DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Aztegjpl** · 11-15-2011, 01:28 AM

Well i hope the government realises the paying public is the No 1 client and hence it is the public that should be consulted on the design aspects which include seating width, leg room (please don't have the airline industry mentality and cram us in like cattle), toilet facilities, food and beverage facilities transport to and from the ground which must cater for BOTH public transport and private transport, the ability to get in and out of the stadium both inside the stadium and outside it. For instance the room outside Subiaco Oval is totally inadequate, you virtually take 3 or 4 steps and you are on the road.

11-15-2011, 01:28 AM	#4
Aztegjpl Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 560 Senior Member	Well i hope the government realises the paying public is the No 1 client and hence it is the public that should be consulted on the design aspects which include seating width, leg room (please don't have the airline industry mentality and cram us in like cattle), toilet facilities, food and beverage facilities transport to and from the ground which must cater for BOTH public transport and private transport, the ability to get in and out of the stadium both inside the stadium and outside it. For instance the room outside Subiaco Oval is totally inadequate, you virtually take 3 or 4 steps and you are on the road.
	Quote