LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 10-03-2006, 03:32 PM   #1
Bugamerka

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
400
Senior Member
Default I have seen paradise . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OK.
Bugamerka is offline


Old 10-03-2006, 03:40 PM   #2
serius_06

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
50
Posts
506
Senior Member
Default
serius_06 is offline


Old 10-03-2006, 04:07 PM   #3
SantaClaus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
704
Senior Member
Default
Whatever, doesn't sound like paradise if you're Muslim... sounds like hell. The view is always good from the top, as they say. You only think it's paradise because you refuse to see how you are sheiting on those below.
SantaClaus is offline


Old 10-03-2006, 04:16 PM   #4
velichay

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
431
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Pekka
New York is the success story of the multiculturalist dream. Everywhere else? Not much so. But NYC is special in that sense and it's great.
Montreal is number 1 Pekka.

In 2006, both Traveler's Digest and AskMen.com ranked Montreal as the number one city in the world to live in for its culture, architecture, history and ambience http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreal

Spec.
velichay is offline


Old 10-03-2006, 04:18 PM   #5
TainuibeFaimb

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
486
Senior Member
Default
My friend used to complain that it was people in the ghetto that troubled him for associating with non-Muslims like me , not people outside . I would think that in paradise there wouldn't be ghettos, or people complaining.
TainuibeFaimb is offline


Old 10-03-2006, 04:24 PM   #6
xanaxist

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Japher


I would think that in paradise there wouldn't be ghettos, or people complaining. It is the Muslim obsession with "losing their identity" that leads to them concentrating into self-created ghettoes . Maybe ghettoes isn't the best word . I should ideally say "areas" or "quarters" . As I told you , nobody minds them , but they mind mixing with others .
xanaxist is offline


Old 10-03-2006, 04:33 PM   #7
Inconykic

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
369
Senior Member
Default
Cali? You still alive!

Spec.
Inconykic is offline


Old 10-03-2006, 04:39 PM   #8
hjyAMqqT

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
355
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by aneeshm
There is no caste feeling - for if there was , how could a Brahmin have become so popular as to be the MP? Wouldn't a Brahman be most likely to become MP?
Now if a "lower caste" member could become MP, you might have a point...
hjyAMqqT is offline


Old 10-03-2006, 04:55 PM   #9
arrasleds

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
407
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Maniac


Wouldn't a Brahman be most likely to become MP?
Now if a "lower caste" member could become MP, you might have a point... You've got it backwards , haven't you ? Maybe you need to take more of an interest in Indian politics . If there was caste feeling , backward castes would have voted for one of their own , and no Brahmin would have stood a chance . This is already the case in a very large part of India . The voters of Indore do not look at these things , and are relatively unaffected by them , and that is why the current MP retains power .

Backward caste MPs are the norm instead of the exception in modern India . Did you not know that ?
arrasleds is offline


Old 10-03-2006, 06:46 PM   #10
JonDopl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
You've been to the Playboy Mansion!!


Spec.
JonDopl is offline


Old 10-03-2006, 09:44 PM   #11
HBPujWBe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by aneeshm
You've got it backwards , haven't you ? Maybe you need to take more of an interest in Indian politics . If there was caste feeling , backward castes would have voted for one of their own , and no Brahmin would have stood a chance . This is already the case in a very large part of India . The voters of Indore do not look at these things , and are relatively unaffected by them , and that is why the current MP retains power . I assumed high castes would be unlikely to vote on lower castes, while the opposite would be less true.

Backward caste MPs are the norm instead of the exception in modern India . Did you not know that ? Nope. Do the MPs usually follow higher education, or are they truly the same as their voters? Eg poor uneducated votes on poor uneducated.

Here there are hardly lower class people in parliament, so you could generally say lower class votes on middle class.
HBPujWBe is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:02 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity