General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
I ran out of weed at the beginning of july
so no smoking for almost 2 months next harvest in maybe 6 weeks i see your argument is so weak you have to try to insult my life ![]() evidence is thin? 6 confirmed tests prove he used EPO in 1999 But Jean-Marie Leblanc, the director of the Tour de France, called the paper's report "very complete, very professional, very meticulous." He said on RTL radio that the charge "appears credible." from the NYtimes article... referring to the French newspaper's report and what is hypocritical about my condemnations? how do I not know a thing about cycling? it's riding a bike... oh wait, let me try the Boris arguing style: "You're just a dumb fag, what do you know?" |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
The laboratory which did the testing did not link the samples to Armstrong. The samples were provided to them without any identification. L'Equipe - the newspaper with the story - says that they did a 4 month inquiry and were able to link the samples to the runner.
L'Equipe explique cependant avoir mené quatre mois d'enquête sur les 12 échantillons révélés positifs à l'EPO par ces analyses, et avoir pu déterminer ainsi que six d'entre eux appartenaient au coureur américain. Détaillant sa méthode, le journal dit avoir comparé les numéros des échantillons urinaires prélevés sur l'Américain, consignés sur les procès-verbaux nominatifs des contrôles antidopage remplis par le médecin ayant effectué les prélèvements lors du Tour 1999, et les numéros des échantillons qualifiés de positifs à l'EPO par le laboratoire de Châtenay-Malabry. D'après le journal, six correspondent. L”Equipe explains that after a 4 month inquiry on the 12 samples that did test positive for EPO, they were able to determine that 6 of them belonged to the American. Detailing its method, the newspaper said that they compared the numbers of the urine samples taken from the American, from the anti-doping control documents filled by the doctors responsible for sampling during the 1999 Tour, and the numbers of the samples that tested positive for EPO according to the Châtenay-Malabry laboratory. According to L’Equipe, six of these numbers are a match. (translation is mine) |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
I'm not surprised... Lance Armstrong is an *******... he's a cheating doper...
he's not an athlete riding a bike is not a sport it should be legal to run over people who ride bikes on streets he's a bigger cheater than the east-german women olympic team and he left his wife (who stood by him during cancer) for rock and roll hosebag sheryl crow i'm not surprised morons like him |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
Another take on why the testing was done in the first place
L'Équipe said they (the lab) had been refining their detection methods. One prominent antidoping expert, however, suggests the analysts were deliberately seeking to target Armstrong. "Scientists have had their doubts about Armstrong for a long time," says Jean-Pierre de Mondenard, a sports doctor in Paris who once worked for the Tour, detecting riders' drug use. "They were fed up with being fooled. Armstrong's seven victories were a defeat for the battle against doping." |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
Originally posted by Sava
I ran out of weed at the beginning of july so no smoking for almost 2 months next harvest in maybe 6 weeks i see your argument is so weak you have to try to insult my life ![]() ![]() And you've been insulting people's lives all along (unfounded accusations against Armstrong's personal life, insulting cyclists, etc.), so why shouldn't you get the same? evidence is thin? 6 confirmed tests prove he used EPO in 1999 I already posted why this evidence was dubious in that post you conveniently ignored. On top of that: http://in.today.reuters.com/news/new...a-213611-1.xml A French specialist doping laboratory said on Tuesday it could not confirm that tests it had conducted for the blood-boosting drug EPO belonged to Lance Armstrong. Gee, they can't confirm the samples are even his--THIS is your wonderful evidence? from the NYtimes article... referring to the French newspaper's report And Marchand is a doctor? A chemist? Oh, no, he's a race bureaucrat... and what is hypocritical about my condemnations? Hmmm, could be your insulting people's chosen activities/hobbies while your own are hardly worthy of much respect. I'm willing to bet those fat cyclists are still more productive members of society. Hell, who wouldn't be? how do I not know a thing about cycling? it's riding a bike... You just prove my point more. Ok, we'll get you on a road bike and see how you do. First, I'll try not to laugh every time you fall over. Then I'll try not to smoke you too badly when you're dying on a hill because you haven't a clue about gear shifting on it. oh wait, let me try the Boris arguing style: "You're just a dumb fag, what do you know?" ![]() Except I didn't engage in any such ad hominem. You were first insulting other people's life choices, so it was only proper to point out how you might want to remove the plank from your own eye first. |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
Except I didn't engage in any such ad hominem. You were first insulting other people's life choices, so it was only proper to point out how you might want to remove the plank from your own eye first. the first post after my first post is yours... calling me a twit..
so go **** yourself edit: better yet, go get aids and die |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
|