General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Hmmm. I can see being skeptical about most all forms of evidence in criminal law.
I'm not sure we cannot rely on a witness who sees someone holding an object, then hears a loud bang, and then sees someone fall down. Of course, there could be conditions where the person viewing this would be a good witness and others where the person would be a bad witness. We should be able to take these things into account. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Are you familiar with the McGurk effect? The brain does not accurately interpret input. We hallucinate the world via what input our senses provide us. People that experience subjective realities substantially different from what a substantive group would report as real seemingly have different biological mechanisms that either interrupt input, distort input, or neurological pathways that assemble input in such a way that provide a much different result than the so called norm. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|