General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Congress Sure Does.
Internet providers would be forced to keep logs of their customers' activities for one year--in case police want to review them in the future--under legislation that a U.S. House of Representatives committee approved today. http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20...snooping-bill/ |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
Its not the my privacy I am concerned about, it is about what can be done to all the knowledge about me.
We see hacks occur all around us, I don''t want to have my data be open on the street. I do not like to hand over my DNA , unless I am a serious suspect of crime, so I can prove my innocense. Same goes for my financial life and lifestyle. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Yeah I will. You mean the PROTECT IP act? http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20062419-38.html Or perhaps the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act? http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/i...shed-congress/ Or maybe these moves to reduce privacy and institute internet surveillance? http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02..._dot_0_policy/ http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/200...ng-overturned/ And that was just the stuff I could remember clearly... imagine if I did so much as a google search. Obama's got you searching for Republican evilness (as the Rush Limbaugh crowd is prompted to do the same) while the same exact people actually run the ball, with the same exact ideas. It's lame, and you bought into it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
Right. ![]() |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|