General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
The issue actually gets a bit more fuzzy when you start talking about child tax credits/deductions (there is a new person involved at the relevant frontier, and you need to make decisions about the effect on welfare of creating a new human being)
Certain other tax expenditures at least improve equality significantly (earned income tax credit), whereas the health insurance and home interest deductions benefit the relatively rich disproportionately. |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
1) Because the mortgage tax deduction distorts between home ownership and renting, while the insurance deduction distorts between insurance and out-of-pocket health care consumption
2) In addition to these distortions, they both encourage overconsumption of their products 3) Hollowing out the tax base through this type of deduction reduces revenue in a way which can only be made up by increasing marginal rates. Marginal rates are the most important determinant of the deadweight loss of taxation at the work/leisure frontier |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
Actually, though, what the co-chairmen are proposing is a mixture of tax cuts and tax increases — tax cuts for the wealthy, tax increases for the middle class. They suggest eliminating tax breaks that, whatever you think of them, matter a lot to middle-class Americans — the deductibility of health benefits and mortgage interest — and using much of the revenue gained thereby, not to reduce the deficit, but to allow sharp reductions in both the top marginal tax rate and in the corporate tax rate.
It will take time to crunch the numbers here, but this proposal clearly represents a major transfer of income upward, from the middle class to a small minority of wealthy Americans. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/12/op...12krugman.html |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
Comments: |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
I don't understand why home ownership is such a positive in the first place. It reduces geographic mobility of the labor force, reducing the diversification benefit the US enjoys due to having the biggest market in the world (Euroland doesn't count as a truly integrated labor market IMO)
Also, it's not just us; very few countries allow mortgage tax deductions. The deduction serves to encourage leverage, along with the existence of FNM and FMCC |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|