[bug_user]

Originally posted by Sprayber
Although I do draw the line at simply quoting someone without so much as a or Why? Can't a man simply use a quote about a topic to express himself without the spam patrol crashing down on him like a ton of bricks?

The line can be hard to draw at times. Though of course, the ultimate answer to the issue is that this is not a democracy, so the line is drawn as the oligarchy pleases.

[P1international]

This should be an interesting answer.... very much so

In response to the OP I would like to begin by offering this definition:

Spam, n. 1) delicious goodness contained within a jelly goodness, generally served with eggs 2) Unwarrented drivle which fills the bowels of cyberspace on any number of the internets without any heed to rhyme, reason, or the point of the topic which being discussed.

With that said, here is a pic of Josie.

[DoctorDulitlBest]

Originally posted by Ecthy

[b3JOkwXL]

I see it was moved.

[bppstorr]

Originally posted by Dis
I guess they didn't deem it serious enough. Apparently, the OP's question was the answer he was looking for.

[toopyimport]

.

[vaalmerruutel]

Yeah... spam is totally subjective and a matter of opinion. I look at it from an "intent" perspective. And while any assumption on intent is just that, a guess at best, I still think it's the best way to judge spam.

And, since this is a thread about spam...

[Petrushkaukrop]

Do you guys like bunnies?

I think the're small.

Spec.

[Saduyre9de]

Damn that spamburger looks yummy.