[gariharlj]

No person should have to go through what that little girl was forced to go through I hope that sick pervert burns in hell and has is privates feed to wild animal while he is still breathing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zHZZZEIe_0

What sort of low life C**t would do this

http://wapedia.mobi/en/Sara_Payne

Some people are so F**king sick[cursing]

This was posted by Shia17

[LarryRda]

No person should have to go through what that little girl was forced to go through I hope that sick pervert burns in hell and has is privates feed to wild animal while he is still breathing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zHZZZEIe_0

What sort of low life C**t would do this

http://wapedia.mobi/en/Sara_Payne

Some people are so F**king sick[cursing]

This was posted by Shia17

while it is terrible, i am not sure it's need to be posted. You could find too many of these type stories in mere minutes. I share you outrage, but do not understand your need to post it.

[WeissVine]

while it is terrible, i am not sure it's need to be posted. You could find too many of these type stories in mere minutes. I share you outrage, but do not understand your need to post it.

Yeah I'm not really sure the relevance of this particular story, it was 9 or 10 years ago.

[BenBoobmers]

while it is terrible, i am not sure it's need to be posted. You could find too many of these type stories in mere minutes. I share you outrage, but do not understand your need to post it.

Yeah I realized that after going on youtube....And as for the case being 10 years old...thanks for the tip...had it sent to me and thought it was sad...think from now on though I will keep what I find interesting to myself

[LarryRda]

Yeah I realized that after going on youtube....And as for the case being 10 years old...thanks for the tip...had it sent to me and thought it was sad...think from now on though I will keep what I find interesting to myself

LOL, yep, no doubt you would take it the wrong way. But since you did decide to get offended for no real reason instead of using the critisism to maybe better tailor your posts toward those who read a male geek forum i will say "At least there is 1 bright side...if you stick to your guns and decide to keep what you find interesting to yourself, the gd forum won't look like the inside of teen magazine anymore" [rofl]

[leareliovag]

LOL, yep, no doubt you would take it the wrong way. But since you did decide to get offended for no real reason instead of using the critisism to maybe better tailor your posts toward those who read a male geek forum i will say "At least there is 1 bright side...if you stick to your guns and decide to keep what you find interesting to yourself, the gd forum won't look like the inside of teen magazine anymore" [rofl]

Bravo!!!! [rofl] You tell that damn girl bro brah

[BenBoobmers]

I didn't say that as a reply to your comment I said it in response to something I was told....I am a chick so some of the stuff I find interesting you guys don't all I meant was I was going to rethink posting stuff about celebs and other sh*t..LOL [rofl]

I mean what bloke wants to know about Madonna and the photo shopping that she needs....LOL ...what then again Snw commented alot on that one LOL

[JoZertekAdv]

In the youtube description it says, " If Sarah's parents had known that Whiting was in the area then Sara said this would not have happened."

So if Sarah's parents knew this pedophile was in the area...it wouldn't have happened because their dead daughter would tell them?

That doesn't make any sense. Also, there is no way to know that this wouldn't have happened even if you DID know that he was a pedophile.

[BenBoobmers]

In the youtube description it says, " If Sarah's parents had known that Whiting was in the area then Sara said this would not have happened."

So if Sarah's parents knew this pedophile was in the area...it wouldn't have happened because their dead daughter would tell them?

That doesn't make any sense. Also, there is no way to know that this wouldn't have happened even if you DID know that he was a pedophile.

No the youtube video was to support Sarah's Law...


The LEGAL RIGHT of every parent to know the identity of serious child sex offenders living in their community.
However, with severe penalties in place for anybody who misuses this information.


http://www.forsarah.com/html/sarahslaw.html


It has both its up and its downs....but Sarah's parents were saying that if this law had been in place when Sarah was alive they would not have left there children by themselves in the area..because Sarah's law or another version of it would have informed them that there was a child sex offender living in the area...

[JoZertekAdv]

No the youtube video was to support Sarah's Law...


The LEGAL RIGHT of every parent to know the identity of serious child sex offenders living in their community.
However, with severe penalties in place for anybody who misuses this information.


http://www.forsarah.com/html/sarahslaw.html


It has both its up and its downs....but Sarah's parents were saying that if this law had been in place when Sarah was alive they would not have left there children by themselves in the area..because Sarah's law or another version of it would have informed them that there was a child sex offender living in the area...

I know what the video was to support but the description doesn't make sense.

[abouthotels]

while it is terrible, i am not sure it's need to be posted. You could find too many of these type stories in mere minutes. I share you outrage, but do not understand your need to post it.

This is what I thought I mean we could all type hundreds of [cursing] and some curses this will continue to happen. While reading such things to know it can happen is though very important..

[nithhysfusy]

In Texas, we would have killed that pedo****er!
________
Outdoor Xxx

[CindyLavender]

It has both its up and its downs....but Sarah's parents were saying that if this law had been in place when Sarah was alive they would not have left there children by themselves in the area..because Sarah's law or another version of it would have informed them that there was a child sex offender living in the area...

It takes sex offenders hanging around for parents to watch their kids? What happened to the days where kids played while the parents sat around watching them and talking amongst themselves?

So let's pretend the law was in effect, and they were in a "safe" area, so they just let their kids play without watching them. Up zooms the free candy van, and off go the children. Because as we all know pedophiles can't kidnap in areas away from their home.

All these laws are retarded. The proper solution is to not leave your children unsupervised.

[WeissVine]

It takes sex offenders hanging around for parents to watch their kids? What happened to the days where kids played while the parents sat around watching them and talking amongst themselves?

It seems kind of ironic that you talk about the (good ole?) days when parents sat around watching kids play when it would be better to ask, what happened to the days when you could actually be a child? There was this research done about how far a 9 year old child would be allowed to roam. Back in the 70s it was over a mile radius by the 90s it had dropped down to about 200 yards and today freedom extends about a far as the end of the yard. Personally I find that really depressing clearly you don't.

You see there used to be a time when we didn't let media sensationalism rule our lives. Times when we might have thought rationally about things like 93% of child abuse occurring amongst people we know (most often family) or the fact in a given year the odds of a kid being kidnapped are about 1 in a million and concluded that actually the risk is so minute that yes we can let our kids go out on there own.

I remember these times, I remember being given something called freedom and responsibility. Around the age of 6 I could visit friends on nearby streets and had about 250 yards either way that I could explore. By 10 this was miles and if I wanted to take a train to another town with a friend or even cycle to another town by myself I was welcome to. You told your parents where you were going and when you'd be back and it was your side of the bargain to live up to your word. Nowadays we have become indoctrinated by the media to think differently we are unable to assess real risk anymore.

There's something to be said for those summers roaming around exploring with friends. These days we have allowed the media's OTT reporting of these incidents ruin our offsprings childhoods and rule our own lives. There was a time when if you saw some little kid crying for it's mommy you'd run over and ask the kid if he was okay, then try and help him find his parents. These days you hesitate, you think I'd like to help out but I don't want someone thinking I'm a pedo. So you wait and you hope. Hope that some female will come along and take care of the situation instead.

[JoZertekAdv]

http://www.theonion.com/content/vide...es_tips_on_how

[Immampdah]

It seems kind of ironic that you talk about the (good ole?) days when parents sat around watching kids play when it would be better to ask, what happened to the days when you could actually be a child? There was this research done about how far a 9 year old child would be allowed to roam. Back in the 70s it was over a mile radius by the 90s it had dropped down to about 200 yards and today freedom extends about a far as the end of the yard. Personally I find that really depressing clearly you don't.

You see there used to be a time when we didn't let media sensationalism rule our lives. Times when we might have thought rationally about things like 93% of child abuse occurring amongst people we know (most often family) or the fact in a given year the odds of a kid being kidnapped are about 1 in a million and concluded that actually the risk is so minute that yes we can let our kids go out on there own.

I remember these times, I remember being given something called freedom and responsibility. Around the age of 6 I could visit friends on nearby streets and had about 250 yards either way that I could explore. By 10 this was miles and if I wanted to take a train to another town with a friend or even cycle to another town by myself I was welcome to. You told your parents where you were going and when you'd be back and it was your side of the bargain to live up to your word. Nowadays we have become indoctrinated by the media to think differently we are unable to assess real risk anymore.

There's something to be said for those summers roaming around exploring with friends. These days we have allowed the media's OTT reporting of these incidents ruin our offsprings childhoods and rule our own lives. There was a time when if you saw some little kid crying for it's mommy you'd run over and ask the kid if he was okay, then try and help him find his parents. These days you hesitate, you think I'd like to help out but I don't want someone thinking I'm a pedo. So you wait and you hope. Hope that some female will come along and take care of the situation instead.

I agree 100% . I know when I was a kid I used to go off with mates and play in the street or in the local park without an adult's supervision all the time.

I also used to walk to (primary) school by myself. How many kids do that these days? Most of them are probably ferried to school by car all the time.

[Andrius]

this is still very sad even now, i live in the town where roy whiting lived when this happened, actually 200 yards from his place.
even now the whole town is haunted by what happened.
sarah was abducted a few miles away, and remember everytime i went out for a walk or anything like that, checking all bushes or alleys, anywhere a body could be found and thinking please dont let me find her.
im all for sara's law, if we had known he lived there i would like to say we woulda kept a closer eye out, but actually think we would have castrated the sick ****, which would have been very satisfying.

[Immampdah]

but actually think we would have castrated the sick ****, which would have been very satisfying.

And that's exactly why they won't implement such a law. People taking the law into their own hands and idiots who don't know the difference between a paedophile and paediatrician.

[CindyLavender]

And that's exactly why they won't implement such a law. People taking the law into their own hands and idiots who don't know the difference between a paedophile and paediatrician.

Also, pedo and molester aren't the same thing either. I don't really have a beef with pedo's until they become molesters. Sure, they're messed up, but as long as they refrain from harming any children I'm not going to hate them because there's something wrong with them in the head. It's not like they chose to be sick in the head. Just keep away from the kids and we'll be fine.

I remember these times, I remember being given something called freedom and responsibility. Around the age of 6 I could visit friends on nearby streets and had about 250 yards either way that I could explore. By 10 this was miles and if I wanted to take a train to another town with a friend or even cycle to another town by myself I was welcome to. You told your parents where you were going and when you'd be back and it was your side of the bargain to live up to your word. Nowadays we have become indoctrinated by the media to think differently we are unable to assess real risk anymore.

How much of that travelling and time away from your parents was spent with aboslutely NO adults present?

Also, parents need to teach their children about strangers. I was no fool as a kid. If some weird dude came up to me I'd ignore him and if he made a grab I'd have kicked him in the nuts. You hear about pedo's all the time seducing your kids on-line, and all I can think is how retarded someone is to go meet a total stranger you met on the internets. It seems technology has made people retarded.

[Andrius]

this guy had a history of this, dont know if you realise this.
how would you feel if this guy moved in next door to you and you had kids?
think you would be ok with that? everyone deserves a second chance?
he has done this a few times before, how many second chances do you get?

if you want to judge someone for taking something like that into their own hands then fair enough, but the thought that you could have stopped something like that happening, then **** it send me down.

the whole idea of sarahs law is that everyone on the registar is a paedophile, not an innocent person that has been wrongly identified.
if it makes them live in fear then so be it, its the least they deserve.