[enactolaelant]

the 'fear' being thought of in this topic is actually reversed as one seeing themself of the world, relatively.

in actuality, pursuing such recourses does deconstruct one's perceived attachments, as to cause fear of detachment. yet, this is merely intuition coming online to the practitioner, wherein the senses report 'detachment'; this detachment present though having been thought of as attachment, but it being of the world, relatively as mine and yours.

point is, intuitively one discovers that they've not been attached at all (in thought), they identifiably only of these relationships that have been of the outlying world alone. hence the fear of losing, whilst intuition disspells the thoughted realm of 'world outlying'.

thus it is, that as intuition deconstructs thoughted world to reclaim the 'you' in it, as it, one truly arrives to that 'attachment' which has never been of the world, but rather of 'you' being of god, that while you are in the world with others relationally; neither you nor they (all) have been undetached or undetachable, all being as one body of.

ergo, the dualistic 'thought' of polarised attach/detach is just that, dualistic thinking; and as such is False Evidence Appearing Real, therefore being F E A R.

the Beauty of this, is that 'you' remain as it were, to be relational, yet these relationships are NOW identified as You within, wherein the thoughted roles of separation and division having been claimed through deconstruction, the reclamation of true self being free is also free of role playing, whereby all others are freed as 'well'.

or what is realized within is also realized in the outlying. so to say, that realization within is actualization of the inner realization outward into that which had seemed to not have been 'you', but which now is seen as that which without, there is no YOU to be in it.

or to say, you being of god, it is that the world is of you, it being the you which is of god; therefore the world is of god through you, even as you of true self remain in it to be.

but, upward until this 'actualization', as an arc of understanding intuitively igniting the reclaiming lights within, one is that which has been written of in this saying, "forgive them Father, for they know not what they do".

to end this then would be to say, that this fear of becoming further detached is as if the light arriving is driving the shadowed self back into the corners of ones thought constructed identity.

yet, we being human are not roaches, are we?

finally, while we may run from this we may not hide, for in the deconstruction of thoughted world is all which would be hidden within removed, that the light fills completely to overflowing, whereupon overflowing one's relationships are as abundantly enriched as are they enriched first.

truthfully, to have such thought constructions removed has to enrich what is outlying in the world, because it simply places the values completely within the god-constucted which naturally through us...IS.

a tree in it's full import is now free to be as it is, free of whatever one would have constructively restrained it as a limitation toward usage. the same for all others, freed from usury, or the thought of what am "I" getting from this relationship, or 'conditional' berating of even those we'd thought to have loved, yet knew not that we misunderstood the true connection of sharing in kind equally and unconditionally.

ok, enough meandering nonsense....

but, the 'point of no return' is suggestive of having returned, such that here is you....finished/complete.

tim