LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-31-2012, 05:04 PM   #1
georgshult

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
552
Senior Member
Default Rethinking energy
i wont post the articles but just the url. cosmos features this week are all about energy.

http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/featur...-scale-storage

Rethinking energy: Wind, solar and storage

http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/smart-cities-energy

Rethinking energy: Smart urbanisation

http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/featur...ovoltaic-cells

Rethinking energy: Organic solar cells for off-grid use

http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/featur...nuclear-energy

Rethinking energy: Advanced nuclear
georgshult is offline


Old 08-31-2012, 05:14 PM   #2
UKkoXJvF

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
Any comments on the contents?
UKkoXJvF is offline


Old 08-31-2012, 05:16 PM   #3
Khcyhshq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
403
Senior Member
Default
not by me. i just put them up for anyone who is interested.
Khcyhshq is offline


Old 08-31-2012, 10:39 PM   #4
drugstore

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
Regarding the first one, I always wondered why mechanical storage wasn't considered. Something that pushed water uphill, or compresses air, etc and can release it later would surely be cheaper than a battery to produce and install and increase in capacity? Maybe even almost as efficient as a battery in terms of the energy recovered.

Has it ever been seriously considered?
drugstore is offline


Old 08-31-2012, 10:49 PM   #5
asypecresty

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
382
Senior Member
Default
Well, pumping water back uphill for later use is used in the Snowy Hydro Scheme. That was pretty serious, and quite a while ago now.
asypecresty is offline


Old 08-31-2012, 11:01 PM   #6
whatisthebluepill

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
613
Senior Member
Default
As boxhead said, pumped storage has been around for years. It's also used in the UK, I remeber visiting a recently completed pumped storage scheme there about 45 years ago.

The main problems are that it needs a huge quantity of water and a substantial height difference to store a significant amount of energy, and the capital cost is high.

Still, I'm sure we will see more of it in the future as it's probably the most efficient way of using excess energy from wind and solar and the like.
whatisthebluepill is offline


Old 08-31-2012, 11:11 PM   #7
golfmenorca

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
Regarding the first one, I always wondered why mechanical storage wasn't considered. Something that pushed water uphill, or compresses air, etc and can release it later would surely be cheaper than a battery to produce and install and increase in capacity? Maybe even almost as efficient as a battery in terms of the energy recovered.

Has it ever been seriously considered?
Yes, it is done commercially in large scale systems and it works very well. There are numerous pumped storage systems around the world.

On a smaller scale, there are some problems. The first is that you need two tanks, or perhaps dams. My 300 watt solar pump will hoist up around 15000 litres of water per day against about 15 metres of head. That might represent 1.5 kwh. From this, I might be able to get 1 kWh back from a turbine. So lets multiply this by 3 as a minimum to provide 3kWh per day (which is about what I use). Then allow another factor of say 5 to allow for dull days. So now I need two tanks of size 15,000 * 15 = 225,000 litres. That matches those large water tanks that you often see in rural homes. The cost however is going to be perhaps $25k (I think). That is before you buy the turbine and pump that would be needed. By comparison, my batteries cost $9000. The life of the tanks might exceed that of the batteries I suppose. I am not sure how long the tanks would last.

The second issue is following the load demand. Turbines are not instantaneous. So you would need to use a battery bank to allow you to follow the load demand. A small battery bank perhaps, but batteries none the less. And of course an inverter.
golfmenorca is offline


Old 08-31-2012, 11:16 PM   #8
StitsVobsaith

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
537
Senior Member
Default
Thankyou all, I admit I assumed these types of systems were not in commercial use going by the tone of the article.

And I was surprised by the results of your calculation as well morrie, cheers. I intuitively believed that batteries would carry a higher capital cost.
StitsVobsaith is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 12:11 AM   #9
sisimelanyk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
484
Senior Member
Default
Capital cost for water storage *could* be less if you just happen to have the right geopgraphy.
sisimelanyk is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 12:13 AM   #10
sessoorale

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
463
Senior Member
Default
Morrie, what capacity for $9000 of batteries?
sessoorale is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 12:19 AM   #11
ImmitsRom

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
607
Senior Member
Default
I think we should use solar energy to vapourise sea water, then use existing landforms and wind patterns to condense the water vapour, and collect it in large natural tanks by placing artificial barriers at the end of existing valleys.
ImmitsRom is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 12:24 AM   #12
TypeTeasiaDer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
465
Senior Member
Default
The greens will never go for it.
TypeTeasiaDer is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 12:25 AM   #13
Scfdglkn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
502
Senior Member
Default
I think we should use solar energy to vapourise sea water, then use existing landforms and wind patterns to condense the water vapour, and collect it in large natural tanks by placing artificial barriers at the end of existing valleys.
I seem to remember being involved in the construction of one of those some years back. Only difference, we placed the artificial barrier just downstream of a lake discharge, raising the river level to that of the lake.
Scfdglkn is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 12:25 AM   #14
priordine

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
346
Senior Member
Default
Morrie, what capacity for $9000 of batteries?
6 x Enersun 1320s Martin.
priordine is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 12:27 AM   #15
HRCPda7R

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
315
Senior Member
Default
I think we should use solar energy to vapourise sea water, then use existing landforms and wind patterns to condense the water vapour, and collect it in large natural tanks by placing artificial barriers at the end of existing valleys.
Thats a grand dream, but you know what they say...
HRCPda7R is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 12:32 AM   #16
VoriEremiagem

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
555
Senior Member
Default
1320 ah
4v

5280 whr

Six of them


Over 30000 whr
30 kwhr


So about double the water system you mentioned?

Did I get the maths right?
VoriEremiagem is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 12:49 AM   #17
ticfarentibia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
1320 ah
4v

5280 whr

Six of them


Over 30000 whr
30 kwhr


So about double the water system you mentioned?

Did I get the maths right?
The design was for 10 times the daily demand, so yes, that does sound correct. But that is a nominal capacity only.
ticfarentibia is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 01:20 AM   #18
Bondjrno

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
354
Senior Member
Default
...barriers at the end of existing valleys. concrete? is that all you think of?

;-)
Bondjrno is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 01:56 AM   #19
oneliRafmeene

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
409
Senior Member
Default
I've been using about 10 Megajoules of electricity per day to heat this room during winter I'm wondering if using petrol might be less expensive.
oneliRafmeene is offline


Old 09-01-2012, 02:17 AM   #20
SkatrySkith

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
596
Senior Member
Default
Regarding the first one, I always wondered why mechanical storage wasn't considered. Something that pushed water uphill, or compresses air, etc and can release it later would surely be cheaper than a battery to produce and install and increase in capacity? Maybe even almost as efficient as a battery in terms of the energy recovered.

Has it ever been seriously considered?
Yes, pumped hydro is common place and compressed air storage and flywheel energy storage are two others in development, though i am not sure about their deployment.

Though using storage for tradition generation is the norm as you want to buy cheap (at night when baseload generators would rather sell cheap than shut down), then sell when the price as high (during peak periods).

If there is good geography for pumped hydro, it is probably already there.
SkatrySkith is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:01 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity