LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 12-01-2006, 08:00 PM   #1
Druspills

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
353
Senior Member
Default The Barbarism of the Buddha
Ate to excess.
Druspills is offline


Old 12-01-2006, 08:05 PM   #2
NKUDirectory

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
597
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by SlowwHand
Ate to excess. Actually, only Chinese and Japanese Buddhas are chubby.
NKUDirectory is offline


Old 12-01-2006, 08:07 PM   #3
Blahhhshsh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
Buddha
Buddhism :|
Christ
Christianity

The philosophies of buddhism are wonderful, when you strip the excess layers of superstition away.
Blahhhshsh is offline


Old 12-01-2006, 08:08 PM   #4
girlsround

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
510
Senior Member
Default
I think the main issue is that we don't exactly get a full listing of everything christ/buddha/etc. did ... just the rosy stuff their followers feel like telling us.

It's quite possible that Buddha owned slaves, had four wives, practiced S&M, etc...

(I am not buddhist and do not know if it is possible to directly disprove the above. It's just an example.)

Also, ask Karl Marx what he thinks of Buddha ... he'd probably say he was horrible for being an agent of class oppression and collaborating with the upper class oppressors...
girlsround is offline


Old 12-01-2006, 08:13 PM   #5
slowlexrese

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
AFAIK, the Indian sculptures of the Buddha show him to be of typical ideal Kshatriya build - not lean, nor heavy, but with immense strength. Even when he is meditating, it seems he has the power to shake the world.

Here is a nice picture:

slowlexrese is offline


Old 12-01-2006, 08:14 PM   #6
KellyLynchIV

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
447
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by aneeshm
AFAIK, the Indian sculptures of the Buddha show him to be of typical ideal Kshatriya build - not lean, nor heavy, but with immense strength. That's biologically unlikely. He was probably at least a little overweight as a prince, and substantially underweight as an ascetic and beggar.
KellyLynchIV is offline


Old 12-01-2006, 08:18 PM   #7
Flirigor

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Arrian
the root of human suffering is desire. Unfortunately for Buddhist philosophy, desire is also the root of human achievement.
Flirigor is offline


Old 12-01-2006, 08:22 PM   #8
Srewxardsasv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by aneeshm
In a recent discussion on Mohammed, the point came up that all religious leaders and founders are flawed and were barbaric by modern standards. Of course. And we are barbaric by their standards. The question is whether they were barbaric by the standards of their time.
Srewxardsasv is offline


Old 12-01-2006, 10:51 PM   #9
TimEricsson

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
341
Senior Member
Default
Does anyone here know of anything the Buddha did which could be called barbaric by modern standards? He was Indian
TimEricsson is offline


Old 12-02-2006, 12:11 AM   #10
Mypepraipse

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
Buddism definatly seems (to us Westoners) to be the most Pasifist major religion. Certainly Budda set a strong example but I think another contributing factor would be how the ruling classes treated Buddism. The ruling classes tend to be able to distort a religion to serve their purposes, say for example to justify a war or their own position at the top of society. I dont know much of the History here but from what I gather Hinduism has and always was predominent in India, Buddism spread very far but never became the state religion of a War-like nation that distorted it for self-justification. If thats due to an inherent quality of Buddism its-self (Its cant be assimilated like Species 8472, yes I just compared Buddism to StarTrek ) or if its just an acident of history I cant realy say.
Mypepraipse is offline


Old 12-02-2006, 02:55 AM   #11
FreeOEMcheapestPHOTOSHOP

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Actually, only Chinese and Japanese Buddhas are chubby.

They're not chubby, either. The fat "Buddhas" you see in American Chinese restaurants are actually statues of Hotei (Jp.), the Chinese god of plenty. I saw plenty of heavyset Buddhas while I was in China in Buddhist temples. But there are also plenty of thin ones. They represent different things. You can usually tell its Buddha by the position of the hands. But I don't have a good explanation off the top of my head at this moment.
FreeOEMcheapestPHOTOSHOP is offline


Old 12-02-2006, 03:16 AM   #12
famosetroie

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default
Hotei's not a Buddha, though. Depending on which explanation you adhere to, he was either an arhat or a Chan monk...
famosetroie is offline


Old 12-02-2006, 04:35 AM   #13
Svatudjw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
I don't know about China, but in Japan Hotei and the rest of the Seven Lucky Gods are very different in terms of iconography from buddhas, bodhisattvas and other members of the Buddhist pantheon.
Svatudjw is offline


Old 12-02-2006, 04:23 PM   #14
Redys

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
539
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by SlowwHand
Ate to excess.
Redys is offline


Old 12-02-2006, 06:08 PM   #15
ttiokjbnhjjillp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
436
Senior Member
Default
Go read Buddha's teachings and pay close attention to the references to women. Buddha considered women to be inherently treacherous and subversive to a man's soul. He literally gives them less status than livestock. This 'pacifist' teacher condoned the beating of women.
ttiokjbnhjjillp is offline


Old 12-02-2006, 06:21 PM   #16
CDCL7WKJ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
472
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
Go read Buddha's teachings and pay close attention to the references to women. Buddha considered women to be inherently treacherous and subversive to a man's soul. He literally gives them less status than livestock. This 'pacifist' teacher condoned the beating of women. That's bad. Really bad. I had no idea he did that. This is the Mahayani Buddha or the Hinayani or the Vajrayani Buddha? Because IIRC, women were allowed to be monks in the Buddhist monastic order in later times in India.

What's the reference, BTW?
CDCL7WKJ is offline


Old 12-02-2006, 07:01 PM   #17
PeterPatrickJohn

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
No particular denomination predominates in Japan. If I had to guess, however, I would say that it was probably Jodo Shinshu. They seem to have the most effective proselytizing apparatus, both within Japan and abroad.
PeterPatrickJohn is offline


Old 12-02-2006, 08:09 PM   #18
DF9sLGSU

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddha

In Buddhism, a buddha (Sanskrit बुद्ध) is any being who has become fully awakened (enlightened), has permanently overcome greed, hate, and ignorance, and has achieved complete liberation from suffering.

In short, buddha is boh fat, skinny, muscular, short wahtever.

Siddhartha Gautama, the founder was a prince. He's thought to be handsome and well fit. If u were rich im sure u could afford to look good.

Hotei, the obese, Laughing Buddha, usually seen in China (This figure is believed to be a representation of a medieval Chinese monk who is associated with Maitreya, the future Buddha, and is therefore technically not a Buddha image.)
DF9sLGSU is offline


Old 12-02-2006, 09:00 PM   #19
sueplydup

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
Zen is vastly outnumbered in terms of practioners by schools like Jodo Shinshu and Nichiren. Zen, along with Tendai and Shingon, has generally been the province of the elites in Japan.
sueplydup is offline


Old 12-02-2006, 10:39 PM   #20
Gvadelunar

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
All the old Buddhist (and Hindu) universities (and attached libraries) were pretty much razed to the ground (and burnt) by the Muslim invaders. Islam finished Buddhism in India, because they destroyed the monasteries, which were the fountainheads of Buddhist thought.

The scriptures probably survive, however, somewhere. It is a pity that they have not been systematically catalogued even today, and have not been translated into English.
Gvadelunar is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:41 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity