LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-08-2013, 02:08 PM   #1
gorbasevhuynani

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default I do not understand this "test"
Yesterday seeing pet policeman display, they saved your dog who required his leg amputated. They amputated it, and relieved him, then right before ownership, they 'examined' your dog by giving him and placing a plastic submit the pencil to wreck havoc on his food, h-e growled and bit it. He didnt rip it to parts, he nipped at it. Now-I dont approve of the examination being correct. The woman who saved him, to start with was destraught. She went in to his pencil bent down got a number of food and hand fed it to him. H-e didnt actually watch her hand. Today, wouldnt one believe that teasing and tormenting with a fake hand-and you realize your dog knows it aint a genuine hand-may deserve a chunk? It in my experience appeared that the individual didnt get injured, and on occasion even recognized with such a thing other then a of thanks-shouldnt THAT function as the test??? They PTS your dog instantly. After healing and all that preserving, it was killed by them. Doesnt appear fair.
gorbasevhuynani is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:18 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity