DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**SkHukV3N** · 11-22-2011, 12:00 AM

It's interesting to think that in 2010 Bouiller actually got a lot of praise for turning the team around after the scandals and misery of 2009. The development work was also efficient during 2010. Right now Bouiller is not the only guy to blame. I think the instability in ownership can't have helped either. What concerns the car design and radical FEE, I actually view this experiment positively. At least they tried something different and risky to really try to catch top teams. In the end it didn't work out, but initially it seemed like a promising idea. But let's see, how can they build up the future on this experience. Initial signs aren't promising though and the loss of staff can't have helped either.

11-22-2011, 12:00 AM	#14
SkHukV3N Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 455 Senior Member	It's interesting to think that in 2010 Bouiller actually got a lot of praise for turning the team around after the scandals and misery of 2009. The development work was also efficient during 2010. Right now Bouiller is not the only guy to blame. I think the instability in ownership can't have helped either. What concerns the car design and radical FEE, I actually view this experiment positively. At least they tried something different and risky to really try to catch top teams. In the end it didn't work out, but initially it seemed like a promising idea. But let's see, how can they build up the future on this experience. Initial signs aren't promising though and the loss of staff can't have helped either.
	Quote