View Single Post
Old 05-02-2012, 05:30 PM   #55
slimfifa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
476
Senior Member
Default
B.C, see that read writing under Diddly's name - that means he's an _expert_ in rocks, and things to do with rocks, like how much it costs to turn them into other things, and how much it costs to get them out of the ground...

So philosophical arguments are not going to cut it in this debate. It doesn't matter what his attitude is, he knows the facts, so in order to continue the debate, you need to present more facts, not philosophical dalliances which just show that you haven't taken your hands out of your pajamas yet...
Strange that you should bring that up....You see many scenarios in science have more then one interpretation.
I myself have been lambasted for raising comments by off-line experts...particularly when they disagree with "online experts" ...
The great Fred Hoyle, wouldn't have a bar of the BB.
Like I said, diddly from my perspective has been shown to be somewhat pessimistic and a doomsayer.
And like I also said, in absence of expertise opinion other then diddly and the article, I'll wait and see how it all pans out, and then go along with the evidence, which may or may not be what diddly is expressing.
slimfifa is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:08 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity