General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe
This one too. Seems the GOP was by and large behind him and in fact at times urging harder line responses. So why the crocodile tears saying the right wingers were hypocritical and unsupportive of these actions. If anything they were saying more needed to be done. Paranoid visions of a vast Right wing conspiracy. |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
Originally posted by SlowwHand
I never would have thought I'd hear Clinton and counter-terrorism in the positive mentioned. I voted for him twice, and all I'll remember him for is NAFTA and Monica. Neither of which I'd use as highlights on my resume, if I was him. why'd you vote for him the second time then? ![]() I didn't vote for him at all. |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
Originally posted by SlowwHand
North testified as far back as the Iran-Contra hearings about Bin Laden. Er, why does the quote you gave give no evidence for what you're saying? And it's not anywhere on the wikipedia page for North or Iran-Contra, or in your quote. And back then, bin Laden's main focus was the Afghans resisting the Soviet occupation... |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|