General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#1 |
|
well i just found this very intresting vids on the 9/11 pentagon strike
the video shown how the Pentagon strike hitted by a missle not a Boeing 757 well enough siad i'll let the video speak for it self http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
you thought that was interesting? Watch part 2, its longer and talks about more. An hour long since it's basically a movie, but it's incredibly convinceing and interesting. Yeah, After seeing them I just don't know what to believe.
Loose Change 2nd Edition http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...81991288263801 The was a discussion about this here a couple days ago http://gamingring.com/forum/showthread.php?t=43250 |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
I find it entertaining that a domain based in the UK has all this information that not even the public knows here in the states.
People believe what they want to hear, and what they want to hear is the government is at fault. It's simply an excuse. So they wonder where the remains of a boeing plane are, but not a missile? A missile would need a hell of a structure to pierce 3 walls and still have remains, but they didn't see any of those.. did they? |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
I find it entertaining that a domain based in the UK has all this information that not even the public knows here in the states. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
Seen it before, BS. The "quotes" from people are easily made up, questions can be answered simply. For example, did people see a tail of an aicraft hang out of the world trade centers? No, its called an explosion. Explosions dont leave behind fuselages.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12818225/ Theres the video. You can clearly see the aircraft in the distance, clearly make out the shape of the fuselage and the tail. Stop on the second frame and take a look. Yes its small, but its from a distance. Everything makes perfect sense. Edit: oh and these are the very videos the video in this post claimed the FBI was holding in. They were being used for a criminial investigation for zacarius moussaoi and are now officially released. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
or you are ignoring it on purpose. CH, those frames don't prove anything because you can't see anything. Plus in the frame you see it looking like it hit the ground first, but in the photographs of the scene that area was perfectly normal. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Kinda hard to take a clear photo of something moving over 500 mph if you ask me. BLASPHEMY! |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
The best part of the original video is when they zoomed in and looked at a picture from one of the camera. Then placed a very clear picture of a 757 beside it, and put question marks everywhere. You mean to tell me you are comparing one of the most distorted images Ive ever seen to a clear picture of a 757, and saying you can tell that the distorted image isnt a plane? Gimme a break.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
damn that vid is very convincing...i'll have to watch the otherone later if its an hour i dont have time right now...almost time for work...there's this guy on a radio show i listen to
(Rover's Morning Glory, in Cleveland,Cinci,Columbus,Detroit,StLouis,Chicago) named Dieter he's really into all this conspiracy stuff so i'm gonna send it to him...typically all this conspiracy shit is beyond me but this one's got me interested |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
damn that vid is very convincing...i'll have to watch the otherone later if its an hour i dont have time right now...almost time for work...there's this guy on a radio show i listen to ![]() |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|