View Single Post
Old 04-03-2011, 06:52 AM   #37
ladleliDypenue

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
425
Senior Member
Default
I have never understood this need for fallacious statements.

Flexible bodywork has always been legal within the prescribed limits.

And just for the sake of making things clear, while some are trying hard to muddy everything, here is what the FIA F1 technical regulations specify:



http://argent.fia.com/web/fia-public.nsf/15A68242E9992FCEC12577F8004A826A/$FILE/1-2011%20TECHNICAL%20REGULATIONS%2010-12-2010.pdf

And the reason for these regulation is that there is no 100% rigid material to be used.
Don't quote the rules at me .

You know that I know that no material is strictly rigid , and that there is always some degree of flex .
That would be why I suggested that they might have used more weight .

Hammy suggested that they would copy the trait if they found it legal .
Clearly , this suggests that all the others were thinking the Bulls were pushing the limits farther than thier own teams were .

They , clearly , don't think so now .


Taking my comment as literally as you did , when you know me as well as you do , was a bit cheap , don't you think ?

Just who is trying to "muddy everything" here ?
ladleliDypenue is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:52 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity