge pile of conventional explosives next to it, and watch what would happen.
OnerePeepsy is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:21 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity