DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Kamendoriks** · 12-19-2011, 02:34 AM

more like lots of little camera's took lots and lots of photo's over and over and over again until they were able to piece together light photons as they move. That one trillion frames a second is highly misleading. It is a tricked up effective rate. Still cool tho.

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/20...es-per-second/ explanation

Personally I think that that if you can capture the movement of a beam of light in slow motion then you're entitled to call it a trillion frames per second.

12-19-2011, 02:34 AM	#8
Kamendoriks Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 627 Senior Member	more like lots of little camera's took lots and lots of photo's over and over and over again until they were able to piece together light photons as they move. That one trillion frames a second is highly misleading. It is a tricked up effective rate. Still cool tho. http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/20...es-per-second/ explanation Personally I think that that if you can capture the movement of a beam of light in slow motion then you're entitled to call it a trillion frames per second.
	Quote