LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 04-01-2007, 11:46 AM   #1
Vulkanevsel

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
286
Senior Member
Default Argies looking to take Falklands...
For the uninitiated, why do either country - much less the UK at 8,000 miles away - give two sh*ts about these islands?
Vulkanevsel is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 11:55 AM   #2
oraltyrap

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
360
Senior Member
Default
Maybe because of what might be under the water within the territorial limits of the Falklands.
oraltyrap is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 12:01 PM   #3
freevideoandoicsI

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
600
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by CerberusIV
Maybe because of what might be under the water within the territorial limits of the Falklands. Aquatic sheep, perhaps?
freevideoandoicsI is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 12:21 PM   #4
echocassidyde

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
407
Senior Member
Default
Because sheep-rearing is not enough of a growth industry to justify giving one sh*t, let alone two, over these islands 8,000 miles away.
echocassidyde is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 12:41 PM   #5
RokgroofeTeme

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
382
Senior Member
Default
Let me guess, it's election year?
RokgroofeTeme is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 01:03 PM   #6
kranfid

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
531
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by KrazyHorse
through diplomacy?

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americ....ap/index.html

What a load of trash. The two most bloody-minded peoples in history have been the Romans and the British.

If the Limeys have fallen so far that they'll be willing to sit down with a bunch of South American pinko scum about giving up territory that British soldiers have died for in living memory then I'll become a damn nihilist. If I can't believe in British stubbornness then I might as well stop believing in anything at all. It's easy to discuss things, and politics to do so. Britain won't give up anything however.
kranfid is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 01:21 PM   #7
Keyblctt

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
427
Senior Member
Default
Well, there's that rock between Canadiastan-proper and Greenland that likewise no one else in the world gives two sh*ts about.
Keyblctt is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 01:24 PM   #8
Onervemurce

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
326
Senior Member
Default
Of course, that rock doesn't even have sheep.
Onervemurce is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 02:19 PM   #9
kneexyFreedly

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
372
Senior Member
Default
Argentina

If the article is to be believed, the islanders don't wish to be part of Argentina. That in and of itself is enough to reject the Argentine claim.
kneexyFreedly is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 02:53 PM   #10
Anaedilla

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
735
Senior Member
Default
I thought I was clear in my meaning; I guess not. I meant that besides oil (which didn't pan out) and sheep, what makes the islands economically worth the bother to the UK or Argentina? Asked, answered.
Anaedilla is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 03:17 PM   #11
lakraboob

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
451
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by DRoseDARs
For the uninitiated, why do either country - much less the UK at 8,000 miles away - give two sh*ts about these islands? The Brits care about it because virtually everyone on the island is British and they want to remain part of the UK. The Argentines care for no good reason and in fact are just taught in school that it is part of Argentina. The reality is a Spanish ship stopping in the 1700's and then not coming back doesn't make much of a claim on the islands when another country actually colonized it.
lakraboob is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 04:25 PM   #12
Mjyzpzph

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
530
Senior Member
Default
I just saw the date on this. It must be an April fool's joke.
Mjyzpzph is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 05:03 PM   #13
AriaDesser

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Oerdin


The Brits care about it because virtually everyone on the island is British and they want to remain part of the UK. The Argentines care for no good reason and in fact are just taught in school that it is part of Argentina. The reality is a Spanish ship stopping in the 1700's and then not coming back doesn't make much of a claim on the islands when another country actually colonized it. The issue is the english acknowledged the islands belonged to Spain in treaties, and after Argentina became independent, the argentines did colonize the islands, the (argentine) population of the islands was expelled when the english occupied it in 1833, which was pretty much an Act of piracy.

Argies have claimed those islands every year since 1833.

So it is not as if they have a worse claim than the english, there is a reason why the excuse for keeping the islands is the people who live nowadays want to remain english, while ignoring what happened in the XIX century.

Sincerely, I think that altough england may have gotten the islands in a wrong way, they should remain english, since the people there want to remain english, their ancestros have lived for over a century and a half there and they are not guilty of what happened in the XIX century.

So my solution would be england keeps the islands, but apologizes to Argentina for taking the islands by force in 1833.
But that wont happen, because pigs will fly before the english apologize for their colonialism, and the argentines will continue claiming the islands.

By the way, the falklands are rich because the Argentine sea is very rich in fish, the falklands have claimed a huge territory of sea surrounding it, and they sell licenses to fishing companies from china etc to fish in their waters, the argentines obviously see the falklanders as parasites, only 3 thousand people live in those islands, and the fishing ammounts to over 10% of the fishing argentines (40 million people) do
AriaDesser is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 06:07 PM   #14
qwerty1

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
622
Senior Member
Default
By the way, I forgot to mention, according to the Argentina constitution Argentina can not go to war for the islands again, it would be illegal, they modified their constitutions to make it say they claim the islands, but can only get them thru peaceful means.

I mention that because in english tabloids, always twice or 3 times a year there are articles about, omg argentina is going to invade the islands in any moment!! and articles with navy officers saying they are so under funded that they would lose to Argentina if it invaded the islands again.
qwerty1 is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 07:30 PM   #15
cauddyVab

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
602
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Lazarus and the Gimp
It says something about Britain that we're so determined to cling onto desolate little specks of rock with no obvious value.

The Falklands, South Georgia, Pitcairn, Scotland...
cauddyVab is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 08:11 PM   #16
mikaelluioy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
424
Senior Member
Default
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_War

NEVER FORGET
mikaelluioy is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 08:15 PM   #17
fruttomma

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
$100 for a pig?! In 1850?
fruttomma is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 08:27 PM   #18
Doncarlito

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Dauphin
The alamo? No, we stole Texas fair and square.
Doncarlito is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 09:00 PM   #19
namaikaimvputka

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
359
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Lazarus and the Gimp
It says something about Britain that we're so determined to cling onto desolate little specks of rock with no obvious value.

The Falklands, South Georgia, Pitcairn, Scotland...

But Scotland gave the world Clan Rose of Kilravock...
namaikaimvputka is offline


Old 04-01-2007, 09:47 PM   #20
Amorsesombabs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
599
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Barnabas

So it is not as if they have a worse claim than the english, You are wrong. The British have a much better claim on the islands due to 1) everyone on the islands (the people who should determine the fate of the islands) want the islands to remain British 2) Possession is 9/10ths of the law and the British have had the islands for 174 years.

Get over it.
Amorsesombabs is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:03 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity