View Single Post
Old 08-13-2008, 04:42 AM   #14
CowextetleSix

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
473
Senior Member
Default
My point is that the megapixel craze is a marketing gimmick. They would have been much better off developing the camera at 20, 18, 15mp even and worked on getting the pixels larger and the sensor a bit better than cramming a 25mp camera down the consumers throat. But most consumers wont know the difference and think they are better off.
I can agree in the terms of a P&S, but i must disagree for dSLR, assuming they do keep the images clean. Extra resolution is never a bad thing - it allows you more cropping (especially in this case, since you can get a nice exact APS-C 12MP crop out of this sensor) or just more detail. More MP is only a bad thing when image quality is sacrificed; in this case, I am not convinced users will be trading off IQ.

Admittedly, this sensor may out-resolve many of the lenses out there, and may lead to disappointment by some folks. The primo (in the Minolta/Sony case, "G" and "CZ" lenses) will be ok, but users will see a big difference in the cheap glass.
CowextetleSix is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:59 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity