DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**CesseOveldset** · 09-16-2008, 09:30 AM

The first link you provided actually supports what I said... er.

http://f1.gpupdate.net/en/news/2008/...ty-at-mclaren/

05 Aug 08

And that was 11 days ago.

Well obviously, like all aero innovations, they are compatible with some cars more than others. And obviously McLaren don't find it necessary/compatible with their car.

Like how the bridge wings on the nose aren't used by all of the F1 teams, but of course thats due to advertising space being the main influence in putting them there, instead of an aerodynamic advantage.

I would trust f1technical over a stupid blog with no grounding on facts any day.

09-16-2008, 09:30 AM	#9
CesseOveldset Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 550 Senior Member	The first link you provided actually supports what I said... er. http://f1.gpupdate.net/en/news/2008/...ty-at-mclaren/ 05 Aug 08 And that was 11 days ago. Well obviously, like all aero innovations, they are compatible with some cars more than others. And obviously McLaren don't find it necessary/compatible with their car. Like how the bridge wings on the nose aren't used by all of the F1 teams, but of course thats due to advertising space being the main influence in putting them there, instead of an aerodynamic advantage. I would trust f1technical over a stupid blog with no grounding on facts any day.
	Quote