The age of consent should be lowered to 13. - Page 2 - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**retrahdggd** · 12-31-2010, 08:29 AM

No, no, no!

Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed!

Pee?! That's a pretty elementary function of a human of any age!

**machpamb** · 12-31-2010, 04:14 PM

You really think you should be arrested if you put it on a 19 year-old?

****, I wasn't really paying attention. I apply half plus seven for the purposes of what's socially acceptable, not what legally acceptable. So I think it would be kind of sleazy for me to bang a teenager, but as long as she's sixteen or older, it wouldn't be statutory rape.

**KeestRast** · 01-04-2011, 12:02 AM

Wouldn't that be M / F? Otherwise it'd be interesting to apply it.

No, that'd be sexist. A 22-year old woman should be allowed to have sex with a 15-year old boy if a 22-year old man can shag 15-year old girls.
However, I think there should be a fixed lower bound, because the 13/10 pairing is revolting, no matter what OzzyKP might think about youth rights. Age-based lower bound is not the best solution, because of individual sexual development pace. The best way, if you can avoid the moral panic this will cause, is a free voluntary check-up. If you are under 16 and feel old enough to have sex, go and talk to a doctor. No questions about your future partners asked, just an assessment of your physical and mental development. If you pass, go and **** your brains out. If you are busted by your parents or by the cop patrolling the lovers' lane, the slip you get from the doctor is your get your partner out of jail free card.
I'm not so sure about homosexual relationships. Call me a homophobe, but I feel that sex between a 22-year old man and a 15-year old girl is, while not something I support, an acceptable relationship, sex between a 22-year old man can and a 15-year old boy is wrong. I'd set the AoC at at least 16 or even 18 years with no age gap provision for homosexual relations, because coming to terms with your own deviant sexuality must be much harder than understanding what heteronormative sex is about (cue all those outed 50-year old Republican politicians).

**vladekad** · 01-04-2011, 08:13 PM

That's fine, but a 30 year old man can't watch it.

12-31-2010, 08:29 AM	#21
retrahdggd Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 419 Senior Member	No, no, no! Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed! Pee?! That's a pretty elementary function of a human of any age! Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-31-2010, 04:14 PM	#22
machpamb Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 418 Senior Member	You really think you should be arrested if you put it on a 19 year-old? ****, I wasn't really paying attention. I apply half plus seven for the purposes of what's socially acceptable, not what legally acceptable. So I think it would be kind of sleazy for me to bang a teenager, but as long as she's sixteen or older, it wouldn't be statutory rape. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-04-2011, 12:02 AM	#23
KeestRast Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 455 Senior Member	Wouldn't that be M / F? Otherwise it'd be interesting to apply it. No, that'd be sexist. A 22-year old woman should be allowed to have sex with a 15-year old boy if a 22-year old man can shag 15-year old girls. However, I think there should be a fixed lower bound, because the 13/10 pairing is revolting, no matter what OzzyKP might think about youth rights. Age-based lower bound is not the best solution, because of individual sexual development pace. The best way, if you can avoid the moral panic this will cause, is a free voluntary check-up. If you are under 16 and feel old enough to have sex, go and talk to a doctor. No questions about your future partners asked, just an assessment of your physical and mental development. If you pass, go and **** your brains out. If you are busted by your parents or by the cop patrolling the lovers' lane, the slip you get from the doctor is your get your partner out of jail free card. I'm not so sure about homosexual relationships. Call me a homophobe, but I feel that sex between a 22-year old man and a 15-year old girl is, while not something I support, an acceptable relationship, sex between a 22-year old man can and a 15-year old boy is wrong. I'd set the AoC at at least 16 or even 18 years with no age gap provision for homosexual relations, because coming to terms with your own deviant sexuality must be much harder than understanding what heteronormative sex is about (cue all those outed 50-year old Republican politicians). Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-04-2011, 08:13 PM	#24
vladekad Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 445 Senior Member	That's fine, but a 30 year old man can't watch it. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)