I tried on a watch today costing £15K - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**dosyrotsbop** · 11-13-2006, 07:33 AM

I've never had a watch in my life.

**IronpumpedLady** · 11-13-2006, 08:49 AM

That's still far more than any watch is worth,who even needs a watch anymore?

I can't believe to miss out the opportunity to use a 100% mechanic device to be different.

**lisualsethelp** · 11-13-2006, 03:42 PM

sissy watch

**machpamb** · 12-11-2006, 07:28 AM

Its was a Graham. Similar to the one below but a lot nicer. Cost £15000. Very nice!!

**SasV7ReJ** · 12-11-2006, 07:38 AM

I'd agree except for that rather large doohicky on the side. What is that, the winder?

**wepoiyub** · 12-11-2006, 07:43 AM

that looks fugly, i dont understand watches costing that much - if you got a watch for £1000 people would still be just as impressed

**Aztegjpl** · 12-11-2006, 07:52 AM

I'd agree except for that rather large doohicky on the side. What is that, the winder?

I think that's the corkscrew.

**IronpumpedLady** · 12-11-2006, 07:53 AM

not manly enough

**machpamb** · 12-11-2006, 07:54 AM

I'd agree except for that rather large doohicky on the side. What is that, the winder?

Yeah the winder and the start/stop button for the stopwatch

**machpamb** · 12-11-2006, 07:55 AM

not manly enough

it wasnt exactly like that one, thats just and example of the style

**ådrrraj** · 12-11-2006, 03:34 PM

Reminds of the solid gold porsche glasses I tried on once. Nice, but a little obscene socially, just makes you look like a prick.

**Sthjrderfida** · 12-11-2006, 05:49 PM

It looks gash with that bottle opener on the side.

I bought a TAG last year for £2500, and it's gorgeous. But even thats too much for a watch, I just had some left over cash so thought **** it, why not

**harriettvanders** · 12-11-2006, 05:52 PM

any watch that has diamonds around the bezel screems tacky ness no matter how expensive

**inofindy** · 12-12-2006, 01:41 AM

I've worn a golden Rolex with diamonds everywhere. I mean everywhere. The dial was full, the bracelet was full, even the shoulders had a few... and yes, very tacky[rofl]

**Percocetti** · 12-12-2006, 02:10 AM

Does it tell time 150 times more accurately than a £100 watch?

Just kidding! Whatever floats your boat.

**machpamb** · 12-12-2006, 02:26 AM

any watch that has diamonds around the bezel screems tacky ness no matter how expensive

as I have said 2 times already in this thread, the pic aboves ISNT (IS NOT) the watch I tried on, just a simliar style!

Does it tell time 150 times more accurately than a £100 watch?

Just kidding! Whatever floats your boat.

And if you saw behind the watch face and looked through the crystal backing you would see that whats inside this watch is truely a work of art!

**harriettvanders** · 12-12-2006, 02:29 AM

[QUOTE=Looony;327581]as I have said 2 times already in this thread, the pic aboves ISNT (IS NOT) the watch I tried on, just a simliar style!

yes and I understood that i was just commenting on the fact that watches with diamonds for blokes is tacky...

**harriettvanders** · 12-12-2006, 02:30 AM

as I have said 2 times already in this thread, the pic aboves ISNT (IS NOT) the watch I tried on, just a simliar style!

And if you saw behind the watch face and looked through the crystal backing you would see that whats inside this watch is truely a word of art!

word of art aye

as in picture ?

**biannaruh** · 12-12-2006, 02:48 AM

Yup that sure is one helluva watch!

I had a similar one on last year ... Was really tough to find out there's actually something I really want but can't afford

**machpamb** · 12-12-2006, 02:54 AM

[quote=OHP;327585]

as I have said 2 times already in this thread, the pic aboves ISNT (IS NOT) the watch I tried on, just a simliar style!

yes and I understood that i was just commenting on the fact that watches with diamonds for blokes is tacky...

then yeah, i totally agree

11-13-2006, 07:33 AM	#1
dosyrotsbop Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 408 Senior Member	I've never had a watch in my life. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-13-2006, 08:49 AM	#2
IronpumpedLady Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 544 Senior Member	That's still far more than any watch is worth,who even needs a watch anymore? I can't believe to miss out the opportunity to use a 100% mechanic device to be different. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-13-2006, 03:42 PM	#3
lisualsethelp Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 462 Senior Member	sissy watch Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-11-2006, 07:28 AM	#4
machpamb Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 418 Senior Member	I tried on a watch today costing £15K Its was a Graham. Similar to the one below but a lot nicer. Cost £15000. Very nice!! Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-11-2006, 07:38 AM	#5
SasV7ReJ Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 310 Senior Member	I'd agree except for that rather large doohicky on the side. What is that, the winder? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-11-2006, 07:43 AM	#6
wepoiyub Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 406 Senior Member	that looks fugly, i dont understand watches costing that much - if you got a watch for £1000 people would still be just as impressed Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-11-2006, 07:52 AM	#7
Aztegjpl Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 560 Senior Member	I'd agree except for that rather large doohicky on the side. What is that, the winder? I think that's the corkscrew. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-11-2006, 07:53 AM	#8
IronpumpedLady Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 544 Senior Member	not manly enough Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-11-2006, 07:54 AM	#9
machpamb Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 418 Senior Member	I'd agree except for that rather large doohicky on the side. What is that, the winder? Yeah the winder and the start/stop button for the stopwatch Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-11-2006, 07:55 AM	#10
machpamb Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 418 Senior Member	not manly enough it wasnt exactly like that one, thats just and example of the style Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-11-2006, 03:34 PM	#11
ådrrraj Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 492 Senior Member	Reminds of the solid gold porsche glasses I tried on once. Nice, but a little obscene socially, just makes you look like a prick. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-11-2006, 05:49 PM	#12
Sthjrderfida Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 413 Senior Member	It looks gash with that bottle opener on the side. I bought a TAG last year for £2500, and it's gorgeous. But even thats too much for a watch, I just had some left over cash so thought **** it, why not Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-11-2006, 05:52 PM	#13
harriettvanders Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 458 Senior Member	any watch that has diamonds around the bezel screems tacky ness no matter how expensive Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-12-2006, 01:41 AM	#14
inofindy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 473 Senior Member	I've worn a golden Rolex with diamonds everywhere. I mean everywhere. The dial was full, the bracelet was full, even the shoulders had a few... and yes, very tacky[rofl] Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-12-2006, 02:10 AM	#15
Percocetti Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 497 Senior Member	Does it tell time 150 times more accurately than a £100 watch? Just kidding! Whatever floats your boat. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

12-12-2006, 02:26 AM	#16
machpamb Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 418 Senior Member	any watch that has diamonds around the bezel screems tacky ness no matter how expensive as I have said 2 times already in this thread, the pic aboves ISNT (IS NOT) the watch I tried on, just a simliar style! Does it tell time 150 times more accurately than a £100 watch? Just kidding! Whatever floats your boat. And if you saw behind the watch face and looked through the crystal backing you would see that whats inside this watch is truely a work of art! Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-12-2006, 02:29 AM	#17
harriettvanders Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 458 Senior Member	[QUOTE=Looony;327581]as I have said 2 times already in this thread, the pic aboves ISNT (IS NOT) the watch I tried on, just a simliar style! yes and I understood that i was just commenting on the fact that watches with diamonds for blokes is tacky... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-12-2006, 02:30 AM	#18
harriettvanders Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 458 Senior Member	as I have said 2 times already in this thread, the pic aboves ISNT (IS NOT) the watch I tried on, just a simliar style! And if you saw behind the watch face and looked through the crystal backing you would see that whats inside this watch is truely a word of art! word of art aye as in picture ? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-12-2006, 02:48 AM	#19
biannaruh Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 445 Senior Member	Yup that sure is one helluva watch! I had a similar one on last year ... Was really tough to find out there's actually something I really want but can't afford Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-12-2006, 02:54 AM	#20
machpamb Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 418 Senior Member	[quote=OHP;327585] as I have said 2 times already in this thread, the pic aboves ISNT (IS NOT) the watch I tried on, just a simliar style! yes and I understood that i was just commenting on the fact that watches with diamonds for blokes is tacky... then yeah, i totally agree Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote