![]() |
Roush vs. Saleen
For a Mustang GT V8, which supercharger would offer better performance, more responsive and has more potential.
Saleen that produces 400hp / 420lb.ft torque (100/100 increase over stock) @ 4-5 psi Roush that produces 415hp / 385lb.ft torque (115/65 increase over stock) @ 5 psi The Saleen is also like $500 cheaper and has the throttle in front of the engine, where as the Roush has the throttle in the back of the engine bay, so the intake has to wrap around. Just looking at it, I thought that the torque numbers where closer. Not really sure why I am going to be posting this now. Roush has 15hp more, but has 35lb.ft torque less. For some reason I thought that it was like 20 or something. Oh well, going to post anyways since I am already done. |
what year you looking at
|
gotta be all about the torque surely. thats something you would notice, 15 hp you wouldnt.
by the way. damn those v8 mustangs, spanked my 328ci bmw the other day. not that i thought i could beat him, just thought it would be fun :) |
Quote:
unless its the new roush one with fully independant suspension and not the live rear suspension the normal ones have inc the shelby |
Quote:
Yeah, Top Gear tested the GT500 vs. the Roush Mustang. Roush has like 80/80 less power and went around the track 2 seconds faster then the GT. |
Quote:
I say Saleen, has a better reputation with mustangs than Roush does. |
the saleen, if its the same as the shelby, looked aweful on the top gear track. the extra power made no difference and the suspension made it handle like crap. it looked a mess.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2