LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-07-2006, 07:00 AM   #21
Erawise

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
Um, I will have to re-read your post there stern...

But bump for attension none-the-less.....
Erawise is offline


Old 03-19-2006, 07:00 AM   #22
Htb48JBf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
Is the site going to be used to display photos on a monitor, or as a source of high quality prints?

1. monitor: You don't need that high a resolution. A 4.3 mpix image in 4/3 aspect ratio would be 2400 pixels x 1800 pixels. The way it is displayed is determined by the resolution of the monitor. If the monitor resolution is 2400 x 1800, the image will fit the screen exactly. If you display an image of 4800 x 3600 on that monitor, it will not have any greater detail, but be four times larger than the monitor and difficult to view.

The advantage of a large mpix format is the ability to crop out the image without losing detail. The photos I post here are taken with a 2.1 mpix camera. The images are sized 1600 x 1200. I save a master copy at full resolution, and size a second copy down to 800 x 600. That's only 480,000 mpix.

2. Printer: If the printer is high resolution, increasing the resolution of the image will increase the detail of the photo, but reduce the image size.
A 1600 x 1200 taken with a resolution of 72 will produce a printed image of 22" x 16", but not of good detail. Increasing the resolution to 150 will produce a print of 10 x 8 and greater detail. The obvious advantage is to start with a large image. I am no expert on digital photography and I was advised that mp’s were unimportant. However comparing the photography on this forum there is a quality difference. When digital photography is resized the quality is higher, and when the original is considerably larger than my monitor size, the quality becomes all that much better.

Im happy that there is an interest in this endeavor, I will be contacting all interested parties via private message. Hopefully we can start putting the site together immediately.
Htb48JBf is offline


Old 04-20-2006, 07:00 AM   #23
xjNo4zvD

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
368
Senior Member
Default
Stern,

Yes, after the holidays. Do you still want max size? I can send you 1600 x 800, file size over 1 meg.

Since I've been good all year (unless a fat guy in a red suit reads this forum), there may be a new camera on the way. The originals will be over 3000x2000 and several megs.
xjNo4zvD is offline


Old 05-08-2006, 07:00 AM   #24
Lhiistyssdds

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
469
Senior Member
Default
I'm interested, but my input would probably be sporatic. I've got 4 MP's.
Lhiistyssdds is offline


Old 06-13-2006, 07:00 AM   #25
DurryVony

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
595
Senior Member
Default
I have a lot of stuff that I haven't posted here, of St. John and Riverside Church. Most of them are crap but there are a few good ones of the Riverside nave and parts of St. John. When I get un-lazy I'll make a thread.
DurryVony is offline


Old 06-18-2006, 07:00 AM   #26
Rchzygnc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
366
Senior Member
Default
I am, but armed with only a 2.0 mp. :x
Rchzygnc is offline


Old 06-18-2006, 07:00 AM   #27
CathBraunn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
As the database is quickly expanding with member photography I must now request that all photos be resized anywhere’s from 500 to 600 pixels. As bandwidth and space is limited, as of today this is a requirement. I will resize all members existing photography. And please feel free to continue contributions and in concern of resizing.

Thanks in Advance.
CathBraunn is offline


Old 06-21-2006, 07:00 AM   #28
newshep

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
388
Senior Member
Default
Ok. You're welcome to take any stuff from my current album too.
newshep is offline


Old 06-27-2006, 07:00 AM   #29
Stappipsy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
Seeing as I am giving credit for the photography pixels aren’t overly important. The quality will be lower, but I suppose you wont get a unified look when it’s a larger collaboration of different photographers, camera’s, in/experience, etc. etc. So whereas I would recommend a higher mp camera for some of my own interest and also as appreciation for your own efforts, beggars can’t be too choosy. While it is recommend that you have a 4-mp camera, it is not necessary. Ghul your photography will be greatly appreciated, and I will be contacting you through private message.
Stappipsy is offline


Old 06-28-2006, 07:00 AM   #30
maysubers

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
388
Senior Member
Default
The reason my site hasnt been updated in months is in addition to server trouble my old computer has since quit on me.

I am still interested in relaunching my site once I get a hold of the neccesary software, would members still be interested in contributing?

If I recieve no response, I will just let the site die on its own accord.
maysubers is offline


Old 07-06-2006, 07:00 AM   #31
alfredtaniypnx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
389
Senior Member
Default
The most likely scenario is that those pages exceeded there allocated bandwidth.
alfredtaniypnx is offline


Old 07-15-2006, 07:00 AM   #32
hojutok

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
No, one day when I have the time, probably soon, I'll resize a crapload of photos and put them in.
hojutok is offline


Old 07-24-2006, 07:00 AM   #33
sestomosi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
I am looking at the guide page, and things like the topic headers are difficult to distinguish from the selectables (It almost looks like they SHOULD get highlighted. I tried clicking on them several times.)

I would either renove the left bar on the "New Projects" and "Community" boards (the charcoal lines make it look like it just did not load completely) or change the color or background on them.

You culd also find different ways to have them highlighted. If you want, make a test page with a bunch of them on it and give us the link. I will let you know which ones I like the best...

As for that photo, you need some rom on the bottom, with links either to the main page, or default places (contact, etc). You may have it elsewhere, but people are kind of used to having that stuff down there.

A gradient background from black on left to that grey/brown you have on the right would look really good on that page....

You may also want to experiment with giving that photo a shadow. Sometimes it works nicely, other times it looks like you just grabbed it from MS Word....

Just some thoughts.....
sestomosi is offline


Old 08-01-2006, 07:00 AM   #34
Gulauur

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
595
Senior Member
Default
Great GUYS!

Remember whenever you do have photography all you need to do is upload it to the server. Afterwards send me a private message with the file names. If there are atleast 3 pictures of a building I will write a building page for it. If there are more than 3 tell me which ones you want to use.

As for the size of the pictures, each picture will be resized to a height of 551 pixels. I resize my own pictures to save on memory, and I would recommend that each user do the same. If you send me a fullsize picture it will be resized using html, while it doesnt always create the best results I will be using the same aspect ratio.

Hope this answers some questions.
Gulauur is offline


Old 09-06-2006, 07:00 AM   #35
timgreyuvcz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
370
Senior Member
Default
Nothing they haven't seen before

They resized all jaggedy... =/
timgreyuvcz is offline


Old 09-12-2006, 07:00 AM   #36
Smalmslobby

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
403
Senior Member
Default
yup. It would do us both a benefit if you would do the resizings. If resized the pictures must be under 600 pixels and more than 500.
Smalmslobby is offline


Old 09-25-2006, 07:00 AM   #37
M1iFiNmC

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
467
Senior Member
Default
I need to learn how to re-size my pictures :?
M1iFiNmC is offline


Old 10-04-2006, 07:00 AM   #38
shodulsilfeli

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
566
Senior Member
Default
Did anyone get my private message?
shodulsilfeli is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:25 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity