General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
Eh? Cheney has no more Constitutional power to make decisions than bureaucrats in the Foggy Bottom (unless it pertains to breaking a tie in the Senate). The point that Wilkerson has been making is that bureaucracies are important for things other than giving favors to your political supporters. That a President's shouldn't only listen to a tiny circle of people.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
It's pretty obvious that Bush has delegated a lot of his Constitutionally-authorized power to Cheney. That's the point. You were asking why this can't only be a "bad decision," and nothing more. The point is that the bad decisions partially originate from the fact that Bush doesn't listen to very many people.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
Totally not what I meant.
Look at who our allies in the Iraqi gov't are. The Sadrists control the health ministry (edit: and some police forces), we give money to the Iraqi gov't, they shoot at us. We provide arms to Iraqi police and military, they find their way to the black market and into insurgent hands. The irony to this whole thing is that Iran's chief proxy in Iraq, SCIRI, happens to be exactly whom we support the most... |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
If you can't see how this fits, I can't help you...
I don't see why it should matter if the definition of the Greek root word fits. The definition of the modern English word doesn't... Anyone wish to hazard a guess where the IEDs and these supposed "Iranian" weapons are coming from? Here's a hint: Not Iran. Thank god we have you around to provide the definitive word on these matters from your desk chair. |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
Upwards of 377 tons of ammunition (200,000 rounds of 156mm shells among other munitions) were lifted out does not equal this;
a vast Iraqi weapons depot with tens of thousands of artillery rounds and other explosives remained unguarded 10's of thousands /= 100's of thousands. In either case, it hardly explains how the insurgents were able to move a tonnage found by calculating this; Why don't you calculate the total weight of that, the volume needed to store it, and the number of trucks required to move it, and get back to me This would be where you ask you self "does this pass the common sense rule" before blindly posting it. I do like how you revised your original estimate by at least ten times with the source you think supports your statement, did you realize this at the time? by reports Monday that as much as 377 tons of highly powerful explosives had disappeared from a weapons So where did 377 tons and 200,000 rounds of 156mm rounds come from? Reports? What the hell does that mean anyways? Who reports? Where is this report? The reason journalism sucks so bad these days is obviously no body is demanding quality. Reports, HA. |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
Upwards of 377 tons of ammunition (200,000 rounds of 156mm shells among other munitions) were lifted out Learn to read completely.
I am not arguing that Iraqi insurgents are not primarily armed with ex-Iraqi army muntions. This is actually to be expected. It is simple absurd to suggest the amount of material looted is on the scale D suggets. If you read his sources do they really do anything but suggest what was available to be looted? |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|