DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - In which I am called an 'anti-ID troll' by Professor Steve Fuller

**CarrieSexy** · 08-17-2012, 02:21 AM

>>>If I really want to listen to anything now, I download the podcasts as the programme times are just terrible. They almost seem designed to prevent anyone listening to the interesting stuff on any subject.

I would have thought that podcasting allows for greater flexibility in listening times

maybe its just our older generation getting used to different media presentations in delivery

like as in a lot of older folk are used to real time delivery that has been going on for years and years, fifty or more years

I guess creating a balanced approach to science journalism may be a good thing if its genuine and not just for the sake of being being genuine just to appease whoever's in power

I think climate change may have had a hand in that, climate scientists vs corporate greed etc

but I would like to go with real observation, not pressure from rich people and their bank balance feeling threatened by real observation

Podcasts are great and RN are really good about getting them up quickly.

I think climate science has been subjected to serious pressure from groups with vested interests as have many "environment" related programmes. I think that this ensures less science and more talking heads which is very annoying.

08-17-2012, 02:21 AM	#74
CarrieSexy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 449 Senior Member	>>>If I really want to listen to anything now, I download the podcasts as the programme times are just terrible. They almost seem designed to prevent anyone listening to the interesting stuff on any subject. I would have thought that podcasting allows for greater flexibility in listening times maybe its just our older generation getting used to different media presentations in delivery like as in a lot of older folk are used to real time delivery that has been going on for years and years, fifty or more years I guess creating a balanced approach to science journalism may be a good thing if its genuine and not just for the sake of being being genuine just to appease whoever's in power I think climate change may have had a hand in that, climate scientists vs corporate greed etc but I would like to go with real observation, not pressure from rich people and their bank balance feeling threatened by real observation Podcasts are great and RN are really good about getting them up quickly. I think climate science has been subjected to serious pressure from groups with vested interests as have many "environment" related programmes. I think that this ensures less science and more talking heads which is very annoying.
	Quote